by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:20 pm
by cennals05 » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:24 pm
whufc wrote:Depending on who you speak to Centrals are far from a yes as well
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:26 pm
cennals05 wrote:whufc wrote:Depending on who you speak to Centrals are far from a yes as well
It would have been nice if the club had engaged its members on this issue in some way.
by BrekkyDJ » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:29 pm
by Barto » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:33 pm
by saintal » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:46 pm
Barto wrote:Sturt are a yes. Released by the club this afternoon:
http://premierimages.sportsubs.com.au/f ... cision.pdf
by Mark Dreher » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:51 pm
by Ecky » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:56 pm
Brenton Sanderson wrote:"The SANFL is a strong competition as it is and the injection of the Crows seconds side will have the SANFL go from strength to strength, with bigger crowds and more revenue.
"It will sustain the competition in the long term."
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by heater31 » Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:56 pm
Mark Dreher wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/adelaide-football-club-set-to-have-reserves-team-accepted-into-sanfl-comp/story-fnia3nqh-1226697350523#mm-register
![]()
![]()
by Gozu » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:05 pm
It is understood the final two votes to be secured were those of Norwood and South Adelaide.
by areaman » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:11 pm
Ecky wrote:Brenton Sanderson wrote:"The SANFL is a strong competition as it is and the injection of the Crows seconds side will have the SANFL go from strength to strength, with bigger crowds and more revenue.
"It will sustain the competition in the long term."
We hope you are right, Sando! But if you aren't, you won't give a sh.t, will you?
by saintal » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:11 pm
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:12 pm
by areaman » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:16 pm
by UK Fan » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:20 pm
whufc wrote:Depending on who you speak to Centrals are far from a yes as well
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:23 pm
UK Fan wrote:whufc wrote:Depending on who you speak to Centrals are far from a yes as well
Bring your cricket bat on Saturday if true whufc .
by OxCamBlues » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:25 pm
UK Fan wrote:whufc wrote:Depending on who you speak to Centrals are far from a yes as well
Bring your cricket bat on Saturday if true whufc .
by whufc » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:30 pm
OxCamBlues wrote:UK Fan wrote:whufc wrote:Depending on who you speak to Centrals are far from a yes as well
Bring your cricket bat on Saturday if true whufc .
Threats of violence towards the GFC President and insinuating the same with suggestions that people bring the willow along to a game of SANFL footy do your credibility as one of the figureheads of the 'No AFL in the SANFL' no favours UK Fan.
I personally think it's admiral that you and many others feel so strongly about a competition that we all love but I also believe you need to wind your neck in a touch.
by OxCamBlues » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:33 pm
by Ian » Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:35 pm
Bohdan pretty much said that last night at the North members info light, there will be a committee to sort the finer details after it is approvedsaintal wrote:So basically clubs are going to vote (albeit conditionally) on an unfinished model/proposal, and many of the finer details (including financial modelling!) are yet to be determined.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |