by whufc » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:18 pm
by VALE PARK » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:37 pm
by whufc » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:40 pm
VALE PARK wrote:Maybe they should change some soccer rules,IMHO not enough goals are scored and too much staging for frees!
by Wedgie » Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:20 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by whufc » Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:40 pm
Wedgie wrote:Not sure what you're on about, there's been heaps of rule changes to all those sports you mentioned along with proposed changes and different formats especially basketball!
by saintal » Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:21 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Nothing wrong with a 8 goal to 9 slugfest on a mudpatch in the middle of winter, which can be uniquely entertaining. Plenty wrong with it on the dry surfaces in autumn and spring.
[b]One rule change I think they could trial is not to allow anyone else in the centre square bounce until the ball has been cleared of the square. Might make for less secondary-bounces and more attacking mindset and clearances like we used to see. Not 100% convinced it'll work, but worth a try.
by whufc » Thu Feb 25, 2016 3:21 am
saintal wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Nothing wrong with a 8 goal to 9 slugfest on a mudpatch in the middle of winter, which can be uniquely entertaining. Plenty wrong with it on the dry surfaces in autumn and spring.
[b]One rule change I think they could trial is not to allow anyone else in the centre square bounce until the ball has been cleared of the square. Might make for less secondary-bounces and more attacking mindset and clearances like we used to see. Not 100% convinced it'll work, but worth a try.
Yes, I recall Sam Newman harping on about this one many, many years ago. Definitely worth a trial.
by HeartBeatsTrue » Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:13 am
VALE PARK wrote:Maybe they should change some soccer rules,IMHO not enough goals are scored and too much staging for frees!
by VALE PARK » Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:09 pm
by Booney » Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:28 pm
VALE PARK wrote:Yes a free to the forward team.
Also remember the new rule is not like basketball last touch off hands etc.
Some miss information is about on this.
For a free kick to be awarded (other than deliberate out of bounds by any meams that has been in forever)
to the opposition the ball must be untouched off a boot and go over the boundary.
I reckon lucky if there will be 4/5 a game.
The positive effect of this rule will be the players will not regularly go defensively down the boundary all day.
Watch the increase in goals scored.
The SANFL know more than me so they will probably change their mind and can it though.
Then bring it in for 2017 and waste a year!
by therisingblues » Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:37 pm
whufc wrote:Why is it with Aussie Rules we believe it is the best game on earth yet there are consistently talks around rule changes all year round, the chatter comes from the AFL, the media, fans on forum etc etc
I find it strange because i go on alot of 'soccer' forums and you never get much chat around rule changes and that the fans are generally very happy with the way the game is played
*i know soccer is not everyones cup of tea and no one is going to convince one other to prefer the other sport etc etc but im just comparing the mentality of rules needing to be changed.
by bennymacca » Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:48 pm
by whufc » Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:58 pm
bennymacca wrote:I think there is a difference though. Soccer seems to accept that boring 0-0 draws are a small, but inevitable occurrence. They dont try to legislate them out of the game.
If the AFL were running soccer they would have zones to stop people parking the bus, etc
by bennymacca » Thu Feb 25, 2016 4:06 pm
by whufc » Thu Feb 25, 2016 4:29 pm
bennymacca wrote:Interesting article about the English football system, and i can see the corollary here. Especially the parts about being modern but traditional at the same time. That seems to describe the SANFL quite well
http://www.espnfc.com/blog/espn-fc-unit ... big-issues
by Bounce of the ball » Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:41 pm
Booney wrote:VALE PARK wrote:Yes a free to the forward team.
Also remember the new rule is not like basketball last touch off hands etc.
Some miss information is about on this.
For a free kick to be awarded (other than deliberate out of bounds by any meams that has been in forever)
to the opposition the ball must be untouched off a boot and go over the boundary.
I reckon lucky if there will be 4/5 a game.
The positive effect of this rule will be the players will not regularly go defensively down the boundary all day.
Watch the increase in goals scored.
The SANFL know more than me so they will probably change their mind and can it though.
Then bring it in for 2017 and waste a year!
No, it will increase congestion in the midfield. Coaches will instruct players to go central when they lose possession and give the opposition space out wide hoping errors will occur and turnover the ball, or, forcing the opposition to take the long way home. Just as footy was turning a corner to be more attacking through the middle of the ground.
So by crowding the corridor you've gone against what we all believe is the best way to score quickly and heavily, straight down the guts!
by Booney » Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:51 pm
by VALE PARK » Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:53 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Thu Feb 25, 2016 6:05 pm
VALE PARK wrote:They simply won't know,you may go down the boundary after all!
by cracka » Thu Feb 25, 2016 7:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |