North v Glenelg Trial @ Footy Pk No 3 13/3/10

[Wedgie]

Well I was sitting next to rainman, who decided he would keep score this week, after walking out against Norwood thinking we had lost.

He will be putting up a thorough match report at a later time. Jimmy Allan was BOG though

lol@rainman

[dedja]

No scoreboard, just keeping tabs

[locky801]

From reading through this appears North were around 7 goals up early in the 3rd 1/4 and then only just won. Only trials I know but thats the last 2 trials North have had a huge lead at half time only to be nearly run over in the last, hopefully it's due to changing rotations etc and not something we will have to endure all season proper

[The Sleeping Giant]

Wouldn't read too much into it. Although I know you will probably bring it up whenever you can. I think both weeks, players who have been good contributers in the first half, haven't been back on in the 2nd.

[locky801]

Wouldn't read too much into it. Although I know you will probably bring it up whenever you can. I think both weeks, players who have been good contributers in the first half, haven't been back on in the 2nd.

havent seen either game but seems like a logical explanation, thats why I mentioned the changing rotations, thanks

[on the rails]

North vs Glenelg 1/4 by 1/4
5-3 v 2-1
10-3 v 4-3
14-4 v 11-8
Final
17-6 (108) 15-10 (100)

Goal Scorers for North
Ryswyk 1
Thompson 3
Dempsey 2
Motlop 2
Whyman 2
Pfeiffer 1
Delvins 2
Alleway 1
Hay 1
Gill 1
Thiele 1


For the Bays - saw Grima kick 1 maybe 2 after some shocking circa 2009 finals like shots at goal! Bode must have kicked at least 3 but was very angry!

For WHUFC - Allan picked up a bucket load of possessions and didn't miss a team mate all day.


Only a trial but North looking okay considering a large number of first choice players missing still.

[gothebombers]

think its a different grima that played last year. i believe this one played reserves all year. might be able to kick better than his bro

[The Sleeping Giant]

No, it was the "good" one.

[gothebombers]

ok...

[bayman]

i thought north looked sharper for the majority of the game, i also thought we had improved on last weeks trial, (apparently west beat sturt today according to a text i received) i thought rudolph was very good up forward & i'd suggest he kicked 5 or 6 (without writing anything down), other players (glenelg) showed glimpses of form but were in & out all day barring willoughby & bode, was great to see mouse there supporting the boys.....is there any mediators out there ???

[bayman]

No, it was the "good" one.

he might end up the better one though

[topsywaldron]

If he was you'd be blaming James Moore then?

Blaming James Moore will start in a few weeks.

Fasten your seatbelts chaps it's going to be a fun ride coming up.

[whufc]

North vs Glenelg 1/4 by 1/4
5-3 v 2-1
10-3 v 4-3
14-4 v 11-8
Final
17-6 (108) 15-10 (100)

Goal Scorers for North
Ryswyk 1
Thompson 3
Dempsey 2
Motlop 2
Whyman 2
Pfeiffer 1
Delvins 2
Alleway 1
Hay 1
Gill 1
Thiele 1


For the Bays - saw Grima kick 1 maybe 2 after some shocking circa 2009 finals like shots at goal! Bode must have kicked at least 3 but was very angry!

For WHUFC - Allan picked up a bucket load of possessions and didn't miss a team mate all day.


Only a trial but North looking okay considering a large number of first choice players missing still.

even i can do that when i kick the ball twenty meters sidewards and backwards, hanging at the back of the pack.

give me Callinan, O'Sullivan, Dutschke, or the Gowans any day of the week thankyou.

[goraw]

tackling from both sides was good today. holding the ball seems to have changed considerably since last year, no incentive to go for the ball in close , hoping its just the umpires getting practice aswell and wake up to the fact its a mans game and ur allowed go for the ball.

[hereselmo1]

3 goals to Wade Thomspon? He cops a fair bit of flack on here, how did he play?

[Big Phil]

Well I was sitting next to rainman, who decided he would keep score this week, after walking out against Norwood thinking we had lost.

He will be putting up a thorough match report at a later time. Jimmy Allan was BOG though

Wouldn't want it to be too thorough a report TSG, it is only a trial game and we know how certain people feel about lengthy match reports on trial games

[The Sleeping Giant]

I said thorough, not lenghty.

He does seem to have not worried about, which is fair enough. It is only a trial game.

[Big Phil]

I said thorough, not lenghty.

He does seem to have not worried about, which is fair enough. It is only a trial game.

Sometimes being thorough can also mean it will be lengthy also, at least in my case anyway

Regardless, it was all said tounge in cheek, hence the

[The Sleeping Giant]

I understand the meaning of and never take offence.

[Big Phil]

I understand the meaning of and never take offence.

Very good then

I will post my thorough and lengthy match reports of the Dogs v Norwood game tomorrow, off to bed shortly...

Anyway, back on to the topic at hand, did the Power allocated boys play for the Bays today ?