Constance_Perm wrote:The regard he is or isn't held in is irrelevant .. If he feels he held a contract for $x and abided by the terms and conditions of said contract without receiving the due amount, then he's quite entitled to chase that money.
Just as entitled are North, if they feel that he either received the committed amount or broke conditions of contract, to vigorously defend themselves.
Move on, nothing for us supporters to see here ..
bugger me, thirsty all of a sudden......