SA Footy

RB wrote:

topshelf wrote:The possibility of getting extra money from channel 7 to telecast games

Extra money?

I thought the SANFL paid them to show it.

RB wrote:

topshelf wrote:The possibility of getting extra money from channel 7 to telecast games

Extra money?

I thought the SANFL paid them to show it.

Brett wrote:My tip is no one on here knows what will happen. They might like to think they do but do not know.

Dutchy wrote:

RB wrote:

topshelf wrote:The possibility of getting extra money from channel 7 to telecast games

Extra money?

I thought the SANFL paid them to show it.

CH7 have the rights to one game per round, other games up are for grabs

LMA wrote:
What if all games are on at the same time? You honestly think a rival network would assemble a team to broadcast SANFL for the sake of say 4 games in 4 weeks. I reckon the SANFL won't start until the AFL do, or at best 1 week earlier. All will be revealed after Gil's presser next week.

If the state's success continues, the league could trump the AFL by starting the season earlier than its original plan of May 31 — albeit without crowds — in a move that could potentially create new broadcast opportunities and satiate a sport-hungry public.

Brett wrote:My tip is no one on here knows what will happen. They might like to think they do but do not know.

Brett wrote:Cant we just agree we have no idea what will happen? Know alls that know nothing.

DOC wrote:

Brett wrote:My tip is no one on here knows what will happen. They might like to think they do but do not know.

So, if anyone thinks you are correct then they are wrong as well?

Dutchy wrote:

LMA wrote:
What if all games are on at the same time? You honestly think a rival network would assemble a team to broadcast SANFL for the sake of say 4 games in 4 weeks. I reckon the SANFL won't start until the AFL do, or at best 1 week earlier. All will be revealed after Gil's presser next week.

All games are already streamed, CH7 could actually do it and on sell it to Fox, I guarantee if footy was live on TV before AFL it would have a national audience

If the state's success continues, the league could trump the AFL by starting the season earlier than its original plan of May 31 — albeit without crowds — in a move that could potentially create new broadcast opportunities and satiate a sport-hungry public.

Brett wrote:Some outlandish comments. Dutchy show us the evidence of this comment :

All games are already streamed, CH7 could actually do it and on sell it to Fox, I guarantee if footy was live on TV before AFL it would have a national audience

Thanks

LMA wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

LMA wrote:
What if all games are on at the same time? You honestly think a rival network would assemble a team to broadcast SANFL for the sake of say 4 games in 4 weeks. I reckon the SANFL won't start until the AFL do, or at best 1 week earlier. All will be revealed after Gil's presser next week.

All games are already streamed, CH7 could actually do it and on sell it to Fox, I guarantee if footy was live on TV before AFL it would have a national audience

If the state's success continues, the league could trump the AFL by starting the season earlier than its original plan of May 31 — albeit without crowds — in a move that could potentially create new broadcast opportunities and satiate a sport-hungry public.

Absolutely people would watch it, I just feel that it wouldn't be that easy.

UK Fan wrote:

LMA wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

LMA wrote:
What if all games are on at the same time? You honestly think a rival network would assemble a team to broadcast SANFL for the sake of say 4 games in 4 weeks. I reckon the SANFL won't start until the AFL do, or at best 1 week earlier. All will be revealed after Gil's presser next week.

All games are already streamed, CH7 could actually do it and on sell it to Fox, I guarantee if footy was live on TV before AFL it would have a national audience

If the state's success continues, the league could trump the AFL by starting the season earlier than its original plan of May 31 — albeit without crowds — in a move that could potentially create new broadcast opportunities and satiate a sport-hungry public.

Absolutely people would watch it, I just feel that it wouldn't be that easy.

As Dutchy said it would be very easy. The camera/commentary crews are all set up it’s just a matter of negotiation.

LMA wrong again. Who would of thought

Dutchy wrote:

Brett wrote:Some outlandish comments. Dutchy show us the evidence of this comment :

All games are already streamed, CH7 could actually do it and on sell it to Fox, I guarantee if footy was live on TV before AFL it would have a national audience

Thanks

https://sanfldigitalpass.com.au/#/

Wedgie wrote:The VFL 2020 season has been cancelled with all 18 AFL clubs agreeing on cost cutting so there's no way the Crows or Power would participate in a SANFL this year.
Sets up perfectly for a 14 round minor round this year with 21 next year onwards preferably.

LMA wrote:

UK Fan wrote:As Dutchy said it would be very easy. The camera/commentary crews are all set up it’s just a matter of negotiation.

LMA wrong again. Who would of thought

We'll see. Is the footage and commentary up to standard to broadcast nationally on a platform like Foxtel though?