NFC wrote:Jaensch has improved so much since being drafted, he's a quality player.
I think we'll lose him soon thanks to the Crows current on-field ineptitude.
by Barto » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:50 pm
NFC wrote:Jaensch has improved so much since being drafted, he's a quality player.
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:39 am
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:48 am
Jimmy wrote:how did kate tenace go for the bays?
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:49 am
Barto wrote:NFC wrote:Jaensch has improved so much since being drafted, he's a quality player.
I think we'll lose him soon thanks to the Crows current on-field ineptitude.
by Brodlach » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:03 am
Dutchy wrote:Barto wrote:NFC wrote:Jaensch has improved so much since being drafted, he's a quality player.
I think we'll lose him soon thanks to the Crows current on-field ineptitude.
Do they have any LTI's to upgrade him?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:06 am
by Brodlach » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:09 am
Dutchy wrote:Forgot about Moran, didnt Schmidt get elevated on the weekend? Who did he replace?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:11 pm
Dutchy wrote:Jimmy wrote:how did kate tenace go for the bays?
being a smartarse Jimmy?
by wycbloods » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:16 pm
Jimmy wrote:Dutchy wrote:Jimmy wrote:how did kate tenace go for the bays?
being a smartarse Jimmy?
oh crap, that was a bad typo..seriously...![]()
serious question.
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:45 pm
wycbloods wrote:Jimmy wrote:Dutchy wrote:Jimmy wrote:how did kate tenace go for the bays?
being a smartarse Jimmy?
oh crap, that was a bad typo..seriously...![]()
serious question.
yep t and n i get them mixed up all the time.
by Pseudo » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:49 pm
Jimmy wrote:wycbloods wrote:yep t and n i get them mixed up all the time.
hey....dont be a douche, [...]
by wycbloods » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:52 pm
Pseudo wrote:Jimmy wrote:wycbloods wrote:yep t and n i get them mixed up all the time.
hey....dont be a douche, [...]
Would've maximised your humour potential if you'd called him a "cutn".
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:58 pm
wycbloods wrote:Pseudo wrote:Jimmy wrote:wycbloods wrote:yep t and n i get them mixed up all the time.
hey....dont be a douche, [...]
Would've maximised your humour potential if you'd called him a "cutn".
That is gold![]()
![]()
![]()
by wycbloods » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:04 pm
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:17 pm
wycbloods wrote:I found it funny thats why i laughed![]()
.
by wycbloods » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:28 pm
Jimmy wrote:wycbloods wrote:I found it funny thats why i laughed![]()
.
the fact you find it funny is actually funnyand if thats lost on you, then...wow...
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:55 pm
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:06 pm
Dutchy wrote:no worries Jimmy, to answer your question he is going OK, nothing brilliant but still finding his feet I would say, takes most AFL blokes a fair bit of time to adapt to the style, smaller ovals and having to get more of your own ball.
by Jimmy » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:29 pm
Dutchy wrote:24
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |