glenelg v central

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Sam_goUUUdogs » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:45 pm

Dutchy wrote:so did you have an "off" day in October last year???


going on the form the couple games before i would say yes, but the mark of a good side is those that pounce on Centrals when they have an off day, Sturt did that this year, i just cant see Centrals giving them a sniff again.
''I can't think back to a time where Australia have been so convincingly beaten'' - Mark Taylor in regards to the 2010/11 Ashes series.
User avatar
Sam_goUUUdogs
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby sturt1 » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:19 pm

The bays are a big chance to get closer than norwood did. The key is not losing douglas this week because then, they wont get closer than norwood.

Cant wait to use the scoreline as part of my signiture.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: glenelg v central

Postby am Bays » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:29 pm

sturt1 wrote:The bays are a big chance to get closer than norwood did. The key is not losing douglas this week because then, they wont get closer than norwood.

Cant wait to use the scoreline as part of my signiture.


Hmm I don't know which post to take more seriously the one above or this one from April 24....

We have just become the best team in the comp. Good luck to any other team trying to beat Port at alberton this season. Sturt are the greatest
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19692
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2112 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Dutchy » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:29 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
sturt1 wrote:The bays are a big chance to get closer than norwood did. The key is not losing douglas this week because then, they wont get closer than norwood.

Cant wait to use the scoreline as part of my signiture.


Hmm I don't know which post to take more seriously the one above or this one from April 24....

We have just become the best team in the comp. Good luck to any other team trying to beat Port at alberton this season. Sturt are the greatest


Gold Tassie...Gold!!!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46165
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2621 times
Been liked: 4288 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Dutchy » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:30 pm

Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
Dutchy wrote:so did you have an "off" day in October last year???


going on the form the couple games before i would say yes, but the mark of a good side is those that pounce on Centrals when they have an off day, Sturt did that this year, i just cant see Centrals giving them a sniff again.


An off day in a grand final???? :? ....I honestly dont think there is such a thing!!! :shock:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46165
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2621 times
Been liked: 4288 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Sam_goUUUdogs » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:38 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
Dutchy wrote:so did you have an "off" day in October last year???


going on the form the couple games before i would say yes, but the mark of a good side is those that pounce on Centrals when they have an off day, Sturt did that this year, i just cant see Centrals giving them a sniff again.


An off day in a grand final???? :? ....I honestly dont think there is such a thing!!! :shock:


So you think that Centrals were truely an 125 point better side than the Eagles in 2004? you dont think the Eagles might have just had one of those days, where nothing goes right, yet everything goes right for the opposition, considering they were good enough to get to the GF, i would suggest they were better than they showed on the day.
''I can't think back to a time where Australia have been so convincingly beaten'' - Mark Taylor in regards to the 2010/11 Ashes series.
User avatar
Sam_goUUUdogs
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Grahaml » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:48 pm

Richard Williams had one of those days in the 2005 GF.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Dutchy » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:48 pm

I believe if any game is a true reflection of form its in the GF, I dont think motivation or having an "off day" can come into a GF
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46165
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2621 times
Been liked: 4288 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby am Bays » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:31 pm

Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Jimmy wrote:dutchy mate, i would love for the gays to smash the dogs but it aint happening, dream and believe all you like, i hope it comes true but its all in ya head mate.

sorry. 8)

*thud*


would like to know why you think Sturt can beat the Dogs but not Glenelg?



I dont think they could do it again, doubt Centrals will have another off day like that.Would be intrested to know how many games from this point in the season the Dogs have dropped in the past few years, i know it was none in 2005, and probably only 1-2 in 04 and 06.


Do you think it wasn't so much centrals having an off day compared to Sturt putting the pressure on and running all day so centrals were able to play well.

Yes teams have "bad days" but that is often the product of the opposition team not not allowing them to play well. You have to admit Sturt played well that day and if any other team (on their day) plays as well or better than what Sturt did they will more than likely beat Centrals (or any other opposition) too.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19692
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2112 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby MST » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:39 pm

Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
Dutchy wrote:so did you have an "off" day in October last year???


going on the form the couple games before i would say yes, but the mark of a good side is those that pounce on Centrals when they have an off day, Sturt did that this year, i just cant see Centrals giving them a sniff again.


I just love the fact that some Central supporters HONESTLY believe that when their side loses, granted it is not that often, it was all down to the Dogs having an 'off day'.

Is it not posssible they were beaten by the better side on the day, considering many pundits and fans thought it was one of the best SANFL contests of the last few years??

Geeeez. I guess it is hard for young bucks like sam to be anything BUT arrogant considering they have only seen success, because they are too young to remember when Central were mere mortals and really battled.....
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: glenelg v central

Postby JK » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:44 pm

I can't comment on the Sturt v Central game because I didn't see it ... But I can say that I think Norwood played equally as poorly in our last two games, against Sturt and Central and there was a 93 point difference in the winning margin.

The two times I've seen Central live this year and once on TV they are miles ahead of anyone else in the comp and barring a spate of injuries or another team like North or the Eagles getting their full quota of players back and running into some HOT form, I think they'll be capable of destroying anyone at anytime.

(Thats not meant to knock Sturts achievements so far, and to come* this year either MST)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: glenelg v central

Postby MightyEagles » Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:02 pm

I'm putting my money on the dogs, even though footy can bring up results that people don't expect, like when Glenelg def Central at Adelaide Oval last year.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Re: glenelg v central

Postby MST » Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:09 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:I can't comment on the Sturt v Central game because I didn't see it ... But I can say that I think Norwood played equally as poorly in our last two games, against Sturt and Central and there was a 93 point difference in the winning margin.

The two times I've seen Central live this year and once on TV they are miles ahead of anyone else in the comp and barring a spate of injuries or another team like North or the Eagles getting their full quota of players back and running into some HOT form, I think they'll be capable of destroying anyone at anytime.

(Thats not meant to knock Sturts achievements so far, and to come* this year either MST)


I take what you are saying CP but I would have to disagree with your statement that Norwood were just as poor against the Dogs as they were the week before v Sturt. League football sides should never concede 34 goals, unless of course they play totally disinterested, poor, passionless footy.

Central are a super side and on any given day can mete out a hiding to any side in the competition, but Sturt proved a few weeks back that a four quarter effort, filled with character and committment, can match it with the Dogs. That goes for any side.

Unfortunately the more contributions I read of young Sam GUD, the more I believe he is just a young fella who loves his footy, in particular his Bulldogs, but in reality knows very little about the game of Australian Rules Football.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Grahaml » Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:33 pm

MST, that's one of the truly dumbest posts I've seen in my life. Of course he was saying Sturt were the better team on the day. What he was saying was that Sturt were the better team because in part Central were down a little. Central is the best team in the comp. When at their best, no other team can beat them. Stands to reason to beat them you have to get them off their best game. Sturt can take some credit for doing just that, but to expect that the next time you play us it will be easily replicated is looking at the world through double blue coloured glasses.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby MST » Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:02 pm

Grahaml wrote:MST, that's one of the truly dumbest posts I've seen in my life. Of course he was saying Sturt were the better team on the day. What he was saying was that Sturt were the better team because in part Central were down a little. Central is the best team in the comp. When at their best, no other team can beat them. Stands to reason to beat them you have to get them off their best game. Sturt can take some credit for doing just that, but to expect that the next time you play us it will be easily replicated is looking at the world through double blue coloured glasses.


From Sam, in an earlier post, referring to Central's loss at Unley;
I dont think they could do it again, doubt Centrals will have another off day like that.
Would be intrested to know how many games from this point in the season the Dogs have dropped in the past few years, i know it was none in 2005, and probably only 1-2 in 04 and 06.[/quote]

Not for one minute do I harbour any false illusions that I am in the same scholastic stratosphere as your good self Graham, so please accept my most humble of apologies and indeed, correct me if I am mistaken, but that statement from young Samuel does not go close to even hinting that Sturt were the better side on the day.

Now as I stated, I am but a mere dumby in the shadow of yourself and my previous "Dumb" post serves only to reinforce that.

I am however just on the right side of being a complete and utter dimwit and as such that does allow me to determine that you just love to be argumentative, for the sake of being so.

May I retire gracefully on 270 something posts of stupidity from this site, the same site that is enriched by geniuses like Grahaml?
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Sam_goUUUdogs » Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:07 pm

Yes Centrals didnt have a good day, but as i said early the mark of a good side is those that take their chances and pounce on that, as Sturt did, Centrals have had a couple other games like that this year, but opposition has not been good enough.
My honest opinion is Centrals will not give the opposition that chance to pounce again this season.
''I can't think back to a time where Australia have been so convincingly beaten'' - Mark Taylor in regards to the 2010/11 Ashes series.
User avatar
Sam_goUUUdogs
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Grahaml » Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:15 pm

OMG. Let me ask you this. If, in a 2 team game, one team is worse than the other, what does that mean? Surely the other team must be the BETTER side. Your insistince that we use terms glowing in praise of Sturt smacks of self indulgence on your part. Surely even you're not that naive to think that all sides play their best every week? Do you honestly think Centrals had a good day? Do you also think that Centrals will not be any better the next time they play Sturt? While nothing is ever certain, even you must surely be expecting that the dogs will be harder to beat at the next meeting.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:18 pm

MST wrote: From Sam, in an earlier post, referring to Central's loss at Unley;
I dont think they could do it again, doubt Centrals will have another off day like that.


Selective quoting on your behalf MST.

How about this one, giving Sturt a mark for being a good side - being able to knock Centrals off on a bad day.

Sam_goUUUdogs wrote: but the mark of a good side is those that pounce on Centrals when they have an off day, Sturt did that this year, i just cant see Centrals giving them a sniff again.


Admittedly, I too thought Sam was being a little cocky with some of his posts.

Let's remember though that prior to Sturt beating Centrals, people were asking "who was going to do it?". A lot of unbiased supporters are STILL asking questions along those lines. Those people must also believe the Dogs had an 'off day' against Sturt.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: glenelg v central

Postby Sam_goUUUdogs » Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:20 pm

MST wrote:
Grahaml wrote:MST, that's one of the truly dumbest posts I've seen in my life. Of course he was saying Sturt were the better team on the day. What he was saying was that Sturt were the better team because in part Central were down a little. Central is the best team in the comp. When at their best, no other team can beat them. Stands to reason to beat them you have to get them off their best game. Sturt can take some credit for doing just that, but to expect that the next time you play us it will be easily replicated is looking at the world through double blue coloured glasses.


From Sam, in an earlier post, referring to Central's loss at Unley;
I dont think they could do it again, doubt Centrals will have another off day like that.
Would be intrested to know how many games from this point in the season the Dogs have dropped in the past few years, i know it was none in 2005, and probably only 1-2 in 04 and 06.


Not for one minute do I harbour any false illusions that I am in the same scholastic stratosphere as your good self Graham, so please accept my most humble of apologies and indeed, correct me if I am mistaken, but that statement from young Samuel does not go close to even hinting that Sturt were the better side on the day.
[/quote]

actually i think its very close, just worded diffrently and in more detail.
why would i need to hint that Sturt were better on the day? does the scoreboard not already reflect that?
or are some people just looking for some more validation after abit of a reality check on the weekend, and maybe now agree with what i've said deep down and just dont want to admit it.
''I can't think back to a time where Australia have been so convincingly beaten'' - Mark Taylor in regards to the 2010/11 Ashes series.
User avatar
Sam_goUUUdogs
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: glenelg v central

Postby MST » Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:40 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Jimmy wrote:dutchy mate, i would love for the gays to smash the dogs but it aint happening, dream and believe all you like, i hope it comes true but its all in ya head mate.

sorry. 8)

*thud*


would like to know why you think Sturt can beat the Dogs but not Glenelg?



I dont think they could do it again, doubt Centrals will have another off day like that.Would be intrested to know how many games from this point in the season the Dogs have dropped in the past few years, i know it was none in 2005, and probably only 1-2 in 04 and 06.


Do you think it wasn't so much centrals having an off day compared to Sturt putting the pressure on and running all day so centrals were able to play well.

Yes teams have "bad days" but that is often the product of the opposition team not not allowing them to play well. You have to admit Sturt played well that day and if any other team (on their day) plays as well or better than what Sturt did they will more than likely beat Centrals (or any other opposition) too.


For fear of fighting out of my weight division, and the fact that I am intimidated by your intelligence, perhaps I am better to borrow a quote from another regular on this site, if that is permitted oh Grahaml, oh wise one?

The Tassie Medallist puts it better than I ever could.

To answer a couple of your questions, NO I don't need any glowing praise to validate my opinions and YES, I do believe it will be more difficult to topple the Dogs out at the Ponderossa.

I move for a motion that you, Dutchy, Drebin and a couple of others form a rebel tour and have your very own footysa.com site. It could be called, "Argumentative.com" or "Everything I say is gospel.com" or even, specifically for you graham, "I choose to act like CDFC have always dominated the SANFL and refuse to be humble by recognising that my side used to be a laughing stock.com"

Bored now.

Go the Bays on the weekend.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: arthur and 11 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |