EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!!![]()
I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game.
Or Glenelg...
by The Apostle » Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:40 pm
EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!!![]()
I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game.
by spell_check » Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:45 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!!![]()
I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game.
Or Glenelg...
by dedja » Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:49 pm
by spell_check » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:05 am
dedja wrote:Spelly, you must be more bored than Mickyj with the bye this week.
C'mon, I've been trying to get this thread back on track in most of my 6 posts!![]()
Don't forget to add one more to the total for this thread.
by The Apostle » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:11 am
spell_check wrote:The Apostle AK wrote:EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!!![]()
I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game.
Or Glenelg...
Ditto:
Last weeks review thread between Bays and Eagles:
stampy 4
am Bays 3
dedja 2
Pottsy 1
bayman 1
Dutchy 1
This thread up to this post:
dedja 6
am Bays 3
Dutchy 1
Conclusion: You are onto something here!
by zipzap » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:15 am
spell_check wrote:EasyE wrote:I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game.
Only one way to find that out!![]()
![]()
Last weeks review:
csbowes 7
Jimmy 6
zipzap 3
CUTTERMAN 3
bluegirl2002 2
MST 2
therisingblues 2
smithy 1
phantom57 1
purch 1
Voice 1
This thread as of this post:
purch 6
CUTTERMAN 5
blues2002 2
Cambridge Clarrie 1
Conclusion: Too early to call, IMO.
by bayman » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:17 am
am Bays wrote:Based on a 5 sec video looked like a late charge, I'm assuming a 50 was paid that is all it should get. Didn't look like there was any contact to the head to make it look meore serious than late forcefull contact following a mark. IMO.
by spell_check » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:22 am
zipzap wrote:spell_check wrote:EasyE wrote:I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game.
Only one way to find that out!![]()
![]()
Last weeks review:
csbowes 7
Jimmy 6
zipzap 3
CUTTERMAN 3
bluegirl2002 2
MST 2
therisingblues 2
smithy 1
phantom57 1
purch 1
Voice 1
This thread as of this post:
purch 6
CUTTERMAN 5
blues2002 2
Cambridge Clarrie 1
Conclusion: Too early to call, IMO.
Love your work Spelly
(And this post doesn't count by the way!)
by stampy » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:22 am
by sjt » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:25 am
by JAS » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:27 am
sjt wrote:See Dedja, another reason all games should be played at the same time, JAS has locked next weeks game thread.
by purch » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:30 am
stampy wrote:lets just say i am shocked at this result![]()
by purch » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:32 am
by JAS » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:34 am
by sjt » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:35 am
JAS wrote:sjt wrote:See Dedja, another reason all games should be played at the same time, JAS has locked next weeks game thread.
A few more hours won't kill you...now stop whining and get back on topic
Regards
JAS
by Grahaml » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:45 am
by zipzap » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:47 am
Grahaml wrote: Norwood were able to make our forward 50 so congested
by csbowes » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:05 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Not going to be an easy game next week for either team (and I reckon should be a beauty for neutrals), but I reckon the Dogs will react to their poor form today so your boys would need to be on song.
by topsywaldron » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:08 am
Grahaml wrote:Pretty ordinary standard of game today.
by csbowes » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:09 am
The Apostle AK wrote:I can't believe the amount of disrespect shown to Centrals in this thread![]()
![]()
...one shocker and everyones writing them off (Sturt and Norwood don't have shockers do they?)...you would of thought after the last 10 years that ppl on here would have shown Centrals more respect
...
The real football starts next weekend...
...and Norwood (after being predicted by a lot of punters at the start of this season to be a top 3 contender) won't be there...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |