Ian wrote:Alleway is not going to Norwood, he will be at North in 2011 (from the horses mouth a couple of weeks ago)
see article in 'tiser
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/alleway-gill-commit-to-roosters/story-fn525un5-1225942334075
by Ian » Fri Oct 22, 2010 5:45 pm
Ian wrote:Alleway is not going to Norwood, he will be at North in 2011 (from the horses mouth a couple of weeks ago)
by Dogwatcher » Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:44 pm
by leftlegger » Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:14 pm
on the rails wrote:Ian wrote:bayman wrote:i think it is down to two clubs north & wwt from a whisper i heard on jetty road today
I was told today "he is 95% sure to becoming a Rooster"
Hmm just what North needs - another "outside" receiver! ?
by jim5112 » Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:49 pm
leftlegger wrote:on the rails wrote:Ian wrote:bayman wrote:i think it is down to two clubs north & wwt from a whisper i heard on jetty road today
I was told today "he is 95% sure to becoming a Rooster"
Hmm just what North needs - another "outside" receiver! ?
Well you havent really seen much of Brett play then have you.
He is is a tough little nut and a hard worker. Considering he is one the smallest blokes out there, he throws himself into the fray as well as providing plenty of run. Whoever gets him will get a great little player.
by leftlegger » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:57 am
by on the rails » Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:52 pm
by milbo » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:42 pm
by westcoastpanther » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:33 pm
milbo wrote:From someone who watched the majority of Brett's footy.... he aint no seagull. Thats a very uneducated (on this issue) assessment of the player. His in and under work was fantastic as was his second efforts and ability to dive headlong into a pack.
by milbo » Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:26 am
westcoastpanther wrote:milbo wrote:From someone who watched the majority of Brett's footy.... he aint no seagull. Thats a very uneducated (on this issue) assessment of the player. His in and under work was fantastic as was his second efforts and ability to dive headlong into a pack.
by zipzap » Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:48 pm
by G » Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:27 pm
by whufc » Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:50 pm
G wrote:Note zip zap that in your little video clip that Backwell at least has the footy and is taking on the would be tackler - North didnt have many who were getting the ball![]()
![]()
I would welcome him if he does in fact move.
by zipzap » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:51 pm
G wrote:Note zip zap that in your little video clip that Backwell at least has the footy and is taking on the would be tackler - North didnt have many who were getting the ball![]()
![]()
I would welcome him if he does in fact move.
by hottie » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:22 pm
by maxyoz » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:15 pm
hottie wrote:He will play for which club will offer the most money.
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
by wycbloods » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:17 pm
maxyoz wrote:hottie wrote:He will play for which club will offer the most money.
Nope, said he's not interested in South or West.
by Jugs » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:28 pm
maxyoz wrote:hottie wrote:He will play for which club will offer the most money.
Nope, said he's not interested in South or West.
by nickname » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:11 pm
maxyoz wrote:hottie wrote:He will play for which club will offer the most money.
Nope, said he's not interested in South or West.
by CENTURION » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:40 am
nickname wrote:maxyoz wrote:hottie wrote:He will play for which club will offer the most money.
Nope, said he's not interested in South or West.
West? When's the last time we trumped another club for a recruit, with a bigger offer?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |