by Squawk » Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:07 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:53 am
by Brodlach » Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:05 am
SJABC wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:20 am
Brodlach wrote:JK wrote:Brodlach wrote:Good career, good player and not a bad bloke, just not a good at supporting the club that supported him when he was young.
Glad he got the premiership he was chasing
Yes, would have gotten that with his original club Im sure ;)
Good decision Eag's, who has always been mindful of the younger lads trying to work their way up also .. Thanks for giving it a crack.
Guess we will never know, thanks for the transfer fee though
by Brodlach » Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:37 am
Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:JK wrote:Brodlach wrote:Good career, good player and not a bad bloke, just not a good at supporting the club that supported him when he was young.
Glad he got the premiership he was chasing
Yes, would have gotten that with his original club Im sure ;)
Good decision Eag's, who has always been mindful of the younger lads trying to work their way up also .. Thanks for giving it a crack.
Guess we will never know, thanks for the transfer fee though
![]()
Go on, do tell....I'm all ears.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by smac » Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:40 am
by Psyber » Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:02 am
by Bunton » Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:04 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:31 am
Psyber wrote:A diplomatic retirement statement drafted after discussions and negotiations within the club I would assume...
It was all a bit sudden to suggest the statement is entirely true.
by Grahaml » Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:50 pm
Squawk wrote:Didn't the ABC simply say he had played his last game for Norwood? The Nwd officials said something different - that he was injured and unable to play vs the Eagles, which was in response to rumours put to them. Two different things, but it seems to me that both the ABC and the Nwd Officials were correct in each of their respective contexts.
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:49 pm
Grahaml wrote:Squawk wrote:Didn't the ABC simply say he had played his last game for Norwood? The Nwd officials said something different - that he was injured and unable to play vs the Eagles, which was in response to rumours put to them. Two different things, but it seems to me that both the ABC and the Nwd Officials were correct in each of their respective contexts.
Amazing coincidence that the story comes out, is refuted by Norwood and within a few days Eagleton retires. If the story was simply untrue as Norwood tried to make us believe then Eagleton would be playing out the season.
by whufc » Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:54 pm
by whufc » Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:15 pm
by am Bays » Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:35 pm
whufc wrote:Has there ever been such a contrast where a club has things running so well on field yet off field the club is a bloody shamble!
by mickey » Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:52 pm
by whufc » Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:57 pm
mickey wrote:Does his massive contract still count towards this seasons salary cap? Or is it just for match payments actually made?
by fish » Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:19 pm
by Aerie » Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:27 pm
by Scrapboy » Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:48 pm
by mal » Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:54 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Hhmmm. Looks like an ABC commentator has jumped the gun.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |