Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby robranisgod » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:48 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:
Wedgie wrote:So Crane expects to walk off the ground straight towards the North bench, abusing a North player who has done the right thing in the opposite direction to what he should be and not cop a serve? Christ, I know I gave him a serve. Could get very ugly if players decide to start chasing other players to their opposition's bench. I'm sure Crane would be very embarrassed with his crying when he sees the tackle on replay too.
I had an awesome view of the whole thing out the front of the glass taj.
No one jumped the fence but don't let a bit of misdirected hysteria stuff up a good story.
Phil Herden made a mistake when he said that in the commentary and by the subsequent pause and then comment about a North official you could tell he realised his mistake.

Wedgie, really. As Clinch has come off the North runner with a blue compression bandage on his leg has come out to him and said something, then as Crane is walking off the runner has moved towards Crane and mouthed off at him. Only then has Crane moved towards the North bench to take issue with the runner. Maybe your clubs' onfield discipline needs to extend to your runner also. Crane has nothing to be embarrassed about mate, he's recieved the ball, turned around and been run into with a poor tackle that's collected him high. It's up to the tackler to make sure the tackle is legal, Clinch didn't, and it should've been a free to Crane. What is embarrassing is the call by some that it should be paid holding the ball! Cranes had no prior opportunity to get rid of the ball before being tackled.
More embarrassing is the North player ducking into a stationary Luke Panozzo in the last 1/4 and milking a free and the umpire falling for it. Have a better look at the footage.


Have you watched the vision yet. It was a perfect tackle around the hips where you are supposed to tackle. A clash of heads has nothing to do with it being a poor tackle. It was one of those things that happens in football.

And I agree that Shannon ducked into Panozzo. That too was a poor decision.
robranisgod
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2056
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:36 pm
Has liked: 94 times
Been liked: 263 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders University

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:35 pm

Watched it many times and I still think its a free any day of the week. If they were both going for a loose ball and clashed heads then that's different, but its a tackle that went wrong and resulted in high contact so it's a free, end of story.
I note that you've stopped on your holding the ball nonsense though. ;)
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby robranisgod » Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:31 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:Watched it many times and I still think its a free any day of the week. If they were both going for a loose ball and clashed heads then that's different, but its a tackle that went wrong and resulted in high contact so it's a free, end of story.
I note that you've stopped on your holding the ball nonsense though. ;)

Holding the ball every day of the week. He had prior opportunity he turned into the tackle, that is where the heads clashed.

As a matter of fact I showed it today to a good ex-league umpire who thought that it should have been holding the ball.

It is Crane's head that contacts Clinch's so how is it possibly a tackle that goes wrong?

It is simply a player not being aware of whose around him.
robranisgod
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2056
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:36 pm
Has liked: 94 times
Been liked: 263 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders University

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:48 pm

YOU ARE DREAMING.
And just as well that umpire isn't out there anymore, we've got enough stooges out there already.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:57 pm

All I know is Crane got smashed, and it was a good day at the footy.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby robranisgod » Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:08 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:YOU ARE DREAMING.
And just as well that umpire isn't out there anymore, we've got enough stooges out there already.

You have obviously never played the game. I'll leave it at that. It is no good even trying to use logic with someone like you. I'll just leave the forum.
robranisgod
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2056
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:36 pm
Has liked: 94 times
Been liked: 263 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders University

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:09 pm

I've noticed cutterman doesn't really like the physical nature of football.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:26 pm

robranisgod wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:YOU ARE DREAMING.
And just as well that umpire isn't out there anymore, we've got enough stooges out there already.

You have obviously never played the game. I'll leave it at that. It is no good even trying to use logic with someone like you. I'll just leave the forum.

Funny, they were my exact thought concerning you!
So many assumptions. :roll:
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Rnd 3 POST GAME Discussion - North v Sturt

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:35 pm

Geez Clinchy nailed Pearce. In Clinch's defence, Pearce was all over the place like a deer on ice.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: northerner and 21 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |