Columbo wrote:holden78 wrote:cd wrote:Pleasing to see that sense prevails and the sturt lad's report has been withdrawn - was worth the free kick and probably the 50m.
Agree with Micky - the lads coming through look to be a very exciting group but will we keep them??
Re the advantage rule i think the ump had called time off in our case and thus the game had stopped and couldnt call advatage whereas time wasnt called in the Sturt case - if wrong happy to be corrected.
Col D
Personal Post Only
None of them will be drafted if they are the draft is full of crap
Or will they be drafted and show that Ron and his colleagues have once again uncovered some quality youngsters, depends if you see the glass half empty or half full i guess.
I am more than happy with the juniors .We as a "Club" seem to unearth some very good young talent.Where we as a "club" fall in a hole with the juniors is that at State time we lose a chunk of good talent.Or when they are playing School footy we lose them for a chunk of time .
And the same applies at Junior footy finals the seconds team all go off and play under 17/19 finals.
To me we lack players that are over age but second tier .By that I mean guys that play seconds but can step up for the league side when needed .