by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:55 pm
by hawks21 » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:09 pm
by doggies4eva » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:12 pm
hawks21 wrote:I think you might see a few changes for sturt this week. Chambers, Kurtze, Vassal and Sharples will all come into consideration. Thurstans would have to be in some doubt also.
by hawkseye » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:21 pm
duncs wrote:the joker wrote:shouldnt it be Centrals vs Sturt as they are the Higher ranked side. and got in the GF through the Second Semi not the Preliminary.
And it should read Central Vs Sturt....... not Centrals.. geez that really grinds my gears!
by sjt » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:25 pm
doggies4eva wrote:hawks21 wrote:I think you might see a few changes for sturt this week. Chambers, Kurtze, Vassal and Sharples will all come into consideration. Thurstans would have to be in some doubt also.
SOME doubt? can't see him playing. He can probably hardly walk today.
by Blue Boy » Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:00 pm
by Dog-boy » Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:39 pm
by FlyingHigh » Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:52 pm
by Booney » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:08 pm
by FlyingHigh » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:12 pm
Booney wrote:So, if Sturt win the crowd will be bigger?
by topsywaldron » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:13 pm
Booney wrote:So, if Sturt win the crowd will be bigger?
by csbowes » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:26 pm
by Barto » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:33 pm
csbowes wrote:No one should be even contemplating Chambers will be available.... Thurstons would also be very doubtful.
by Whitelinefever » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:37 pm
by bayman » Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:19 pm
by SnappyTom » Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:35 pm
bayman wrote:the mail i got yesterday about brant chambers was wrong as i apparently misheard what i was told, he will not be playing on sunday unfortuneately for sturt & the general football public
by FlyingHigh » Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:49 pm
Whitelinefever wrote:I reckon the Sturt players will know what the situation with Chambers is asap.
Will he or wont he......not the thoughts that will be in their minds,just an added distraction,they will know so they can be totally focussed on the job at hand.
Would it be possible for him to play even if not fully fit?Will they take that chance?
by hawkseye » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:59 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Whitelinefever wrote:I reckon the Sturt players will know what the situation with Chambers is asap.
Will he or wont he......not the thoughts that will be in their minds,just an added distraction,they will know so they can be totally focussed on the job at hand.
Would it be possible for him to play even if not fully fit?Will they take that chance?
Would have to be very tempting. Often seems to backfire if it is a midfielder, but perhaps a forward could get away with it? Could mean the focus taken off Herring. Or perhaps play him as the second forward, and if they get just 3 goals from him it could make a huge difference.
by phantom57 » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:19 pm
by udogs01 » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |