
by Wedgie » Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:39 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by PhilH » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:06 pm
by RustyCage » Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Slots It Through wrote:MatteeG wrote:BUZZ wrote:These 3 players I believe have been told they will not be invited to training next year.
Why would you tell them this now and not in 6 weeks time?
You now have 6 weeks to play some quality U18s in the reserves who may push to play league football next year.
These decisions do not happen overnight, they are big decisions. Your footy club is measured on the league side, so everything you do below should be to improve that league side, and i am sure the people involved have this in mind.
by MatteeG » Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:03 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Slots It Through wrote:MatteeG wrote:BUZZ wrote:These 3 players I believe have been told they will not be invited to training next year.
Why would you tell them this now and not in 6 weeks time?
You now have 6 weeks to play some quality U18s in the reserves who may push to play league football next year.
These decisions do not happen overnight, they are big decisions. Your footy club is measured on the league side, so everything you do below should be to improve that league side, and i am sure the people involved have this in mind.
And wouldnt having the best coaches in lower grades help the development for the league team? Is there any reason Meady couldn't coach the reserves with the different players in the team? Didn't notice Kieren Hall there yesterday, so if he was one of the players sacked I hope he goes to another club where he will play regular league footy. Tim Milera is another one. Ditto Xavier Watson.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Bluedemon » Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:06 pm
by Hodges 153! » Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:07 pm
by NO-MERCY » Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:08 pm
Wedgie wrote:I don't have a problem with the philosophy with what has explained to be the cause, I can understand the club's philosophy and I can understand Mead being attached to some of those players and feeling cheated on. BUT, what I do question is the timing. The timing of it makes me think that there has to be something else behind it too.
by Slots It Through » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:31 pm
Hodges 153! wrote:Terry.
When was the last time an AFL listed player got axed from his SANFL reserves side?
(If this is what has happened to Tim...)
by Hodges 153! » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:51 pm
by Slots It Through » Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:22 pm
Hodges 153! wrote:Thanks for the clarification SIT...
Are you able to confirm which players have been told they are no longer required?
by piccachu » Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:25 pm
by CK » Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:15 pm
by Hodges 153! » Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:23 pm
Slots It Through wrote:Hodges 153! wrote:Thanks for the clarification SIT...
Are you able to confirm which players have been told they are no longer required?
To my knowledge no players have been told they are no longer required.
by Grahaml » Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:30 pm
Hodges 153! wrote:Slots It Through wrote:Hodges 153! wrote:Thanks for the clarification SIT...
Are you able to confirm which players have been told they are no longer required?
To my knowledge no players have been told they are no longer required.
Ok, can you tell us what has gone on then?
Have players been told they won't get a game next year, so they have walked out now?
How come Tim M didn't play if unrelated to this whole issue?
by tigerpie » Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:52 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:01 pm
tigerpie wrote:And the Port Adelaide train wreck continues to slide down the line, tearing up anything in its path.
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:17 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:20 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:21 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:LMAO. OMG laughing hard.
Can I use that as my avatar? Buckethead is never gonna complete that dunk.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |