2012 Reports & Tribunal Discussion

[whufc]

No suprise Matty Westoffs report didnt make it to the tribunal..........................they probably saw his name and striking and thought his never been close enough to an opposition player to strike them.

Sorry Bad Joke Time!!!!!

[Jim05]

Chris Knights reported for striking.
Who did he belt?

[story of my life]

Chris Knights reported for striking.
Who did he belt?

the person closest to him.... some little old lady sitting in the stands

[RustyCage]

Chris Knights (Eagles) has been found guilty of Striking and received a 1 match ban

Conduct – Intentional – “the incident occurred 40metres from the ball and the report was the second contact with the first being to the stomach”
Contact - High
Impact – Low – “the medical report was obtained from South and there was no injury from the incident”

Level 3 Striking – 225 Points

25% Deduction for Guilty Plea

1 Match with 68.75 carried over

[Dutchy]

Ryan Ferguson & James Allan both offered a 1 match early guilty plea.

[sjt]

Did Grima get reported in the two's? If so any outcome?

[Big Phil]

Did Grima get reported in the two's? If so any outcome?

Yes, he did, for striking Central's Corey Reichert...

I'd suspect the Match Review Panel would sit today and he may face the tribunal tonight?

Usually tribunal news and outcomes are advised on a Tuesday so stay tuned tomorrow...

[RustyCage]

I wonder what the biggest margin an intelligible player has "won" a Magarey/Brownlow/Liston/Sandover..... medal by.

[Big Phil]

I wonder what the biggest margin an intelligible player has "won" a Magarey/Brownlow/Liston/Sandover..... medal by.

How votes ahead was Sticks when he was playing for the Bays and missed out?

[Dirko]

Kernas was 9 votes ahead of Antrobus.

Averaged 2 votes per game over the season...

Incredible getting 44 votes

[Grahaml]

So do North take this on? I don't think they have anything to lose but carryover points so it might just be worth it for them.

[Big Phil]

Kernas was 9 votes ahead of Antrobus.

Averaged 2 votes per game over the season...

Incredible getting 44 votes

Thanks Jabber, I thought it was pretty hight figures !!!

[Big Phil]

So do North take this on? I don't think they have anything to lose but carryover points so it might just be worth it for them.

From Localfootysa...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6355013444

[on the rails]

Ryan Ferguson & James Allan both offered a 1 match early guilty plea.

I have been privy to some info around the report which is interesting. Funny how the umpire who reported him saw the action by Allan but missed the previous 4 minutes of provocation from the first bounce by his tagger which apparently was a lot more "intense" than the normal tagging action he is subjected to? I can only assume the umpire was worried if he was watching the two of them so how did he miss the actions of his tagger that caused Allan to lash out? Perhaps if the umpire jumpred on that and paid a free for his "scragging" etc then Allan may not have had to do what he did?

[Booney]

Is that really relevant? Provocation is not a defence.

I watched Killa and Allan quite closely early on, funnily enough not when the incident happened, and I thought Killa was being very,very annoying but from what I witnessed nothing outside the rules. Not to say nothing illegal happend, however.

I was very worried about Allans potential influence and watched with interest who went to him and in what manner. Kulikowski was very good in the first half on him.

[Jim05]

How early/late in the season did Kernahan get reported?
Not sure if they do it on purpose or just subconciously but it seems to me the umps tend to not award votes or give reduced votes to players reported for remainder of season.
Ive often wondered if umps when doing the votes think that way and instead of giving someone 3 votes they give them 1 or 2 knowing they cant win it

[Jim05]

Ryan Ferguson & James Allan both offered a 1 match early guilty plea.

I have been privy to some info around the report which is interesting. Funny how the umpire who reported him saw the action by Allan but missed the previous 4 minutes of provocation from the first bounce by his tagger which apparently was a lot more "intense" than the normal tagging action he is subjected to? I can only assume the umpire was worried if he was watching the two of them so how did he miss the actions of his tagger that caused Allan to lash out? Perhaps if the umpire jumpred on that and paid a free for his "scragging" etc then Allan may not have had to do what he did?

The retaliator always gets caught

[robranisgod]

Is that really relevant? Provocation is not a defence.

I watched Killa and Allan quite closely early on, funnily enough not when the incident happened, and I thought Killa was being very,very annoying but from what I witnessed nothing outside the rules. Not to say nothing illegal happend, however.

I was very worried about Allans potential influence and watched with interest who went to him and in what manner. Kulikowski was very good in the first half on him.

Provocation used to be a defence. Both Ken Eustice and Malcolm Hall in the 1960s were found not guilty under extreme provocation.

[The Sleeping Giant]

I say take the one match ban. Be interesting to see how Jimmy is judged by the umpires the rest of the year.

Wouldn't be surprised to see North challenge the suspension though. The umpires didn't get much right on Saturday. Goals were points. Points were goals. Not too many free kicks were the correct decision either.

[robranisgod]

How early/late in the season did Kernahan get reported?
Not sure if they do it on purpose or just subconciously but it seems to me the umps tend to not award votes or give reduced votes to players reported for remainder of season.
Ive often wondered if umps when doing the votes think that way and instead of giving someone 3 votes they give them 1 or 2 knowing they cant win it

Kernahan was reported on the Anzac Day weekend, so it was about round 4.