Norwood's Performance

[UK Fan]

Good to see everyone on the same page down at the legs. I have no doubt this letter "may or may not" have a positive affect on the playing group.

Any chance we could get a copy of the letter sent from the playing group to the board after the club was busted over the salary cap and they were forced to take pay cuts.

Positive for Norwood fans atleast the board members actually informed the players first this time(Joel Coombes).


So who would of been norwoods most succesful coach this decade. Macca ???? Legs finished 3rd in 2002.

Man I wish this forum was around from 1964-1999.
This decade sux.
If we wanna talk succesful coaches by decade. Should we talk about the 70's, 80's and 90's?

Why so you could go back and re-read the things you said back then to make yourself feel better.???? How sad.

[HeartBeatsTrue]

Back on topic, this is the action all us supporters have been crying out for, and needed to take place after the game against North.

Should have happened well before then, there have been instances in 2007, 08 and 09 when action was necessary ... I guess we should be thankful they opted for this release, than another contract extension lol

Agreed. Was referring to this year, but yes action was needed years ago.
Whether this action will amount to anything time will tell.

[HeartBeatsTrue]

Good to see everyone on the same page down at the legs. I have no doubt this letter "may or may not" have a positive affect on the playing group.

Any chance we could get a copy of the letter sent from the playing group to the board after the club was busted over the salary cap and they were forced to take pay cuts.

Positive for Norwood fans atleast the board members actually informed the players first this time(Joel Coombes).


So who would of been norwoods most succesful coach this decade. Macca ???? Legs finished 3rd in 2002.

Man I wish this forum was around from 1964-1999.
This decade sux.
If we wanna talk succesful coaches by decade. Should we talk about the 70's, 80's and 90's?

Why so you could go back and re-read the things you said back then to make yourself feel better.???? How sad.

No, coz I wouldnt have to waste my time reading your tripe. Damn i've wasted more precious seconds responding.

[Wedgie]

Did you mean 1864-1899?
Reason I ask is it was a widely held thought that Norwood were the biggest underachievers in the league for the quarter of a century after World War 2 but they did have a golden era in the late 1800s.

[Adelaide Hawk]

Norwood were the biggest underachievers in the league for the quarter of a century

A bit like the 18 year period North Adelaide 1992-2009? Nah .. Norwood played in 5 grand finals in our 25 years of underachievement

[HeartBeatsTrue]

Cant talk about the pre 1900 era as i wasnt alive then. Would have been nice though.
Wedgie, its unlike you though to post about something thats off topic.

[Wedgie]

Norwood were the biggest underachievers in the league for the quarter of a century

A bit like the 18 year period North Adelaide 1992-2009? Nah .. Norwood played in 5 grand finals in our 25 years of underachievement

Not really, North have achieved about where most have expected to, they did underachieve in 86 and 89 though. Only going on what Norwood supporters told me about that era, 1952 would be a glaring wg

[Wedgie]

Cant talk about the pre 1900 era as i wasnt alive then. Would have been nice though.
Wedgie, its unlike you though to post about something thats off topic.

How is it off topic? A Norwood supporter brought it up which I questioned and its about Norwood's performance.

I assume you are referring to AH who brouht up North which was off topic?

[HeartBeatsTrue]

Cant talk about the pre 1900 era as i wasnt alive then. Would have been nice though.
Wedgie, its unlike you though to post about something thats off topic.

How is it off topic? A Norwood supporter brought it up which I questioned and its about Norwood's performance.

I assume you are referring to AH who brouht up North which was off topic?

You're a smartarse

Read the first post and its about a letter to Norwood members about our performance now, as in right now, not years ago.
Yes I did bring up "1964-1999" which is definately off topic, but you continued the off topic conversation and you are normally the "Keep things on topic" Nazi.

We digress.

Carn the legs this Saturday and beyond.

[Wedgie]

Cant talk about the pre 1900 era as i wasnt alive then. Would have been nice though.
Wedgie, its unlike you though to post about something thats off topic.

How is it off topic? A Norwood supporter brought it up which I questioned and its about Norwood's performance.

I assume you are referring to AH who brouht up North which was off topic?

You're a smartarse

Read the first post and its about a letter to Norwood members about our performance now, as in right now, not years ago.
Yes I did bring up "1964-1999" which is definately off topic, but you continued the off topic conversation and you are normally the "Keep things on topic" Nazi.

We digress.

Carn the legs this Saturday and beyond.

No need for name calling (smart arse and Nazi) when all I did was respond to a post you made talking about Norwood's performance in a topic entitled Norwood's performance.

Please keep this topic in relation to the Norwood Football Club, if you can't work out something then PM me.

[HeartBeatsTrue]

Cant talk about the pre 1900 era as i wasnt alive then. Would have been nice though.
Wedgie, its unlike you though to post about something thats off topic.

How is it off topic? A Norwood supporter brought it up which I questioned and its about Norwood's performance.

I assume you are referring to AH who brouht up North which was off topic?

You're a smartarse

Read the first post and its about a letter to Norwood members about our performance now, as in right now, not years ago.
Yes I did bring up "1964-1999" which is definately off topic, but you continued the off topic conversation and you are normally the "Keep things on topic" Nazi.

We digress.

Carn the legs this Saturday and beyond.

No need for name calling (smart arse and Nazi) when all I did was respond to a post you made talking about Norwood's performance in a topic entitled Norwood's performance.

Did you just read my post? Or just pick 1 or 2 words? Talking about Norwood pre this current period of mediocrity is off topic, regardless of the topic title.
Nazi a harsh name maybe and I'll take that back but not SmartArse.

[UK Fan]

Good to see everyone on the same page down at the legs. I have no doubt this letter "may or may not" have a positive affect on the playing group.

Any chance we could get a copy of the letter sent from the playing group to the board after the club was busted over the salary cap and they were forced to take pay cuts.

Positive for Norwood fans atleast the board members actually informed the players first this time(Joel Coombes).


So who would of been norwoods most succesful coach this decade. Macca ???? Legs finished 3rd in 2002.

Man I wish this forum was around from 1964-1999.
This decade sux.
If we wanna talk succesful coaches by decade. Should we talk about the 70's, 80's and 90's?

Why so you could go back and re-read the things you said back then to make yourself feel better.???? How sad.

No, coz I wouldnt have to waste my time reading your tripe. Damn i've wasted more precious seconds responding.

Absolutely Woeful.

[Wedgie]

Talking about Norwood pre this current period of mediocrity is off topic, regardless of the topic title.
Nazi a harsh name maybe and I'll take that back but not SmartArse.

Mate, if the mods think its off topic we'll let you know, as you actually started the talk of something out of this current period but we deemed it acceptable so any replies relating to that or replying to that is fine so no need to be concerned about your post or any of those replying to it.
Thank you for taking you taking a name back, apology accepted.
Can people please keep posts on topic about the Norwood FC, any others not relating mainly to Norwood will be removed, any concerns or queries then just pm me.
Cheers.

PS Just to help things along, it'll be interesting to see how/if the Norwood players react this week. If they don't would it be the end of Hill?

[JK]

PS Just to help things along, it'll be interesting to see how/if the Norwood players react this week. If they don't would it be the end of Hill?

Nah mate, Im pretty certain he's safe for the year, but long gone in 2010

[Wedgie]

PS Just to help things along, it'll be interesting to see how/if the Norwood players react this week. If they don't would it be the end of Hill?

Nah mate, Im pretty certain he's safe for the year, but long gone in 2010

If they're definately getting rid of him at the end of the year why wouldn't they use the rest of the year to trial someone else?

[HeartBeatsTrue]

PS Just to help things along, it'll be interesting to see how/if the Norwood players react this week. If they don't would it be the end of Hill?

Nah mate, Im pretty certain he's safe for the year, but long gone in 2010

If they're definately getting rid of him at the end of the year why wouldn't they use the rest of the year to trial someone else?

We've all wondered the same thing. Nothing new.

[Dutchy]

So do Lower and Taylor Walker get a talking to by KT before this weeks game also?