by LPH » Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:41 pm
by csbowes » Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:43 pm
by csbowes » Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:47 pm
LEH wrote:According to Slavin, South were the only club to vote NO last night
by once_were_warriors » Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:54 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:once_were_warriors wrote:I can, here right now , we are voting yes
may I enquire as to what benefits the club put forward to you members for voting yes??
by Pseudo » Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:59 pm
once_were_warriors wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:once_were_warriors wrote:I can, here right now , we are voting yes
may I enquire as to what benefits the club put forward to you members for voting yes??
I sum it up that basically the Sanfl clubs are scared of the consequences of the crows playing anywhere else but Sanfl , loss of revenue, tv , news media etc
by whufc » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:02 pm
by csbowes » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:07 pm
whufc wrote:Yep!!!!!
The SANFL is dead if we can't get our 15 seconds a week in commercial tv
How do these muppets get to the positions they are
by whufc » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:16 pm
csbowes wrote:whufc wrote:Yep!!!!!
The SANFL is dead if we can't get our 15 seconds a week in commercial tv
How do these muppets get to the positions they are
It f****n defies logic...
I suppose its our fault for not running for the boards ourselves, we end up with gutless tools.
by RB » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:31 pm
by whufc » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:36 pm
RB wrote:Slaven's speech tonight was basically a justification for caving in, based on fear and false assumptions. He said that WWTFC would suffer if the Crows had reserves in the amateur league. His reason for voting yes was that the club would try and use the Crows to boost their junior membership etc. He referred to the fact that he believed it important that there be a 'nexus' between the SANFL and the Crows. However he kept saying that he 'didn't know' how it would all pan out, and admitted that many of the predictions, such as Chapman's prediction that the Crows would get 4,000 every week, were impossible to be sure of at this stage.
Slaven argued that we should not reject change, but in the end he did not really explain why this would be a positive for the club or why we needed to do this. While he did not tell any obvious outright untruths, little of what he said was relevant or reason enough to do something which could seriously threaten the short and long term viability of the club. I sincerely apologize on behalf of my club to all the real SANFL supporters on this site for whom the SANFL is set to be forever sullied by the presence of the VFL reserves teams...
by csbowes » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:39 pm
by dedja » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:40 pm
by saintal » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:41 pm
csbowes wrote:I continue to be amazed how clubs can make a decision on their and the leagues future without it being sanctioned by the membership... clubs are run by the board for the board and they don't give a rats about the fans that keep it afloat.
by RB » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:42 pm
whufc wrote:Sorry RB I had gained so much respect for your club due to so many great on field battles but honestly I have no respect left for that weak as piss football club!! History has a funny way of repeating and this club caves in when ever the going gets tough!!!
by RB » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:43 pm
dedja wrote:Because most Boards are boys' clubs
by whufc » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:44 pm
RB wrote:dedja wrote:Because most Boards are boys' clubs
Spot on. It's a yes men mentality.
by Dutchy » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:48 pm
RB wrote:Slaven's speech tonight was basically a justification for caving in, based on fear and false assumptions. He said that WWTFC would suffer if the Crows had reserves in the amateur league. His reason for voting yes was that the club would try and use the Crows to boost their junior membership etc. He referred to the fact that he believed it important that there be a 'nexus' between the SANFL and the Crows. However he kept saying that he 'didn't know' how it would all pan out, and admitted that many of the predictions, such as Chapman's prediction that the Crows would get 4,000 every week, were impossible to be sure of at this stage.
Slaven argued that we should not reject change, but in the end he did not really explain why this would be a positive for the club or why we needed to do this. While he did not tell any obvious outright untruths, little of what he said was relevant or reason enough to do something which could seriously threaten the short and long term viability of the club. I sincerely apologize on behalf of my club to all the real SANFL supporters on this site for whom the SANFL is set to be forever sullied by the presence of the VFL reserves teams...
by whufc » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:51 pm
by csbowes » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:54 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |