SA Footy

Dols wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:

Dols wrote:

Jim05 wrote:What money??
Port dont pay and the Crows pay a measely $50k.

How much you getting from the sale of footy park.......[emoji22][emoji22][emoji22][emoji22]

2 million is a good start


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FFS will you learn how to use the "Quote" button.
It's a f%#king nightmare trying to read the thread by the time you've finished.

not my problem it's the system, hang on, that sounds like the SANFL, according to others!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't blame the system if you're too stupid to work it out like 99% of humans do.
You do realise your emoji crap just shows up as jibberish too?

^ This.

RB wrote:^ This.

/\this [emoji110][emoji533]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good to see the Falcons get over the Royals in WA, setting up a pure GF against Subi.

CENTURION wrote:FFS, this is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo tedious.

You started it.

FlyingHigh wrote:Good to see the Falcons get over the Royals in WA, setting up a pure GF against Subi.

Was great to see the WAFL stand up to the Eagles also. They applied to get permits for McGinnity and Selwood to play for the Royals today and were declined. Apparantly the commentators on radio were having a whinge about it and claiming the WAFL should be helping West Coast in their quest for a AFL flag

morell wrote:That "cap" money is used to develop players so that they can fit back into the AFL system better, not to win SANFL flags.

Precisely the reason the two teams shouldn't be in the comp.

Jim05 wrote:

FlyingHigh wrote:Good to see the Falcons get over the Royals in WA, setting up a pure GF against Subi.

Was great to see the WAFL stand up to the Eagles also. They applied to get permits for McGinnity and Selwood to play for the Royals today and were declined. Apparantly the commentators on radio were having a whinge about it and claiming the WAFL should be helping West Coast in their quest for a AFL flag

Good to hear.
Can imagine that mentality in WA. Probably think Crowley should have been able to have a run in Peel's u/18's too.

It is hard for me to go to South's annual general meetings as I live in the north east and I don't drive but are the concerns about the AFL teams raised at the club AGMs by members and if so, what are the feedback from the boards?

This seems to be the best forums for members to get their views across as I don't know if this site is Y2k compliance and can handle pages numbers of 4 digits.

I guess we will see the clubs financial performances soon so we will get an idea of the health of the clubs.

SANFL PREMIERSHIPS
In the eyes of some or many
This list is for the exisisting clubs as of now

NW 30
NA 13
ST 13
SA 11
CD 9
WA 8
GL 4
WWT 3
PR 0
AR 0

A chance for West Adelaide to get to equal 5th with Centrals if they win they win the 2015 GF
WWT have the chance to get to equal 7th with Glenelg

It will be a long time before any team passes Norwood
That is, unless the old Port Adelaide Magpies of 1870 -2013 reform
Just for the record that version of Port Adelaide has 36 premierships

mal wrote:SANFL PREMIERSHIPS
In the eyes of some or many
This list is for the exisisting clubs as of now

NW 18
ST 13
NA 11
CD 9
WA 8
GL 4
SA 3
WWT 3
PR 0
AR 0

Edited above for accuracy... SANFL was formed in 1907, you can't count the earlier one's. They never used to be counted until some sad case at the Advertiser decided to give Norwood a boost to help them catch up to Port Adelaide.

For the record, I think Port Adelaide (Magpies) would be on 31.

I'm pretty sure people usually count all the way back to 1877.

They never used to...

Plus if that's the case, why are we leaving some flags out... i.e. where's the Victorian premiership?

Add them to the list then...

... or better yet, aren't they the original North Adelaide, so why don't we say North Adelaide have won 14?

... and where is Adelaide's flag from 1886?

I prefer Mal's originally tally. South's decade of dominance needs recognition

saintal wrote:I prefer Mal's originally tally. South's decade of dominance needs recognition

I'm sympathetic to that... just not a fan of Norwood!

Actually, shouldn't we count Torrens flags in the WWT list... give them 7?

csbowes wrote:They never used to...

Plus if that's the case, why are we leaving some flags out... i.e. where's the Victorian premiership?

Add them to the list then...

... or better yet, aren't they the original North Adelaide, so why don't we say North Adelaide have won 14?

... and where is Adelaide's flag from 1886?

To save confusion
Records since 1877
My listing was for 'existing clubs' as of present day teams

What does it matter, someone is a distant second and will be for a long, long time.

Exactly right

Norwood aren't going to lose top spot for many generations

Article from June 2014 , about Port Adelaides SANFL Premierships


http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/p ... zsmum.html