NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby Long live SAnFL » Sun May 19, 2013 1:48 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Long live SAnFL wrote:Both involve conflict?


:lol:

You mean one involved violence, and the other a disagreement. You are drawing a long bow. Get over your Norwood shit and move on.


No both involved conflict. :axe:
User avatar
Long live SAnFL
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:36 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times
Grassroots Team: Payneham NU

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby therisingblues » Sun May 19, 2013 2:18 pm

CENTURION wrote:
kickinit wrote:the funny thing about this is people think because chris davies has said the sign can be at games that weslo or the police have no right in taking it down. Weslo are employed to ensure crowd management, at any stage if they believe it's in the best interest to remove the sign then they will do so and have every right to do so.

Maybe instead of trying to get on your high horse and giving eric bad publicity you should try to workout the communication breakdown between Weslo, SANFL and yourself.

I am, that's why I liaise with Chris every week, that's why I just emailed WESLO & that's why I just rang the Operations Manager at WESLO. He told me that, up to now, they have received NO FORMAL INSTRUCTION from Chris Davies saying that the banner is approved!
I will sort this out tomorrow morning & I will carry the formal approval with Eric at all times from now on.
I will also email the letter to all SANFL clubs.

Okay, assuming that's true, what was their reason for saying Eric ISN'T allowed? Did they receive instruction on that?
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby RB » Sun May 19, 2013 2:26 pm

Regardless of WESLO's actions, Chris Davies/the Sanfl ought to be condemned for their incompetent communication. After so many weeks, every WESLO employee should know exactly what Centurian is and isn't allowed to do. WESLO should have been told in the most unequivocal terms that Eric is OK as long as it's not on the playing surface etc.
User avatar
RB
Coach
 
Posts: 6101
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 839 times
Been liked: 1251 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby wild dog » Sun May 19, 2013 2:36 pm

kickinit wrote:the funny thing about this is people think because chris davies has said the sign can be at games that weslo or the police have no right in taking it down. Weslo are employed to ensure crowd management, at any stage if they believe it's in the best interest to remove the sign then they will do so and have every right to do so.

Maybe instead of trying to get on your high horse and giving eric bad publicity you should try to workout the communication breakdown between Weslo, SANFL and yourself.


Given the circumstances a bit of grand standing is understandable. Also I don't think it is bad publicity.
User avatar
wild dog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:56 am
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 180 times
Grassroots Team: Smithfield

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sun May 19, 2013 2:46 pm

No such thing as bad publicity.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby kickinit » Sun May 19, 2013 2:54 pm

wild dog wrote:
kickinit wrote:the funny thing about this is people think because chris davies has said the sign can be at games that weslo or the police have no right in taking it down. Weslo are employed to ensure crowd management, at any stage if they believe it's in the best interest to remove the sign then they will do so and have every right to do so.

Maybe instead of trying to get on your high horse and giving eric bad publicity you should try to workout the communication breakdown between Weslo, SANFL and yourself.


Given the circumstances a bit of grand standing is understandable. Also I don't think it is bad publicity.


not a good look when the owner of the sign is being escorted from the oval by police.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sun May 19, 2013 3:03 pm

kickinit wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:No such thing as bad publicity.


:lol: :lol: so apparently i'm slow because i'm a body builder (even though it takes a heap of knowledge to succeed) so what's your excuse? reading your comments makes it pretty clear your not too bright.


kickinit wrote:Maybe instead of trying to get on your high horse and giving eric bad publicity you should try to workout the communication breakdown between Weslo, SANFL and yourself.


Maybe you should have read a few more posts before making this post.

Never heard the "No such thing as bad publicity" saying before kickinit? I thought it was quite common.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby wild dog » Sun May 19, 2013 3:06 pm

kickinit wrote:
wild dog wrote:
kickinit wrote:the funny thing about this is people think because chris davies has said the sign can be at games that weslo or the police have no right in taking it down. Weslo are employed to ensure crowd management, at any stage if they believe it's in the best interest to remove the sign then they will do so and have every right to do so.

Maybe instead of trying to get on your high horse and giving eric bad publicity you should try to workout the communication breakdown between Weslo, SANFL and yourself.


Given the circumstances a bit of grand standing is understandable. Also I don't think it is bad publicity.


not a good look when the owner of the sign is being escorted from the oval by police.


For the owner or the Police? I gather you mean the owner, and if that is the case

Image
User avatar
wild dog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:56 am
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 180 times
Grassroots Team: Smithfield

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby whufc » Sun May 19, 2013 3:08 pm

kickinit wrote:
wild dog wrote:
kickinit wrote:the funny thing about this is people think because chris davies has said the sign can be at games that weslo or the police have no right in taking it down. Weslo are employed to ensure crowd management, at any stage if they believe it's in the best interest to remove the sign then they will do so and have every right to do so.

Maybe instead of trying to get on your high horse and giving eric bad publicity you should try to workout the communication breakdown between Weslo, SANFL and yourself.


Given the circumstances a bit of grand standing is understandable. Also I don't think it is bad publicity.


not a good look when the owner of the sign is being escorted from the oval by police.


if anything i think its a great look and nearly everyone at the ground knew it was Weslo and SAPOL being heavy handed.

i was right next to Centurian as he was escorted out and he had plenty of people coming up saying they agree with the banner and his removal was a joke etc etc, plenty of people caught it on phone cameras as well to show how heavy handed it was.

if anything all this 'bad publicity' is doing is uniting more people to the cause.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28593
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5918 times
Been liked: 2832 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby kickinit » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Maybe you should have read a few more posts before making this post.

Never heard the "No such thing as bad publicity" saying before kickinit? I thought it was quite common.


I did read and all centurion had done was email weslo and speak to chris. obvisously the communication between chris and weslo isn't happening and thats what he should be looking at. No point getting the ok from chris if weslo have been told different. I will also add that centrion follow up post to mine makes me think he has realised this and will look to get this sorted out this week.

I have heard the "no such thing as bad publicity". seeing as don't think any publicity can be bad how would you think Garibaldi metwurst would go if it came back on the market. There is always the chance for bad publicity.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby kickinit » Sun May 19, 2013 3:27 pm

whufc wrote:if anything i think its a great look and nearly everyone at the ground knew it was Weslo and SAPOL being heavy handed.

i was right next to Centurian as he was escorted out and he had plenty of people coming up saying they agree with the banner and his removal was a joke etc etc, plenty of people caught it on phone cameras as well to show how heavy handed it was.

if anything all this 'bad publicity' is doing is uniting more people to the cause.


so your saying weslo or sapol have no right to evict someone from a stadium?
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby wild dog » Sun May 19, 2013 3:28 pm

whufc wrote:i was right next to Centurian as he was escorted out and he had plenty of people coming up saying they agree with the banner and his removal was a joke etc etc, plenty of people caught it on phone cameras as well to show how heavy handed it was.

if anything all this 'bad publicity' is doing is uniting more people to the cause.


Yep, my wife has little to do with footy and she pointed out the sign at the game. Discussed it for a fair amount this morning and she is now interested in the issue and could not believe how poorly it was handled.
User avatar
wild dog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:56 am
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 180 times
Grassroots Team: Smithfield

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby therisingblues » Sun May 19, 2013 3:31 pm

I don't think Centurion is planning on selling any metwurst,
You obviously don't understand the correct application of "no such thing as bad publicity".
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby therisingblues » Sun May 19, 2013 3:33 pm

kickinit wrote:
whufc wrote:if anything i think its a great look and nearly everyone at the ground knew it was Weslo and SAPOL being heavy handed.

i was right next to Centurian as he was escorted out and he had plenty of people coming up saying they agree with the banner and his removal was a joke etc etc, plenty of people caught it on phone cameras as well to show how heavy handed it was.

if anything all this 'bad publicity' is doing is uniting more people to the cause.


so your saying weslo or sapol have no right to evict someone from a stadium?

You know, we could explain it to you, but that would just open the door for you not to understand something else.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby kickinit » Sun May 19, 2013 3:36 pm

therisingblues wrote:I don't think Centurion is planning on selling any metwurst,
You obviously don't understand the correct application of "no such thing as bad publicity".


never said centurion was going to sell metwurst, it was purely a example of bad publicity. ask any business owner and they will tell the "no such thing as bad publicity" is a joke.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby kickinit » Sun May 19, 2013 3:38 pm

therisingblues wrote:You know, we could explain it to you, but that would just open the door for you not to understand something else.


I understand fully, weslo and sapol where doing their job that they are employed to do.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby whufc » Sun May 19, 2013 3:39 pm

kickinit wrote:
whufc wrote:if anything i think its a great look and nearly everyone at the ground knew it was Weslo and SAPOL being heavy handed.

i was right next to Centurian as he was escorted out and he had plenty of people coming up saying they agree with the banner and his removal was a joke etc etc, plenty of people caught it on phone cameras as well to show how heavy handed it was.

if anything all this 'bad publicity' is doing is uniting more people to the cause.


so your saying weslo or sapol have no right to evict someone from a stadium?


man you jump to conclusions, what part of my post suggests they are not allowed to evict anyone.

i think most would consider four people manhandling a non violent, non threathning average size gentleman 150 metres out of the ground to be 'heavy handed'.

escpecially considering his only offence was trying to explain that he had permission to have the banner.

is that simple enough for you to understand.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28593
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5918 times
Been liked: 2832 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby therisingblues » Sun May 19, 2013 3:40 pm

kickinit wrote:
therisingblues wrote:I don't think Centurion is planning on selling any metwurst,
You obviously don't understand the correct application of "no such thing as bad publicity".


never said centurion was going to sell metwurst, it was purely a example of bad publicity. ask any business owner and they will tell the "no such thing as bad publicity" is a joke.

No he's not selling metwurst he's trying to draw attention to a cause in which case "there's no such thing as bad publicity!"
2nd time explained.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby kickinit » Sun May 19, 2013 4:21 pm

whufc wrote:
kickinit wrote:
whufc wrote:if anything i think its a great look and nearly everyone at the ground knew it was Weslo and SAPOL being heavy handed.

i was right next to Centurian as he was escorted out and he had plenty of people coming up saying they agree with the banner and his removal was a joke etc etc, plenty of people caught it on phone cameras as well to show how heavy handed it was.

if anything all this 'bad publicity' is doing is uniting more people to the cause.


so your saying weslo or sapol have no right to evict someone from a stadium?


man you jump to conclusions, what part of my post suggests they are not allowed to evict anyone.

i think most would consider four people manhandling a non violent, non threathning average size gentleman 150 metres out of the ground to be 'heavy handed'.

escpecially considering his only offence was trying to explain that he had permission to have the banner.

is that simple enough for you to understand.


so he is laying assualt charges then? seeing it was as a bad as you make it out to be then I would of thought it would of been the first thing he did. I also would of thought that the police officers would of asked him to leave before they "manhandled" him out of the stadium. Which to me suggest that he refused to do so? I'm not a lawyer but i'm pretty sure if your asked to move on or leave a area and you fail to do is breaking the law.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
kickinit
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 95 times

Re: NO AFL IN THE SANFL BANNER WEEKLY UPDATE

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sun May 19, 2013 4:22 pm

kickinit wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Maybe you should have read a few more posts before making this post.

Never heard the "No such thing as bad publicity" saying before kickinit? I thought it was quite common.


I did read and all centurion had done was email weslo and speak to chris. obvisously the communication between chris and weslo isn't happening and thats what he should be looking at. No point getting the ok from chris if weslo have been told different. I will also add that centrion follow up post to mine makes me think he has realised this and will look to get this sorted out this week.

I have heard the "no such thing as bad publicity". seeing as don't think any publicity can be bad how would you think Garibaldi metwurst would go if it came back on the market. There is always the chance for bad publicity.


Don't forget the Catholic church molesting children.

But then

Essendon drug scandal = record membership numbers

Amy's Baking Company = booked out restaurant

Spring Valley = company saved
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |