Rd 13 Norwood v West Post Game Reviews

[matt1]

I noted some posts about recruiting for 2010 re Norwood - What was norwoods ban for recruiting next year for the Slaray Cap Breach - Correct me if I am wrong (and I often am), Norwood couldnt recruit outside their zone next year? I dont know if that extended to the mini-draft though

Norwood can still recruit, it just can't sign anyone until March 2010. As I said, recruitment is not our biggest problem right now.

I would have thought that will be extended.... Breach the salary cap in 2008 and then add Jericho, Campbell, McGuiness, Massie to your list and get yourself under the Salary Cap.......

[nickname]

Norwood can still recruit, it just can't sign anyone until March 2010. As I said, recruitment is not our biggest problem right now.

That obviously would be against the spirit of the ban and presumably will not be allowed to happen. The edict simply needs to be that no new player from outside Norwood's zone can be registered for the 2010 season.

[JK]

Norwood can still recruit, it just can't sign anyone until March 2010. As I said, recruitment is not our biggest problem right now.

That obviously would be against the spirit of the ban and presumably will not be allowed to happen. The edict simply needs to be that no new player from outside Norwood's zone can be registered for the 2010 season.

But it wasn't the edict .. I think a one year ban from some date in March until the same date in March the following year was the ruling.

As AH said, any real Norwood fan wouldn't be at all concerned by recruiting when there's so much more to be fixed before that even rates a mention.

[Rik E Boy]

Did Norwood play that same game of handball, handball, handball?

No, we tried something different today. Instead of handballing to each other, we handballed to West players instead. You can't complain about the skills today .. there weren't any.

OUCH.

regards,

REB

[Adelaide Hawk]

I noted some posts about recruiting for 2010 re Norwood - What was norwoods ban for recruiting next year for the Slaray Cap Breach - Correct me if I am wrong (and I often am), Norwood couldnt recruit outside their zone next year? I dont know if that extended to the mini-draft though

Norwood can still recruit, it just can't sign anyone until March 2010. As I said, recruitment is not our biggest problem right now.

I would have thought that will be extended.... Breach the salary cap in 2008 and then add Jericho, Campbell, McGuiness, Massie to your list and get yourself under the Salary Cap.......

Yeah? Well, the other 8 clubs had better worry the SANFL doesn't decide to clamp down on salary cap breaches or you'll all go. The only reason Norwood were found out is because we owned up to it. God only knows why when we weren't doing anything the other clubs aren't doing. Another thing we've got wrong this season. Don't worry about us, worry about yourself.

[Thiele]

u/18s Result

West 25.15.165
Legs 6.9.45

[dedja]

u/18s Result

West 25.15.165
Legs 6.9.45

Pass us the salt Thiele ... Jeez, Westies 3-0 today

[Jars458]

The word going around is only one Norwood board member was at the Norwood Oval today, the rest apparently were at the Crows game, no doubt enjoying their free entertainment as SANFL officials. If this is true, they should be sacked immediately.

If that is true, that is a disgrace. The Board should never chose another club over their own.

[G]

Well I know their loyal ground announcer was at Norwood cos a few of my mates scabbed his Footy Park tickets

[JK]

Well I know their loyal ground announcer was at Norwood cos a few of my mates scabbed his Footy Park tickets

He is loyal indeed, soon he'll be the only one left to make announcements, pour beers, cook the barbie and switch the lights on/off

[MagareyLegend]

....... and coach

[bayman]

i thought the first 3 quarters that it was like watching to non chasers at the dogs race up the straight the way the game 'ebbed & flowed', i always thought from midway through the third term that west were doing enough to win & they were definately the more desperate of the 2 teams & infact i think malwoods only highlight of the day was sam rowe as he was the only malwood player to put his hand up for the entire game, sure others drifted in & out of the game but rowe clearly was malwoods only highlight for the day...special thanks to the bookies for over rating malwood as the odds of 6/4 were delightful

[am Bays]

There is absolutely no spirit in this 'Legs team, they seem to be playing as individuals, don't do any of the hard things and don't run, and if Soda's 3Q time report on Hill is correct, then he's completely lost the players.

For those at the ground who heard Hill's 3Q address, did he really say that he's had a gut full that the players don't listen to the coaches and asked them what they thought they should do in the last? If this is true then I'd agree with the many 'Legs supporters that have been asking for Hill's head, and more importantly, shows that the team is in disarray as they showed nothing in the last.

If this is true then I agree with Dedja, Hill has the lost the players as listening to it on the radio it sounded like they didn't give a yelp in the last qtr. Crikey the last quarter sounded so lame I actually turned it over to MMM to get a Crows score that how predictable the result seemed to be.

As a Bays fan I hope Hill stays, one less team to worry about, but for suffering fans like Fester, CP, AH et al for their sake I hope he falls on his sword because after appealing to the palyers and allegedly accusing them of not listening to the coaches, well after last qtr there is really on one course of action for him to take this week.

[nickname]

Norwood can still recruit, it just can't sign anyone until March 2010. As I said, recruitment is not our biggest problem right now.

That obviously would be against the spirit of the ban and presumably will not be allowed to happen. The edict simply needs to be that no new player from outside Norwood's zone can be registered for the 2010 season.

But it wasn't the edict .. I think a one year ban from some date in March until the same date in March the following year was the ruling.

As AH said, any real Norwood fan wouldn't be at all concerned by recruiting when there's so much more to be fixed before that even rates a mention.

Well I'd find it hard to believe that even the SANFL could allow the intent of one of their rulings to be so easily circumvented.

[Pigsy]

Pigsy thinks Trevor Hill is warming the seat for Brett James next season

[mal]

Well done WA
But it would be nice to play WA with 3/4 of a team instead of 1/2 team
Undermanned both defeats v WA in 2009


Have not seen the game
Will comment on the game after Ive seen the replay

[Wedgie]

Off Topic Sorry.

Thought todays game should of been played tomorrow and the Port North game Today.

My reasoning. Most norwood Suppoters are Crows so they would been at Aami. The crowd looked small today. Most Magpies supporters are Power supporters. With Power being live tomorrow it might be a small crowd at Alberton

Doubt it, with the Power playing the Cats most Port fans will be looking for an excuse to be nowhere near a TV.

[Adelaide Hawk]

Well done WA
But it would be nice to play WA with 3/4 of a team instead of 1/2 team
Undermanned both defeats v WA in 2009

Mal, you're only as good as the team you place on the park. Injuries may be a factor, but it's still not an excuse for the way we are playing.

Warren Partland wrote in the Sunday Mail that the game was not a game for the highlights reel. I've seen too many of those types of game this season.

[nickname]

Yeah? Well, the other 8 clubs had better worry the SANFL doesn't decide to clamp down on salary cap breaches or you'll all go. The only reason Norwood were found out is because we owned up to it. God only knows why when we weren't doing anything the other clubs aren't doing. Another thing we've got wrong this season. Don't worry about us, worry about yourself.

AH, what Norwood owned up to was a further small breach after being found to have breached the cap by a more substantial amount.
I believe they also breached the cap in 2007. Can they make it 3 in a row?

[Adelaide Hawk]

Yeah? Well, the other 8 clubs had better worry the SANFL doesn't decide to clamp down on salary cap breaches or you'll all go. The only reason Norwood were found out is because we owned up to it. God only knows why when we weren't doing anything the other clubs aren't doing. Another thing we've got wrong this season. Don't worry about us, worry about yourself.

AH, what Norwood owned up to was a further small breach after being found to have breached the cap by a more substantial amount.
I believe they also breached the cap in 2007. Can they make it 3 in a row?

And will other clubs come clean as Norwood did?