by CENTURION » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:17 pm
by the joker » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:57 pm
by hawkseye » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:59 pm
the joker wrote:every Grand final they make is one closer to one they dont make. so i am predicting Centrals to miss there first Grand Final since 99. will be hard to replace Slade and Chad O'sullivan to be in rehab for 10 months is a huge loss (i hope its not like Nathan Brown, he never got back to his best) and if the Gowans retire. thats will be a few big losses
GF North vs West
by the joker » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:09 pm
demonseye wrote:the joker wrote:every Grand final they make is one closer to one they dont make. so i am predicting Centrals to miss there first Grand Final since 99. will be hard to replace Slade and Chad O'sullivan to be in rehab for 10 months is a huge loss (i hope its not like Nathan Brown, he never got back to his best) and if the Gowans retire. thats will be a few big losses
GF North vs West
Gowans arent retiring
by bayman » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:12 pm
demonseye wrote:the joker wrote:every Grand final they make is one closer to one they dont make. so i am predicting Centrals to miss there first Grand Final since 99. will be hard to replace Slade and Chad O'sullivan to be in rehab for 10 months is a huge loss (i hope its not like Nathan Brown, he never got back to his best) and if the Gowans retire. thats will be a few big losses
GF North vs West
Gowans arent retiring
by smac » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:13 pm
by EasyE » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:18 pm
the joker wrote:they might when they both have two hundred games. play a couple next year and then retire. they are 32
by hawkseye » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:22 pm
bayman wrote:demonseye wrote:the joker wrote:every Grand final they make is one closer to one they dont make. so i am predicting Centrals to miss there first Grand Final since 99. will be hard to replace Slade and Chad O'sullivan to be in rehab for 10 months is a huge loss (i hope its not like Nathan Brown, he never got back to his best) and if the Gowans retire. thats will be a few big losses
GF North vs West
Gowans arent retiring
spot on demonseye, i heard 'one of them' on the radio yesterday & he said we will both keep going for as long as the bodies handle it as they both love playing the game (why would you stop when they are on the biggest roll of all time ?)....i can see them playing in both back pockets when they are 40
by the joker » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:23 pm
smac wrote:You know better than that...![]()
They wouldn't go on unless they intended to finish the season.
by eaglehaslanded » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:57 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Interesting stat here
2006 - North won the reserves premiership, played in the 2007 League GF.
2007 - Glenelg won the reserves premiership, played in the 2008 League GF.
2008 - Sturt won the reserves premiership, played in the 2009 League GF.
As Glenelg won the 2009 reserves flag, my prediction is Glenelg.
by hot dogs » Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:06 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:22 pm
hot dogs wrote:man o man. There are certainly some bitter and twisted (or is it twisted and bitter individuals out there. Not sure what the story is about the Norwood folks throwing stones into premiership glasshouses, but come on, surely you can do better than trotting out the old 'dole bludger' crap. Stooping to levels of this nature only serve to highlight your own teams inadequacies. Do we make comments about 'your mob' beating up Mr Rann with a rolled up copy of The Financial Review?
Woof x8
by JK » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:08 am
hot dogs wrote:surely you can do better than trotting out the old 'dole bludger' crap. Stooping to levels of this nature only serve to highlight your own teams inadequacies.
by sjt » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:44 am
Constance_Perm wrote:hot dogs wrote:surely you can do better than trotting out the old 'dole bludger' crap. Stooping to levels of this nature only serve to highlight your own teams inadequacies.
Actually, I think it highlights an individual's own inadequacies ... Our club has been crap, everyone knows it including our own supporters (surely noone could be that stupid not to acknowledge it) - The throwing of old and tired remarks with malicious intent says more about a person than the club they support ... IMHO.
by Psyber » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:31 pm
by Booney » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:32 pm
by Old but Smart Dog » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:15 pm
by Dirko » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:18 pm
Booney wrote:Let's hope it's the Bays.
Love to see them lose the big one after this year. Perhaps let them come from 5th and lose the Granny.....
by LBJ8 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:00 pm
by Booney » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:15 am
SJABC wrote:Booney wrote:Let's hope it's the Bays.
Love to see them lose the big one after this year. Perhaps let them come from 5th and lose the Granny.....
You Port blokes have gone soft !
In days gone bye you would've killed yourself by admitting you'd rather Glenelg in a GF then Port![]()
And even if we do lose it, at least those black n white scum bags aren't there
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |