Aerie wrote:The rain in the cricket will help. This thread more chance to get to 299 than Australia unfortunately.
Like!!!
by UK Fan » Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:33 pm
Aerie wrote:The rain in the cricket will help. This thread more chance to get to 299 than Australia unfortunately.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by PhilH » Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:40 pm
by SDK » Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:15 am
by BirdOfPrey » Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:16 am
by areaman » Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:29 am
PhilH wrote:As the side virtually representing 8 SANFL clubs in the AFL the Crows have always has a large SANFL factor in their supporter base.
Sure it is 23 years later but I wonder how much support the Crows may lose if they do not play this right and become a competitor rather than partner.
by SABRE » Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:33 am
SDK wrote:Many people on this forum are saying talk of the Crows coming into the SANFL is affecting crowds THIS year. What will it be like when they actually get in ?????????????
The Crows self interest has a lot to answer for and I am disgusted by it. I feel like vomiting when I am forced to look at Steven Trigg on my television. The Crows having a reserves side is such a minor issue in the scheme of things and this poor excuse for a human being is willing to prostitute himself to achieve something so lacking in importance to the Crows abject failure as a club.
This poor excuse for a football club is trying to deny thousands of people something they live and die for week in week out and have no interest in watching a hybrid basketball game called AFL.
by whufc » Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:56 am
areaman wrote:PhilH wrote:As the side virtually representing 8 SANFL clubs in the AFL the Crows have always has a large SANFL factor in their supporter base.
Sure it is 23 years later but I wonder how much support the Crows may lose if they do not play this right and become a competitor rather than partner.
This is where I can't get my head around what is likely to happen next year.
How can a rational person support their AFL team on a Saturday and then barrack against that same teams reserves side on a Sunday.
Regardless of intention the Crows are turning themselves into a rival to the Eagles (in my case).
It's just loopy.
by stan » Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:01 am
SDK wrote:Many people on this forum are saying talk of the Crows coming into the SANFL is affecting crowds THIS year. What will it be like when they actually get in ?????????????
The Crows self interest has a lot to answer for and I am disgusted by it. I feel like vomiting when I am forced to look at Steven Trigg on my television. The Crows having a reserves side is such a minor issue in the scheme of things and this poor excuse for a human being is willing to prostitute himself to achieve something so lacking in importance to the Crows abject failure as a club.
This poor excuse for a football club is trying to deny thousands of people something they live and die for week in week out and have no interest in watching a hybrid basketball game called AFL.
by saintal » Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:24 am
by whufc » Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:26 am
by saintal » Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:20 am
by UK Fan » Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:31 am
whufc wrote:areaman wrote:PhilH wrote:As the side virtually representing 8 SANFL clubs in the AFL the Crows have always has a large SANFL factor in their supporter base.
Sure it is 23 years later but I wonder how much support the Crows may lose if they do not play this right and become a competitor rather than partner.
This is where I can't get my head around what is likely to happen next year.
How can a rational person support their AFL team on a Saturday and then barrack against that same teams reserves side on a Sunday.
Regardless of intention the Crows are turning themselves into a rival to the Eagles (in my case).
It's just loopy.
Exactly! So what we will see is people will either choose the AFL or the SANFL and no doubt the majority will choose the bright lights.
Take a look at the SANFL reserves GF if that has a team in like last year Centrals who are not in the league final as well they are lucky to get 200 of their supporters there.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Dutchy » Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:47 am
PhilH wrote:Not that desperate
To answer - Winning a flag always helps.
Highlight of my time here was taking the premiership cup around the community and sharing it with as many locals as we could. (although I was always scared of it going missing).
Eagles had a solid adult membership and home crowd boost in 2012 after the 2011 flag (hosting ANZAC Day game the big advantage).
But from a kids view point it's the accessibility and the experience that is key.
When I came back from QLD in 1999 it is probably fair to say I was more Crows than Eagles, it was just easier to follow AFL from QLD than SANFL (remember minimal internet then).
I moved to Sportsman's Drive West Lakes just 150m from AAMI all set for a great season of AFL action with the occasional Eagles game.
But I just found the SANFL a much easier & enjoyable product and then when my kids soon arrived they too preferred an afternoon they could roll around the hill at Woodville to being boxed into a small seat at AAMI.
It got to the point where I watched the last showdown and as the Power stormed home I felt ............ nothing.![]()
As the side virtually representing 8 SANFL clubs in the AFL the Crows have always has a large SANFL factor in their supporter base.
Sure it is 23 years later but I wonder how much support the Crows may lose if they do not play this right and become a competitor rather than partner.
by Ecky » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:03 am
PhilH wrote:How may kids do you know support the Aussies test cricket side and the English ODI side?
Actually just on this one does anyone remember the ODI series a while back that had an Australian side and an Australian A side in it? Zimbabwe was another side.
Aussies love an underdog and when these two sides actually clashed most got behind Australia A much to the anger of the Australian first XI.
Never happened again.
Could it translate to SANFL where supporters with divided loyalties go for the underdog (SANFL) against the AFL goliaths.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by areaman » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:27 am
Ecky wrote:Yes, we do love the underdogs, but I'm not sure how much sympathy there will be in this case when the SANFL clubs had the choice to say no to the AFL but are presumably saying yes instead! People are less likely to help someone if their wounds are self-inflicted...
Maybe this will be come a factor in the longer term when the current boards and administrators move on, but in the short term I reckon the attitude will be "well you (the SANFL) chose to go down this path (against the wishes of the majority of your members) so you will have to live with the consequences of your actions".
by topsywaldron » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:47 am
by areaman » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:53 am
topsywaldron wrote:Name another organisation that happily ignores the wishes of its core customers on the basis that 'bad things may happen in the future'.
I know of few other bodies as venal and intellectually bankrupt as the SANFL
by Footy Smart » Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:20 pm
SDK wrote:Many people on this forum are saying talk of the Crows coming into the SANFL is affecting crowds THIS year. What will it be like when they actually get in ?????????????
The Crows self interest has a lot to answer for and I am disgusted by it. I feel like vomiting when I am forced to look at Steven Trigg on my television. The Crows having a reserves side is such a minor issue in the scheme of things and this poor excuse for a human being is willing to prostitute himself to achieve something so lacking in importance to the Crows abject failure as a club.
This poor excuse for a football club is trying to deny thousands of people something they live and die for week in week out and have no interest in watching a hybrid basketball game called AFL.
by Ecky » Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:27 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |