johntheclaret wrote:Happy Endings wrote:johntheclaret wrote:in response to jtc's pre-match prediction, Happy Endings wrote:This post is hilarious

Yeah I noticed you were game enough post after the result

You were 20 goals off. it would have been tough for me to post on that prior to the result

And your tip was. Oh that's right you make one.
But you're right. It shows I NFI
I take my hat off to you John.
To borrow from cricket parlance, a couple of even tempered taps back to the bowler when smacking consecutive 'pies' over the grandstand would have been so tempting.
Aaaanyway ..... I don't think too many of us punters would have openly predicted yesterday's margin. FWIW, holding Retz to a few goals is not easy when his side is so dominant, so one or two of your guys can hold their heads high.
spell_check wrote:I notice that North had 1.2 (8) to 3QT; the last time North were in single figures at 3QT was the 1914 FInal against Port (0.

. Since then, this has been only the 17th occasion (all post WW1) this has been done. And only the fourth since a lower 3QT score (than the 8 points) was kicked (1.1 by Norwood in the 1988 2nd Semi)
North were sat on 8 points for about five minutes short of two quarters (early second to early last.)