Sick of Rucci

[CUTTERMAN]

Rucci's job is to sell papers, not to make intelligent balanced articles. And sadly it works. How many people talk about what he's written, and how many people buy the paper just to read what nonsense he's on about today?

Like politicians, journalists are a creation of what appeals to the masses.

The sports section isnt the mainstay of the Advertiser

If they ever did away with the crosswords no one would bother buying a paper

And The Phantom

[HeartBeatsTrue]

Rucci's job is to sell papers, not to make intelligent balanced articles. And sadly it works. How many people talk about what he's written, and how many people buy the paper just to read what nonsense he's on about today?

Like politicians, journalists are a creation of what appeals to the masses.

The sports section isnt the mainstay of the Advertiser

If they ever did away with the crosswords no one would bother buying a paper

And The Phantom

Dont forget Fred Bassett.

[mickey]

You guys cant be serious... fred bassett?? The Phantom?????

Every one knows calvin & hobbs is the most important part

[Lakesider]

Rucci is a crud journo but he is no worse than Capel and Milbank who suffer from the same downfalls as the Rucc, why do these two numpties escape from criticism?

[HOORAY PUNT]

Heard Rucci on radio last night say that when Terry Jennner was in Gaol he would often write to him about his articles on cricket and basically how poor they were it sounded like Jenner wouldn't hold back either. Nothing has changed.

[hottie]

Laughed yesterday on 5aa Rucci was telling David Wildy to stop misquoting him on something that Wildy claimed Rucci said earlier.I thought journos are the worst when writing articles that misquote what a person has told them.

[sjt]

I posted the following in response to Ruccis latest bias on Adelaide Now. I wonder if he'll let this go through on the comments, as opposed to some previous contrary views to his I've posted that haven't made it through.


"You forgot
Haysman: Hi Rucci, how's things? Good job demonising footy park, blaming everyone but us and lobbying for Adelaide Oval to be the panacea to our problems.

Rucci: Thanks Haysy, I've done my best. I'd rather not talk about "our" errors.

Haysman: Well done by the way mentioning Caroline Wilson's comments re the SANFL. Make sure you dont mention her saying, ""clearly the AFL are trying to send the SANFL broke. Or they're hoping they go broke", like she did on 5AA the other night.

Rucci: Whatever you say Haysy, I'll keep being selective. Anything else I can do for you? Hopefully my lobbying will destroy the SANFL sooner rather than later. As long as we stick together.

Haysman: Maybe mention the reserves angle for the tenth time. Just don't mention the cost, the lack of players, Neil Craig's view on it or the negative impact on the SANFL comp.

Rucci: No problems buisness as usual.

P. S I wonder if you'll post this as opposed to censoring like some other previous comments.
LEAVE OUR SANFL ALONE!!!"

[sjt]

I also posted:

"Michelangelo, is it true Western Bulldogs are 3 million in debt? What was North Melbourne, Melbourne and Richmond's debt at the start of the year - given their superior stadium deals, club structure and business models?"

[Barto]

Best writer of fiction since David Irving.

[White Line Fever]

Rucci gave Judd 4th best in paper today..

Did he watch the game?

[HOORAY PUNT]

I posted the following in response to Ruccis latest bias on Adelaide Now. I wonder if he'll let this go through on the comments, as opposed to some previous contrary views to his I've posted that haven't made it through.


"You forgot
Haysman: Hi Rucci, how's things? Good job demonising footy park, blaming everyone but us and lobbying for Adelaide Oval to be the panacea to our problems.

Rucci: Thanks Haysy, I've done my best. I'd rather not talk about "our" errors.

Haysman: Well done by the way mentioning Caroline Wilson's comments re the SANFL. Make sure you dont mention her saying, ""clearly the AFL are trying to send the SANFL broke. Or they're hoping they go broke", like she did on 5AA the other night.

Rucci: Whatever you say Haysy, I'll keep being selective. Anything else I can do for you? Hopefully my lobbying will destroy the SANFL sooner rather than later. As long as we stick together.

Haysman: Maybe mention the reserves angle for the tenth time. Just don't mention the cost, the lack of players, Neil Craig's view on it or the negative impact on the SANFL comp.

Rucci: No problems buisness as usual.

P. S I wonder if you'll post this as opposed to censoring like some other previous comments.
LEAVE OUR SANFL ALONE!!!"

Who mentioned Leaflets ? This is fantastic as a handout .Well done.

[Adelaide Hawk]

Rucci gave Judd 4th best in paper today..

Did he watch the game?

Too high, or too low?

[Barto]

Rucci gave Judd 4th best in paper today..

Did he watch the game?

He would've watched the game, it's just that he doesn't know what the **** he's talking about.

[HOORAY PUNT]

Rucci gave Judd 4th best in paper today..

Did he watch the game?

Too high, or too low?

Rucci ,too low . He should be on the side of the road selling them not writing in them. I use the term writing loosely.

[White Line Fever]

too high judd was terrible

[Adelaide Hawk]

too high judd was terrible

He quite often is, it's just rare for people to notice.

[White Line Fever]

too high judd was terrible

He quite often is, it's just rare for people to notice.

I find he is quite often brilliant, one of the best contested ball players in my era...

but when he does have an 'off' game some people without much savvy still put him in best.

[Alby_Green]

I posted the following in response to Ruccis latest bias on Adelaide Now. I wonder if he'll let this go through on the comments, as opposed to some previous contrary views to his I've posted that haven't made it through.


"You forgot
Haysman: Hi Rucci, how's things? Good job demonising footy park, blaming everyone but us and lobbying for Adelaide Oval to be the panacea to our problems.

Rucci: Thanks Haysy, I've done my best. I'd rather not talk about "our" errors.

Haysman: Well done by the way mentioning Caroline Wilson's comments re the SANFL. Make sure you dont mention her saying, ""clearly the AFL are trying to send the SANFL broke. Or they're hoping they go broke", like she did on 5AA the other night.

Rucci: Whatever you say Haysy, I'll keep being selective. Anything else I can do for you? Hopefully my lobbying will destroy the SANFL sooner rather than later. As long as we stick together.

Haysman: Maybe mention the reserves angle for the tenth time. Just don't mention the cost, the lack of players, Neil Craig's view on it or the negative impact on the SANFL comp.

Rucci: No problems buisness as usual.

P. S I wonder if you'll post this as opposed to censoring like some other previous comments.
LEAVE OUR SANFL ALONE!!!"

Looks like it was screened out & will not make its way on to the comments section.

The balance of the readers' comments in these articles is skewed to the point of disbelief .

[sjt]

I posted the following in response to Ruccis latest bias on Adelaide Now. I wonder if he'll let this go through on the comments, as opposed to some previous contrary views to his I've posted that haven't made it through.


"You forgot
Haysman: Hi Rucci, how's things? Good job demonising footy park, blaming everyone but us and lobbying for Adelaide Oval to be the panacea to our problems.

Rucci: Thanks Haysy, I've done my best. I'd rather not talk about "our" errors.

Haysman: Well done by the way mentioning Caroline Wilson's comments re the SANFL. Make sure you dont mention her saying, ""clearly the AFL are trying to send the SANFL broke. Or they're hoping they go broke", like she did on 5AA the other night.

Rucci: Whatever you say Haysy, I'll keep being selective. Anything else I can do for you? Hopefully my lobbying will destroy the SANFL sooner rather than later. As long as we stick together.

Haysman: Maybe mention the reserves angle for the tenth time. Just don't mention the cost, the lack of players, Neil Craig's view on it or the negative impact on the SANFL comp.

Rucci: No problems buisness as usual.

P. S I wonder if you'll post this as opposed to censoring like some other previous comments.
LEAVE OUR SANFL ALONE!!!"

Looks like it was screened out & will not make its way on to the comments section.

The balance of the readers' comments in these articles is skewed to the point of disbelief

Correct, I posted it twice a couple of hours apart. Though one of my "less important" posts got through. Yes, "funny" how this was screened out, yet other abusive and obviously factually incorrect posts get through.

[sjt]

I hads another crack with this:

"How about,

Rucci: Haysey, given our cash flow problem, have we received all our sponsorship money for this year?

Haysman; Ummm

Rucci; If not, why not?

Haysman: How's those Crows eh?"

I wonder if the above is worthy of being censored.