by redandblack » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:09 pm
by bloods08 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:12 pm
by Blacky » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:13 pm
bayman wrote:that's all very true boys but it has been proven that overall it doesn't work as the players can't sustain the effort for the majority of a game & yes all teams have done it & i'm embarrassed that glenelg (under brenton honor) was the first to do it in the sanfl which was against wwt at the adelaide oval
by stampy » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:02 pm
by oldfella » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:20 pm
bayman wrote:Brodlach wrote:bayman wrote:a typical trial game, both sides were tenacious & committed & i can't believe that west decided to flood for much of the game, i thought bode was our best & caruso was best for west
does anyone know how bad alex scott (wa) shoulder & craig pitt (glg) ankle are ?
The clash of heads in the last quarter was infront of me, any idea how (and who) the Bay player is?
that was tom logan, i don't know how he is either![]()
by whufc » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:02 pm
by Thiele » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:03 pm
whufc wrote:How did Travis Ronaldson go today.
by redandblack » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:03 pm
by whufc » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:05 pm
Thiele wrote:whufc wrote:How did Travis Ronaldson go today.
Didnt play injured at the moment
by bayman » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:30 am
redandblack wrote:bayman, this is the only time in history that I've agreed with TSG and it will probably be the last, but he's right.
This is how football is played now. Players work hard up and down the ground. It was a trial game and your boys played 27 players and West played 23.
Both sides would have been happy with the outing.
From a West point of view, it was a pleasing display, with a host of players to still come in. Just as pleasing was the display of so many Under 18's in the first game.
by redandblack » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:47 am
by whufc » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:01 am
by whufc » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:05 am
by Brodlach » Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:21 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by bayman » Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:40 pm
Brodlach wrote:First of all, this is not a loaded question.
I was at the game yesterday and I know he was named to play, but did Kane Tenace play? I dont remember him at all on the ground. Also were there many senior Glenelg players missing?
by has been » Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:49 pm
by redandblack » Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:19 am
has been wrote:I was at the game yesterday to watch the young bloods mainly in the ressies and if the league teams both bays and west play that brand - I know its a trial - sturt and centrals will smash em. west clearly have improved but they are only half way there and will struggle to make the 5. Glenelg where obviously experimenting. Got to hand it to Collins he has them enthusiastic. That only gets him so far - talent will be his down fall in the end. just picking 6' 2" players that run in lines only gets you so far. As the AFL sides are finding out. Players need a brain and some of his are dumb sometimes.
by am Bays » Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:08 am
Brodlach wrote:First of all, this is not a loaded question.
I was at the game yesterday and I know he was named to play, but did Kane Tenace play? I dont remember him at all on the ground. Also were there many senior Glenelg players missing?
by dedja » Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:22 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |