SA Footy

Anyone seen a Jack Oatey Medalist market?

Spargo wrote:Anyone seen a Jack Oatey Medalist market?

Crownbet mate

Jared Petrenko - Eagles
4.50
Zane Kirkwood - Sturt
5.50
Nick O'Brien - Eagles
6.50
James Boyd - Eagles
7.00
Aiden Riley - Sturt
8.00
Brodie Martin - Sturt
12.00
Jarred Allmond - Eagles
14.00
James Battersby - Sturt
16.00
Luke Jarrad - Eagles
16.00
Scott McMahon - Sturt
17.00
Angas Rowntree - Eagles
21.00
Chris Hall - Eagles
21.00
Jack Gaffney - Eagles
21.00
Mark Evans - Sturt
26.00
Kory Beard - Sturt
26.00
Lachlan McGregor - Eagles
26.00
Angas Poole - Eagles
34.00
Luke Thompson - Eagles
34.00
Ben Hansen - Sturt
41.00
Josh Hone - Sturt
41.00
Phill Raymond - Eagles
41.00
Jarrod Lienert - Sturt
51.00
Matt Goldsworthy - Eagles
51.00
Scott Lewis - Eagles
51.00
Jack Stephens - Sturt
51.00
Fraser Evans - Sturt
51.00
Nicholas Hayes - Eagles
51.00
John Greenslade - Sturt
67.00
Michael Wundke - Eagles
67.00
Andrew Ainger - Eagles
67.00
Thomas Harms - Sturt
67.00
Guy Page - Sturt
67.00
Marc Borholm - Eagles
101.00
Jack Osborne - Sturt
101.00
Jake Von Bertouch - Eagles
101.00
Matt Crocker - Sturt
101.00

WHo is the value there? Jarrad? Hall? Lewis? - presuming WWT get up

Dutchy wrote:WHo is the value there? Jarrad? Hall? Lewis? - presuming WWT get up

I took Goldsworthy and Rowntree for the Eagles, and McMahon and Fraser Evans for Sturt. Evans just because I really rate him.

Allmond.

Booney wrote:Allmond.

Wrong thread for nut talk.

lachie Mcgregor will win it when he kicks 6 goals

Kirkwood /Petrenko likely winners.

Riley could be a real chance. My real roughie is Tom Harms.

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Kirkwood /Petrenko likely winners.

Riley could be a real chance. My real roughie is Tom Harms.

Petrenko hasn't really had a big game for quite a number of weeks and is a bit out of form to be honest. I think he is rated favourite more so because he has a higher profile amongst the punters given his time with the Crows than other eagles players. O'brien or Boyd (if he plays) would be our clear favourites in my mind. However, Allmond probably represents the best value for the Eagles.

For Sturt, I like Battersby at $14. Sturt supporters would have more insight than I but he always seems to get far more of the ball than Riley and is more damaging yet Riley seems to get more of the accolades?

Anyone give Sturts best from the Prelim a chance? Sydney Swan.

I believe this might only be the fourth GF since 1896 that red or black has not been a colour of one of the participating teams.
I'm sure "Spellcheck" could confirm or correct.

Battersby and McMahon look good value for Sturt. Poole a decent roughie for the Eags.

ferret wrote:I believe this might only be the fourth GF since 1896 that red or black has not been a colour of one of the participating teams.
I'm sure "Spellcheck" could confirm or correct.

Considering only Sturt, Eagles and South don't have black or red in their colours it's not really a big deal.

Mr Fuller wrote:

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Kirkwood /Petrenko likely winners.

Riley could be a real chance. My real roughie is Tom Harms.

Petrenko hasn't really had a big game for quite a number of weeks and is a bit out of form to be honest. I think he is rated favourite more so because he has a higher profile amongst the punters given his time with the Crows than other eagles players. O'brien or Boyd (if he plays) would be our clear favourites in my mind. However, Allmond probably represents the best value for the Eagles.

For Sturt, I like Battersby at $14. Sturt supporters would have more insight than I but he always seems to get far more of the ball than Riley and is more damaging yet Riley seems to get more of the accolades?

Riley is more bash and crash. With a couple of games under his belt he could be in for a big one... Both teams have the two best midfields in the comp.

Wedgie wrote:

ferret wrote:I believe this might only be the fourth GF since 1896 that red or black has not been a colour of one of the participating teams.
I'm sure "Spellcheck" could confirm or correct.

Considering only Sturt, Eagles and South don't have black or red in their colours it's not really a big deal.

Torrens beat Sturt in 1924.
Sturt beat South 1940.
By my count this is only the third time that the colours red nor black have not been represented on Grand Final day.

JK wrote:

Spargo wrote:Anyone seen a Jack Oatey Medalist market?

Crownbet mate

Jared Petrenko - Eagles
4.50
Zane Kirkwood - Sturt
5.50
Nick O'Brien - Eagles
6.50
James Boyd - Eagles
7.00
Aiden Riley - Sturt
8.00
Brodie Martin - Sturt
12.00
Jarred Allmond - Eagles
14.00
James Battersby - Sturt
16.00
Luke Jarrad - Eagles
16.00
Scott McMahon - Sturt
17.00
Angas Rowntree - Eagles
21.00
Chris Hall - Eagles
21.00
Jack Gaffney - Eagles
21.00
Mark Evans - Sturt
26.00
Kory Beard - Sturt
26.00
Lachlan McGregor - Eagles
26.00
Angas Poole - Eagles
34.00
Luke Thompson - Eagles
34.00
Ben Hansen - Sturt
41.00
Josh Hone - Sturt
41.00
Phill Raymond - Eagles
41.00
Jarrod Lienert - Sturt
51.00
Matt Goldsworthy - Eagles
51.00
Scott Lewis - Eagles
51.00
Jack Stephens - Sturt
51.00
Fraser Evans - Sturt
51.00
Nicholas Hayes - Eagles
51.00
John Greenslade - Sturt
67.00
Michael Wundke - Eagles
67.00
Andrew Ainger - Eagles
67.00
Thomas Harms - Sturt
67.00
Guy Page - Sturt
67.00
Marc Borholm - Eagles
101.00
Jack Osborne - Sturt
101.00
Jake Von Bertouch - Eagles
101.00
Matt Crocker - Sturt
101.00

What if there player you want to back is not on that list?

therisingblues wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

ferret wrote:I believe this might only be the fourth GF since 1896 that red or black has not been a colour of one of the participating teams.
I'm sure "Spellcheck" could confirm or correct.

Considering only Sturt, Eagles and South don't have black or red in their colours it's not really a big deal.

Torrens beat Sturt in 1924.
Sturt beat South 1940.
By my count this is only the third time that the colours red nor black have not been represented on Grand Final day.

True, but even more extraordinary is it's the first grand Final a team with yellow blue and green meets a team with two blues!

Let's not down play the importance of this either!

Wedgie wrote:

therisingblues wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

ferret wrote:I believe this might only be the fourth GF since 1896 that red or black has not been a colour of one of the participating teams.
I'm sure "Spellcheck" could confirm or correct.

Considering only Sturt, Eagles and South don't have black or red in their colours it's not really a big deal.

Torrens beat Sturt in 1924.
Sturt beat South 1940.
By my count this is only the third time that the colours red nor black have not been represented on Grand Final day.

True, but even more extraordinary is it's the first grand Final a team with yellow blue and green meets a team with two blues!

Actually you are right. By Sunday evening Sturt would have played every other heritage club in a grand final at least once.
How many other clubs have done that?
EDIT
Sturt's Grand Final results. Current heritage clubs highlighted in bold.
1910/1965/1998 Port d Sturt
1915/1966/1967/1968/1976 Sturt d Port
1919/1926/1932 Sturt d North
1923/1978 Norwood d Sturt
1931 North d Sturt
1924 Torrens d Sturt
1940 Sturt d South
1969/1970/1974 Sturt d Glenelg
1983 West d Sturt
2002 Sturt d Central
2009 Central d Sturt

Add the Eagles to that list by Sunday evening.

ferret wrote:I believe this might only be the fourth GF since 1896 that red or black has not been a colour of one of the participating teams.
I'm sure "Spellcheck" could confirm or correct.

1898 - Port v South