Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby doggies4eva » Sat May 28, 2011 10:48 pm

I can't remember the last time an opposition forward Kicked so many goals against us.

Well done North and bad luck.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby rod_rooster » Sat May 28, 2011 10:49 pm

bulldog2004 wrote:Ful Best players for the Dogs Eddie Gunston (5 goals) and Pumpa sutherland.


Sansbury was outstanding. North could and maybe would've won if not for him. BOG comfortably for mine.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm

You've just dropped below mickeyj and dog_ger on my poster ranking list. They make more sense.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby sjt » Sat May 28, 2011 11:01 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:No comments on how playing in the Foxtel cup has hurt sides. Maybe because you will have to admit you were wrong. ;)

You would have won, if you hadn't played last week. ;)
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 28, 2011 11:19 pm

'cause teams go so well after a bye.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby sjt » Sat May 28, 2011 11:22 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:That's great. North nearly beat the top side, yet I think 1 Centrals supporter has given North any credit.


What do you expect TSG? Everyone knows the only reason why Central don't win every game by a million points is because the umpires are cheats and because the Dogs take things easy.


I haven't seen anyone yet, blame the umpires for our win. Most have said north played well.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby bulldog2004 » Sat May 28, 2011 11:57 pm

sjt wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:That's great. North nearly beat the top side, yet I think 1 Centrals supporter has given North any credit.


What do you expect TSG? Everyone knows the only reason why Central don't win every game by a million points is because the umpires are cheats and because the Dogs take things easy.


I haven't seen anyone yet, blame the umpires for our win. Most have said north played well.

Why would we they were shit house all round today
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Apachebulldog » Sun May 29, 2011 12:27 am

Great game of footy well done North killer Alleway kept the Cocks in the game good to see the umps only pay one holding the ball all day its gonna be a tough ask next week to beat the legs at Coopers !!!
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby on the rails » Sun May 29, 2011 2:45 am

whufc wrote:North played the worse half of SANFL football i have seen in the 25 years i have watched SANFL football


I have seen North serve up loads of disgraceful crap football in quarters, halves and full matches in my time following them but for you to make that comment even allowing for the fact that you have some issues when you drink too much and post crap but that comment takes the cake!

Did you sleep through the Havelberg goal fest when you beat Norwood by 160 points a few years back? Norwood served up a better half that day than North today?

Your comment doesn't exactly do justice to your own team then given how dominant for 11 years they have been but they couldn't thrash a record score against a team who played the worst half of SANFL football for 25 years.

BTW - I can remember a game in 1975 where your team conceded 49 goals - I wonder how you would have assessed that?

Time to think about posting sober or learning how to be a gracious winner?
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby StrayDog » Sun May 29, 2011 4:24 am

rod_rooster wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:That's great. North nearly beat the top side, yet I think 1 Centrals supporter has given North any credit.


What do you expect TSG? Everyone knows the only reason why Central don't win every game by a million points is because the umpires are cheats and because the Dogs take things easy.

Well FWIW, there were a few Centrals supporters on this thread (eg, Bruce, sjt, cennals, Hazy) that had given North "credit" at that stage. That aspect, in itself, certainly compared favourably with the offerings from your own camp.

Fair's fair fellas. ;)



Anyway, enough of that tosh.



There were fair periods out there when the bottom side simply worked harder than their more fancied opponents. Centrals' winning edge (or perhaps North's lack of one) getting the 'dogs over the line.

Centrals will certainly have something to think about during the week - Norwood will not be as forgiving, especially on their home turf.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Carpark.
Has liked: 1329 times
Been liked: 205 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun May 29, 2011 8:53 am

Brucetiki wrote:Didn't take long for the sour grapes to kick in from the North Adelaide trolls :roll:


It took a lot less time for a Dogs fan to come on and have a cry and your lot won.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun May 29, 2011 9:45 am

on the rails wrote:BTW - I can remember a game in 1975 where your team conceded 49 goals - I wonder how you would have assessed that?

Time to think about posting sober or learning how to be a gracious winner?


Football didn't start until 2000, every Bulldog fan knows that :)
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby bulldog2004 » Sun May 29, 2011 10:14 am

doggies4eva wrote:I can't remember the last time an opposition forward Kicked so many goals against us.

Well done North and bad luck.

Im sure Chambers might have got a few cheap ones.
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby bulldog2004 » Sun May 29, 2011 10:17 am

Rik E Boy wrote:
Brucetiki wrote:Didn't take long for the sour grapes to kick in from the North Adelaide trolls :roll:


It took a lot less time for a Dogs fan to come on and have a cry and your lot won.

regards,

REB

Thats right REB it was a bad win.
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Brucetiki » Sun May 29, 2011 10:34 am

Trust a Norwood supporter to take something completely out of context.

Do you work for Today Tonight REB :lol:
They don't keep me here because I'm gorgeous and 5'10
Brucetiki
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4629
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:23 pm
Has liked: 258 times
Been liked: 40 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Trent Plucktrum » Sun May 29, 2011 10:37 am

whufc wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Well what about Allans other 25 possies. Good to see you are sticking to your guns and laying off the grog.


All i will say is on todays performace he was average per possesion!

He can play though and without him North are 5 goals worse off.

Honestly i cant believe we nearly loss to that rubble!

Some of Laird, Chaplin and Platten's faces when North were coming back were priceless.

If we play like that against Norwood next week will we loose by 69 points.

I have seen the 2011 SANFL wooden spooner!

Thank F**k for the Corporate Box

Tosser !! spend some time posting sober you little dweeb !!
My Team


The Cocks
User avatar
Trent Plucktrum
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:05 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby whufc » Sun May 29, 2011 10:59 am

Trent Plucktrum wrote:
whufc wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Well what about Allans other 25 possies. Good to see you are sticking to your guns and laying off the grog.


All i will say is on todays performace he was average per possesion!

He can play though and without him North are 5 goals worse off.

Honestly i cant believe we nearly loss to that rubble!

Some of Laird, Chaplin and Platten's faces when North were coming back were priceless.

If we play like that against Norwood next week will we loose by 69 points.

I have seen the 2011 SANFL wooden spooner!

Thank F**k for the Corporate Box

Tosser !! spend some time posting sober you little dweeb !!


Geez its getting easy to stir up the same few each week.

For all my crap posts you will never see me abusing other posters or taking their personal life etc etc into account.

Thats cool though keep up the insighful thoughts of what you saw at the football.

North first quarter was a debacle, Central should have been 10 goals up but we were nearly as bad.

As i said we play like that next week Norwood will beat us by 10 goals.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28772
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Big Phil » Sun May 29, 2011 11:03 am

Tom Dunne reported for Central - those that saw it, what do you think, will he get a game(s)?
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby CedeNullis » Sun May 29, 2011 11:07 am

on the rails wrote:
whufc wrote:North played the worse half of SANFL football i have seen in the 25 years i have watched SANFL football


I have seen North serve up loads of disgraceful crap football in quarters, halves and full matches in my time following them but for you to make that comment even allowing for the fact that you have some issues when you drink too much and post crap but that comment takes the cake!

Did you sleep through the Havelberg goal fest when you beat Norwood by 160 points a few years back? Norwood served up a better half that day than North today?

Your comment doesn't exactly do justice to your own team then given how dominant for 11 years they have been but they couldn't thrash a record score against a team who played the worst half of SANFL football for 25 years.

BTW - I can remember a game in 1975 where your team conceded 49 goals - I wonder how you would have assessed that?

Time to think about posting sober or learning how to be a gracious winner?


Saved me from posting something similar, on the rails.
whufc, you are going to reap what you have sown.
Just because you can type, doesn't mean you know anything about football.
User avatar
CedeNullis
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: From the Kennel
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Rnd 9 - Central v North @ Elizabeth REVIEWS & DISCUSSIONS

Postby Trent Plucktrum » Sun May 29, 2011 11:11 am

CedeNullis wrote:
on the rails wrote:
whufc wrote:North played the worse half of SANFL football i have seen in the 25 years i have watched SANFL football


I have seen North serve up loads of disgraceful crap football in quarters, halves and full matches in my time following them but for you to make that comment even allowing for the fact that you have some issues when you drink too much and post crap but that comment takes the cake!

Did you sleep through the Havelberg goal fest when you beat Norwood by 160 points a few years back? Norwood served up a better half that day than North today?

Your comment doesn't exactly do justice to your own team then given how dominant for 11 years they have been but they couldn't thrash a record score against a team who played the worst half of SANFL football for 25 years.

BTW - I can remember a game in 1975 where your team conceded 49 goals - I wonder how you would have assessed that?

Time to think about posting sober or learning how to be a gracious winner?


Saved me from posting something similar, on the rails.
whufc, you are going to reap what you have sown.
Just because you can type, doesn't mean you know anything about football.

Thanks you said it nicer than i would , whufc you basically just post crap week in week out and expect people not to pick you up on it .
My Team


The Cocks
User avatar
Trent Plucktrum
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:05 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 20 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |