by Dutchy » Mon May 14, 2012 10:19 pm
by Jim05 » Mon May 14, 2012 10:21 pm
by whufc » Mon May 14, 2012 10:53 pm
by csbowes » Mon May 14, 2012 10:58 pm
by csbowes » Mon May 14, 2012 11:18 pm
whufc wrote:8 team comp in near future then?
by whufc » Mon May 14, 2012 11:24 pm
csbowes wrote:whufc wrote:8 team comp in near future then?
Maybe.
I don't know what the financial situation is with other clubs, its one reason why I think all clubs should have to publicise their financial reports to the public, as it would be an interesting read to see where everyone lies.
Has anyone done that in recent memory? As I'm sure between all the posters on here, we could get all of the financial reports of all clubs and have a good look at who is doing well and who isn't...
My general understanding has been...
Centrals - very strong
Glenelg - not sure, maybe just ticking things over
Torrens - ok
South - very strong
North - ok
West - was very strong, but I get the impression they've fallen away
Port - poor
Sturt - poor
Norwood - ok
by csbowes » Mon May 14, 2012 11:35 pm
whufc wrote:Worry for Sturt is in the current state i dont think they will get an overly lot of help from the SANFL or AFL and while some clubs arent as stable as they would like there is very thin chance of a merger option.
No one wants to see Sturt die as imho they are going to have to rebuild on their own. Is Sturt the way through for the Crows to have a reserves side in the SANFL.
by whufc » Mon May 14, 2012 11:42 pm
csbowes wrote:whufc wrote:Worry for Sturt is in the current state i dont think they will get an overly lot of help from the SANFL or AFL and while some clubs arent as stable as they would like there is very thin chance of a merger option.
No one wants to see Sturt die as imho they are going to have to rebuild on their own. Is Sturt the way through for the Crows to have a reserves side in the SANFL.
I must say if we became a Crows reserves team, that'd be it for me...
... I'd find it hard to barrack for that type of team.
I'd have to consider following Port or South if that happened.
That said, I think you talk sense, it'd be an obvious way of getting a reserves team. They take over the club and all their fringe players play there, that'd turn Port into the same sort of feeder club obviously.
by Dutchy » Mon May 14, 2012 11:42 pm
by Sojourner » Tue May 15, 2012 12:14 am
csbowes wrote: Anyway, my point is, I've never really understood why we continually make losses. I know there are difficulties in this climate and that climate, but I'm a simple man (so I'm told) and very much of the belief that you live within your means and don't be overly optimistic with regards targets and so on. You can't be pessimistic, but you can't be optimistic and sometimes I wonder whether the club has been the latter more often than not.
by eddie eagle » Tue May 15, 2012 1:24 am
by am Bays » Tue May 15, 2012 9:41 am
by CUTTERMAN » Tue May 15, 2012 10:09 am
Dutchy wrote:Can you post the Financial Report on here?
by am Bays » Tue May 15, 2012 10:20 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:Can you post the Financial Report on here?
Let's have all of them from every club maybe.
by FOURTH ESTATE » Tue May 15, 2012 11:06 am
on the rails wrote:DOC wrote:Dog_ger wrote:
Can you name a club that is not struggling in todays world..?
![]()
South Adelaide
Debt free are you - should check your financials and see what you owe then come back?
Lucky you got an almost free rent deal with your Oval as well for 99 years - wish we all had the Premier to pull strings! And before you fly off in a hissy fit we had John Bannon when he was Premier as our No. 1 ticket holder and we got diddly squat!
by Dutchy » Tue May 15, 2012 11:07 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:Can you post the Financial Report on here?
Let's have all of them from every club maybe.
by Wedgie » Tue May 15, 2012 11:13 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Tue May 15, 2012 11:26 am
csbowes wrote:I've just read the financial report (as opposed to the annual report which was released a while back)...
... the financial report seems to indicate that in 2011, Sturt took out around $2.5m in loans, which in the end puts the club in a position whereby liabilities are around $250K more than assets. The loss for the year was $412K.
There are notes there suggesting we've written off $170K in unpaid sponsorship... I remember this being spoken about months back, but I haven't heard any details on how it happened, what happened and who it was?
Does anyone know what this loan was for? (or am I reading it wrong)
Did anyone go to the AGM this year and ask about it? (this year was the first time I've missed one in ages)
Also, the final paragraph or so of the financial report indicated that the club might not be able to survive as an ongoing entity, which tells me there are concerns that the club is capable of surviving.
... considering the club was planning on asking the supporters to dip into their wallets and bail the club out by $250K this year, its all starting to point to the same thing, that somehow, we've managed to go belly up in one year?
Help from anyone would be appreciated here?
by Spargo » Tue May 15, 2012 8:52 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Tue May 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |