lachlan wrote:My Mail was that Mickeljohn was going to Sturt.
I was also hearing Sturt, ad Central as well ???
Port Magpies
Re: Port Magpies
by Big Phil » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:15 pm
I was also hearing Sturt, ad Central as well ???
-
Big Phil - Coach
- Posts: 20297
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
- Has liked: 121 times
- Been liked: 284 times
Re: Port Magpies
by Barto » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:38 pm
whufc wrote:any clues as to which SANFL had Micklejohn signed then?
No, none at all.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
Re: Port Magpies
by therisingblues » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:15 pm
Barto wrote:whatever wrote:I wonder if the magpies will chase Giles as they need a ruckman.
Micklejohn will not be playing in SA next year if my mail is correct.
Correct.
He had reached agreement with another SANFL club but Port would not come to the party no matter what the transfer fee being offered, they'd rather crush him into a cube than trade him in.
Has agreed to play for a WAFL club if not redrafted.
Is that true? Pretty ugly thinking if so.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
-
therisingblues - Coach
-
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
- Location: Fukuoka
- Has liked: 369 times
- Been liked: 514 times
- Grassroots Team: Hope Valley
Re: Port Magpies
by spell_check » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:31 pm
Ooh, lucky we didn't bother chasing him, going for Parry instead.
- spell_check
- Coach
-
- Posts: 18817
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
- Has liked: 48 times
- Been liked: 226 times
Re: Port Magpies
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:05 am
Ahhhh yes the old Magpie tradition at it's best.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Re: Port Magpies
by NO-MERCY » Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:24 pm
Barto wrote:Correct.
He had reached agreement with another SANFL club but Port would not come to the party no matter what the transfer fee being offered, they'd rather crush him into a cube than trade him in.
Has agreed to play for a WAFL club if not redrafted.
May get picked up by Port Power.
Re: Port Magpies
by bayman » Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:58 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Barto wrote:Correct.
He had reached agreement with another SANFL club but Port would not come to the party no matter what the transfer fee being offered, they'd rather crush him into a cube than trade him in.
Has agreed to play for a WAFL club if not redrafted.
May get picked up by Port Power.
if that happened which sanfl club would he be assigned to ?
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
- bayman
- Coach
-
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
- Location: home
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: Plympton
Re: Port Magpies
by bayman » Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:10 pm
redandblack wrote:Port Magpies, surely.
but hasn't he left them ?
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
- bayman
- Coach
-
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
- Location: home
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: Plympton
Re: Port Magpies
by Barto » Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:34 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Barto wrote:Correct.
He had reached agreement with another SANFL club but Port would not come to the party no matter what the transfer fee being offered, they'd rather crush him into a cube than trade him in.
Has agreed to play for a WAFL club if not redrafted.
May get picked up by Port Power.
I've heard that one as well. Probably the only way the Magpies will see him next year.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
Re: Port Magpies
by geppscrossrams » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:12 pm
Barto wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Barto wrote:Correct.
He had reached agreement with another SANFL club but Port would not come to the party no matter what the transfer fee being offered, they'd rather crush him into a cube than trade him in.
Has agreed to play for a WAFL club if not redrafted.
May get picked up by Port Power.
I've heard that one as well. Probably the only way the Magpies will see him next year.
If Port Power were interested in Meiklejohn, then why wasn't he named on their train-on list?
- geppscrossrams
- Under 16s
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:58 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 4 times
- Grassroots Team: Gepps Cross
Re: Port Magpies
by Booney » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:15 pm
Secret squirrel stuff...
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
Re: Port Magpies
by CoverKing » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:21 pm
geppscrossrams wrote:Barto wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Barto wrote:Correct.
He had reached agreement with another SANFL club but Port would not come to the party no matter what the transfer fee being offered, they'd rather crush him into a cube than trade him in.
Has agreed to play for a WAFL club if not redrafted.
May get picked up by Port Power.
I've heard that one as well. Probably the only way the Magpies will see him next year.
If Port Power were interested in Meiklejohn, then why wasn't he named on their train-on list?
According to the tiser, which is probably incorrect as usual, they offered Meiklejohn a chance to train with the squad, however he is overseas and unable to do so!
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
Re: Port Magpies
by Wedgie » Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:35 pm
Booney wrote:Secret squirrel stuff...
More like Morocco Mole with the parties invovled.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Re: Port Magpies
by Booney » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:04 pm
Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Secret squirrel stuff...
More like Morocco Mole with the parties invovled.
We weren't always a mess..
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
Re: Port Magpies
by Barto » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:36 pm
CoverKing wrote:According to the tiser, which is probably incorrect as usual, they offered Meiklejohn a chance to train with the squad, however he is overseas and unable to do so!
The nullarbor used to be a sea millions of years ago I guess.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
Re: Port Magpies
by aceman » Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:07 pm
The Magpies are rich, South's just paid them $11K for a player Port didn't want and burnt, Josh Taylor. Someone's made a mistake!
Always behind the 8 ball
-
aceman - Coach
-
- Posts: 5481
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
- Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Port Magpies
by UK Fan » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:28 am
aceman wrote:The Magpies are rich, South's just paid them $11K for a player Port didn't want and burnt, Josh Taylor. Someone's made a mistake!
Well thats Bamford wage plus expenses covered then.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
Re: Port Magpies
by Bunton » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:59 am
aceman wrote:The Magpies are rich, South's just paid them $11K for a player Port didn't want and burnt, Josh Taylor. Someone's made a mistake!
Is this the 190cm key position player that Port spent most of last year trying to get back from Gepps Cross?
South are said to have got $70K for 2 players they did not want!
What say we wait and see how all these guys go before we start barring up at the prospect that "someone may have made a mistake"?
PS - the $20K I have been reliably advised South got for Chris Hall is looking like a pretty good outcome now!
Re: Port Magpies
by NO-MERCY » Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:35 pm
Port Magpie hyreichy seen chatting with former magarey medallist Tony Brown at the 20\20 cricket sat night.
Could there be a possible return for season 2010?
Could there be a possible return for season 2010?
Board index
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mots02 and 19 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management