by saintal » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:08 am
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:10 am
by saintal » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:11 am
Aerie wrote:It was 7-1 last night. Surprising which club was the only one against. A club that probably doesn't hold much sway in the competition (again, my thoughts only).
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:12 am
Aerie wrote:There has to be guarantees put in place to make sure Sturt and West survive short term. This is easier with all of SA Football going in the same direction. Any money spent on these clubs surviving until we can reap West Lakes, SMA and licence fees is money well spent. I think some sort of guarantees need to be put in place before this goes ahead that our clubs are guaranteed to survive for a certain number of years.
This decision is a gamble, but so is everything.
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:14 am
saintal wrote:Aerie wrote:It was 7-1 last night. Surprising which club was the only one against. A club that probably doesn't hold much sway in the competition (again, my thoughts only).
Why does the South vote surprise you, just out of interest? And do you think the club was being honest with this 7-1 count, and wasn't fudging figures so they didn't look like the only bad guys in all this? Would love to know what Centrals and Norwood are thinking.
by LPH » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:18 am
saintal wrote:Aerie wrote:It was 7-1 last night. Surprising which club was the only one against. A club that probably doesn't hold much sway in the competition (again, my thoughts only).
Why does the South vote surprise you, just out of interest? And do you think the club was being honest with this 7-1 count, and wasn't fudging figures so they didn't look like the only bad guys in all this? Would love to know what Centrals and Norwood are thinking.
by Aerie » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:21 am
saintal wrote:Aerie wrote:It was 7-1 last night. Surprising which club was the only one against. A club that probably doesn't hold much sway in the competition (again, my thoughts only).
Why does the South vote surprise you, just out of interest? And do you think the club was being honest with this 7-1 count, and wasn't fudging figures so they didn't look like the only bad guys in all this? Would love to know what Centrals and Norwood are thinking.
by eaglesfan » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:23 am
by saintal » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:24 am
by Mark_Beswick » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:29 am
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:29 am
by Disco » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:42 am
csbowes wrote:
Why does the South vote surprise you, just out of interest? And do you think the club was being honest with this 7-1 count, and wasn't fudging figures so they didn't look like the only bad guys in all this? Would love to know what Centrals and Norwood are thinking.
If South were the only club to vote no...
... then South is where my money will go from hereon.
I think everyone on here should do the same, if they are the only club to have voted against it, we should let our own clubs know we are cancelling our membership and backing South Adelaide from here on.
Who would have thought... a club that has experienced so little success in the last 100 years, is the only one to stand strong. The mouse that roared in many ways, while our so called big clubs all pissed their pants and ran away.
by Brendan M » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:47 am
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:48 am
by LPH » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:52 am
csbowes wrote:What was the answer to the "why don't we get a vote?" question?
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:53 am
LEH wrote:csbowes wrote:What was the answer to the "why don't we get a vote?" question?
See my post, re: The WWTFC Constitution
by Aerie » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:56 am
csbowes wrote:LEH wrote:csbowes wrote:What was the answer to the "why don't we get a vote?" question?
See my post, re: The WWTFC Constitution
But did someone ask that question and get that answer?
by Aerie » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:07 am
by bays2011 » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:09 am
csbowes wrote:What the hell are we all going to do next season?
Adelaide United for me...
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:22 am
csbowes wrote:whufc wrote:csbowes wrote:I'm sure Sturt were out front pushing the yes vote, blinded by the fiver Adelaide dropped on the ground before them. It's disgraceful.
My club will fold due to this decision.
Are serious question CSBowes
Are Sturt going to be able to afford to replace the key players they lose, that's going to be a fair bit of coin in transfer fees.
If they can't they are looking at another wooden spoon dynasty which as u said will fold the club.
No chance in hell we could afford to replace them. We will replace them with reserves players without doubt.
A spoon dynasty is a given. I just can't believe our stupidity.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |