by whufc » Tue May 21, 2013 10:32 pm
by kickinit » Tue May 21, 2013 11:25 pm
whufc wrote:Umm those extra kids will go on to play reserves and league football because league footballers retire, move on, switch clubs etc etc they will need to be replaced by someone, that will be the reserves and 18,a as they filter through.
What your forgetting as well is that each college is only going to be able to offer and play a certain amount of kids.
The other recruiting benefit SANFL offers which college football can't is the opportunity to impress against men and against other AFL listed players.
There will also always be footballers like Josh Glenn at Centrals who colleges have no idea about and was playing div4 ammos last year, he is now dominating at league level and would definatly have scouts taking a look.
by whufc » Wed May 22, 2013 6:37 am
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:Umm those extra kids will go on to play reserves and league football because league footballers retire, move on, switch clubs etc etc they will need to be replaced by someone, that will be the reserves and 18,a as they filter through.
What your forgetting as well is that each college is only going to be able to offer and play a certain amount of kids.
The other recruiting benefit SANFL offers which college football can't is the opportunity to impress against men and against other AFL listed players.
There will also always be footballers like Josh Glenn at Centrals who colleges have no idea about and was playing div4 ammos last year, he is now dominating at league level and would definatly have scouts taking a look.
but your not going to have a full team retire at the same time, you also have to include players that get delisted from AFL clubs, players moving from interstate and players who are currently playing amateur football now deciding to have a crack at playing sanfl. You also take into account that not every player playing college football is going to be drafted into the afl. So at the end of the day if the majority of the best kids are being taken by the college system it doesn't leave too many quality players left for the sanfl.
by Strawb » Wed May 22, 2013 8:12 am
LEH wrote:Yeah, it is a hypothetical but you get the gist, yeah?
This is the problem essentially with the concept of AFL Reserves Teams.
There is no reward for development of players within a Club's Zoned Areas - Port Magpies & whoever (let's say Sturt) don't need to do much at all really, they will get AFL quality players, with AFL quality training & medical assistance - not to mention the facilities.
Now, Victorians would say "Welcome to our World" but they never had to change/move the goal posts.
Their competition just expanded by removing 2 clubs out of Melbourne (South & Fitzroy) & gaining extra Interstate Clubs.
The VFA was a good quality competition in it's own right - they fielded a team in Div 2 of State Carnivals that was always very competitive.
The VFA was poorly managed and broke by the time the mergers happened. A lot of teams in the then VFA are no longer teams or back in local comps. Geelong West went broke and is now Geelong West St. Peters.
The VFA competition has been ruined by the removal of the VFL/AFL Reserves Competition.
(FFS, they have 2 x Teams that are the Tigers competing in the same competition! What a joke!)
Werribee always have been the Tigers. Coburg became the Tigers because of Richmond.
We are in danger of becoming AFLSA - that is what Dimetripoo wants.
OUR Sport of 'Australian Rules Football' has been branded "AFL" - they have been very clever in doing this.
Kids refer to the sport as "AFL" now. The 'Northern States' refer to it too.
If we don't fight to maintain the integrity of our competition - then we are doomed to go the way of the VFA & sadly (it appears) the WAFL.
This is NOT an Anti-Port, or Anti-Crows thing - in fact I would not be overly unhappy if they fielded their Reserves Teams in the SANFL Reserves competition, I would prefer not but that might be a reasonable compromise.
What is MOST concerning is the 'deafening silence' coming from the SANFL - where is their response to the issue?
This suggests the decision has already been made.
In 1990, the SANFL fought 'tooth & nail' to stop PAFC joining the VFL - all in the name of "keeping our competition a viable one with integrity".
Why are they not doing the same now? The cynic in me would say "$$$$$".
Is this issue any different to the Coles & Woolies Duopoly issue?
The 'big boys' forcing the 'little guy' out of business, for greed & just because they can.
by Harry the Horse » Wed May 22, 2013 11:25 am
LEH wrote:
What is MOST concerning is the 'deafening silence' coming from the SANFL - where is their response to the issue?
This suggests the decision has already been made.
by JK » Wed May 22, 2013 12:27 pm
Harry the Horse wrote:LEH wrote:
What is MOST concerning is the 'deafening silence' coming from the SANFL - where is their response to the issue?
This suggests the decision has already been made.
Agreed. Rob Chapman and Keith Thomas are walking around very smugly at the moment. Don't trust either of them or anyone at the SANFL.
We all know if it is left to a vote of the clubs, as the constitution demands, it won't get up.
But the Crows and Power will be trying to backdoor the SANFL clubs like what happened in Perth.
As long as our SANFL clubs stay strong and united, we will be fine.
I wouldn't care if they all decided to break ranks, dissolve the League and play their own competition.
Sure, they would suffer financially in the short term and more players would leave to take the cash at country clubs, but if it meant a pure competition, the short term pain would be worth the long term gain.
We must not be bullied by AFC and PAFC!
by Lynwood » Wed May 22, 2013 2:06 pm
by beenreal » Wed May 22, 2013 3:17 pm
on the rails wrote:beenreal wrote:PhilH wrote:Wait until next year when all the born and bred WAFL club players have to move to East Perth & Peel.
That is when the fun will really start.
If a "born and bred" WAFL player is so concerned about switching clubs, there's a simple answer. Don't nominate for the draft. He can then stay and play for his local WAFL club and earn WAFL match payments.
Why do you bother posting "shite" like this?
by on the rails » Wed May 22, 2013 3:45 pm
by am Bays » Wed May 22, 2013 4:14 pm
on the rails wrote:As opposed to your typical Port Adelaide selfish attitude??? Seriously it seems you might actually put alot of time and effort into what shite you post on here? You are rivalling dogger for being one of the dumbest people on here and that is saying something to be compared to that plonker!
by Spargo » Wed May 22, 2013 4:20 pm
on the rails wrote:You are rivalling dogger for being one of the dumbest people on here and that is saying something to be compared to that plonker!
by Booney » Wed May 22, 2013 4:27 pm
Spargo wrote:on the rails wrote:You are rivalling dogger for being one of the dumbest people on here and that is saying something to be compared to that plonker!
Are you telling me they are two different people?
by PhilH » Wed May 22, 2013 4:47 pm
by on the rails » Wed May 22, 2013 4:48 pm
by therisingblues » Wed May 22, 2013 4:55 pm
beenreal wrote:on the rails wrote:beenreal wrote:PhilH wrote:Wait until next year when all the born and bred WAFL club players have to move to East Perth & Peel.
That is when the fun will really start.
If a "born and bred" WAFL player is so concerned about switching clubs, there's a simple answer. Don't nominate for the draft. He can then stay and play for his local WAFL club and earn WAFL match payments.
Why do you bother posting "shite" like this?
I write it because narrow minded, insular thinkers like you can't handle the truth. That "born and bred" WAFL player might have grown up barracking for West Coast or Freo but having nominated for the draft gets picked up by an interstate club. What's the difference, he's still playing at club he never supported and will invariably come up against the club he used to.
by Barto » Wed May 22, 2013 5:18 pm
by whufc » Wed May 22, 2013 6:27 pm
Barto wrote:Unlike Beenunreal, Booney gets it. At least under the current system in SA, the SANFL clubs have that consolation that they still get to see a player they developed in the guernsey if they get dropped by their AFL team.
by CUTTERMAN » Wed May 22, 2013 11:41 pm
by westozfalcon » Wed May 22, 2013 11:47 pm
by holden78 » Thu May 23, 2013 9:00 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |