Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby GWW » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:19 pm

Something was mentioned about post on the Roost re Jarman having re-signed for another year. Will he be coaching the Roosters next year, haven't heard or seen anything anywhere else..
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Rnd 21: Port thrash North @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:15 am

TigerBoss wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:If I was a Bays fan, I would have been hoping that North made the finals as they are the only team you have a change of beating.


So we're sitting second on the table because we've only been able to beat North all year? Could have sworn we'd won a few more games than that.

PS - a change of beating?



Thanks for highlighting my typo TB. :roll: How many games since your last win ? You've gone from a gallop, to a canter, to a trot, and now you are tide up outside the saloon. I would have thought you would have preferred a sh1t team like North in the finals. Still PAM to come before that.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby johntheclaret » Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:26 am

Grahaml wrote:I know it's harsh to make a call based on a few comments, but in the paper today I thought it was really significant that ANJ talked about his players as "they". In fact I thought it was hard of him to say "they let him down" when talking about Wintle. Compare this to Laird's comments always being "we" and I think perhaps Jarman thinks too much as the job of winning being the players responsibility alone and not much to do with him while Laird considers himself part of the "team". this could come back to their playing days where Laird would do a job for the team and Jarman would just play. Anyway, just a small thing I thought might be significant to his mindset and another excuse to sink the boot in to ANJ.


Actually graham I think you raise a pretty good point.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Rnd 21: Port thrash North @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby TigerBoss » Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:30 am

johntheclaret wrote:
TigerBoss wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:If I was a Bays fan, I would have been hoping that North made the finals as they are the only team you have a change of beating.


So we're sitting second on the table because we've only been able to beat North all year? Could have sworn we'd won a few more games than that.

PS - a change of beating?



Thanks for highlighting my typo TB. :roll: How many games since your last win ? You've gone from a gallop, to a canter, to a trot, and now you are tide up outside the saloon. I would have thought you would have preferred a sh1t team like North in the finals. Still PAM to come before that.


Hmmm...I thought it was "tied" up, but if you want my horse to reflect the ocean, um, I'll see what I can do...

PS - our last win came against your rabble of a side...you must have a short memory.
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
User avatar
TigerBoss
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Snout's Bar!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Lock

Re: Rnd 21: Port thrash North @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:31 am

TigerBoss wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
TigerBoss wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:If I was a Bays fan, I would have been hoping that North made the finals as they are the only team you have a change of beating.


So we're sitting second on the table because we've only been able to beat North all year? Could have sworn we'd won a few more games than that.

PS - a change of beating?



Thanks for highlighting my typo TB. :roll: How many games since your last win ? You've gone from a gallop, to a canter, to a trot, and now you are tide up outside the saloon. I would have thought you would have preferred a sh1t team like North in the finals. Still PAM to come before that.


Hmmm...I thought it was "tied" up, but if you want my horse to reflect the ocean, um, I'll see what I can do...

PS - our last win came against your rabble of a side...you must have a short memory.


But TB all year you have been saying how North is actually a good side and better than it's supporters are giving credit for etc. etc. yet now we are a rabble :? It's difficult to keep up with you. What is it? Is North a rabble or actually a very talented well coached side??
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby TigerBoss » Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:24 pm

North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
User avatar
TigerBoss
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Snout's Bar!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Lock

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:56 pm

TigerBoss wrote:North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.


Okay i get it, North are a talented well coached side masquerading as a rabble at times.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby Country Cock » Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:08 pm

:shock: That's a massive drop in 1 year, same as the Power Puffs, runner up to 3rd bottom in 11 months ! :?
User avatar
Country Cock
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Copper Coast Triangle
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby Grahaml » Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:52 pm

TigerBoss wrote:North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.


Lol. Me thinks someone's been breathing too much sea air!
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby NO-MERCY » Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:01 pm

I hear Prospect Oval was inspected Friday by some Port people & found to be in great shape, not to be Sat morning when the Bs started.
The centre square was flooded overnight to maybe stop the influence of someone like Micklejohn??
As we know Micklejohn done more than his fair share in the middle, he completely dominated around the ground actually, maybe not a good ploy from Jarman, he forgot about blokes like Depasqualea, Elstone & Murray that love that wet muddy sh!t they dished up. :lol:
That backfired big time didn't it? :oops:
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby drebin » Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:19 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
TigerBoss wrote:North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.


Okay i get it, North are a talented well coached side masquerading as a rabble at times.


Don't bother responding RR - TB is just acting the fool
drebin
 

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:34 pm

drebin wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
TigerBoss wrote:North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.


Okay i get it, North are a talented well coached side masquerading as a rabble at times.


Don't bother responding RR - TB is just acting the fool


Yeah, i know drebin, it just amuses me that he keeps contadicting himself continuously to suit his argument on any given day. First of all North are a really good side and the North supporters are fickle because we dare hi-light the flaws we see with the club then the next minute we are a rabble. Extremelly confusing if you ask me :D
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby TigerBoss » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:59 pm

drebin wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
TigerBoss wrote:North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.


Okay i get it, North are a talented well coached side masquerading as a rabble at times.


Don't bother responding RR - TB is just acting the fool


Image
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
User avatar
TigerBoss
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Snout's Bar!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Lock

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby maxyoz » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:41 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
drebin wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
TigerBoss wrote:North:

vs Bays - Good.

vs Port/South - Rabble.


Okay i get it, North are a talented well coached side masquerading as a rabble at times.


Don't bother responding RR - TB is just acting the fool


Yeah, i know drebin, it just amuses me that he keeps contadicting himself continuously to suit his argument on any given day. First of all North are a really good side and the North supporters are fickle because we dare hi-light the flaws we see with the club then the next minute we are a rabble. Extremelly confusing if you ask me :D


I reckon acting the fool would be a lot less painful than contadicting ones self**.

Anyway, didn't see the game, but sounds like North have had an average couple of weeks after being so promising against Centrals.
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
User avatar
maxyoz
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:53 am
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 36 times
Grassroots Team: Kimba Districts

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:52 pm

maxyoz wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
Yeah, i know drebin, it just amuses me that he keeps contadicting himself continuously to suit his argument on any given day. First of all North are a really good side and the North supporters are fickle because we dare hi-light the flaws we see with the club then the next minute we are a rabble. Extremelly confusing if you ask me :D


I reckon acting the fool would be a lot less painful than contadicting ones self**.

Anyway, didn't see the game, but sounds like North have had an average couple of weeks after being so promising against Centrals.


Is there anything Glenelg supporters can come up with other than pointing out people's spelling errors? Highly entertaining and insightful. Sure adds to the discussion :roll:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby Ian » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:53 pm

maxyoz wrote:
Anyway, didn't see the game, but sounds like North have had an average couple of weeks after being so promising against Centrals.


I didn't think they were that ordinary against the Gays, last 5-10 minutes excepted, against Port though, yes, very ordinary.
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby maxyoz » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:55 pm

Ian wrote:
maxyoz wrote:
Anyway, didn't see the game, but sounds like North have had an average couple of weeks after being so promising against Centrals.


I didn't think they were that ordinary against the Gays, last 5-10 minutes excepted, against Port though, yes, very ordinary.


Don't know about that one either, Ian, also wasn't witness to that game.

But against Glenelg I guess they showed a little bit for most of the game, until Glenelg woke up, played 10 minutes of footy and ended up with a solid win.
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
User avatar
maxyoz
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:53 am
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 36 times
Grassroots Team: Kimba Districts

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby Ian » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:59 pm

maxyoz wrote:until Glenelg woke up, played 10 minutes of footy and ended up with a solid win.


woken up by a naked man :lol: :lol:


:wink:
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Re: Rnd 21: North v Port @ Prospect - REVIEW

Postby Adam4 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:08 pm

Ian wrote:
maxyoz wrote:until Glenelg woke up, played 10 minutes of footy and ended up with a solid win.


woken up by a naked man :lol: :lol:


:wink:


Arrrrrrrrrrrrr! The common thread .......... Gays and naked man!
Adam4
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:43 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Walkerville

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MannyK and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |