smac wrote:JK wrote:adelaidefc wrote: tried to answer all these but it seems to have disappeared
Check Triggy's Outlook
Filed under "Tippett"?
Don't mention the War...
by LPH » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:15 pm
smac wrote:JK wrote:adelaidefc wrote: tried to answer all these but it seems to have disappeared
Check Triggy's Outlook
Filed under "Tippett"?
by heater31 » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:17 pm
smac wrote:The top of the table clash today in div 1 was full of blokes not quite up to it. What development would they offer your players?
by PhilH » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:17 pm
by daysofourlives » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:18 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Jim05 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I believe the Crows going to SAAFL would be a very sticky result for the SANFL.
Do explain
SANFL clubs are already struggling with player retention due to the cash on offer in some SAAFL grades and in the country.
All of a sudden, a Crows side is in the SAAFL, players head there wanting to play for the Crows.
Crows will have to have a B grade side as well in SAAFL, there's some more players.
SANFL players start thinking that, even if they're not in the Crows, the chance to play under the noses of the Crows and be observed by Crows officials means they consider crossing to a top-flight SAAFL club.
The Crows in the SAAFL sees additional media directed towards that league, eating into SANFL coverage which has already shrunk over the years.
While the Crows also direct valuable funds, which would have gone to the SANFL clubs, towards the SAAFL.
Prestige is a very important part of the SANFL package but that prestige could be significantly reduced by a Crows side taking SANFL standard players to the SAAFL.
Those are all obviously worse case scenarios, but an SANFL side breaking away and trying to join the AFL wasn't a scenario we all thought would happen in 1990 either, was it?
by rod_rooster » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:20 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Jim05 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I believe the Crows going to SAAFL would be a very sticky result for the SANFL.
Do explain
SANFL clubs are already struggling with player retention due to the cash on offer in some SAAFL grades and in the country.
All of a sudden, a Crows side is in the SAAFL, players head there wanting to play for the Crows.
Crows will have to have a B grade side as well in SAAFL, there's some more players.
SANFL players start thinking that, even if they're not in the Crows, the chance to play under the noses of the Crows and be observed by Crows officials means they consider crossing to a top-flight SAAFL club.
The Crows in the SAAFL sees additional media directed towards that league, eating into SANFL coverage which has already shrunk over the years.
While the Crows also direct valuable funds, which would have gone to the SANFL clubs, towards the SAAFL.
Prestige is a very important part of the SANFL package but that prestige could be significantly reduced by a Crows side taking SANFL standard players to the SAAFL.
Those are all obviously worse case scenarios, but an SANFL side breaking away and trying to join the AFL wasn't a scenario we all thought would happen in 1990 either, was it?
Only problem for these players is they must be on an SANFL clubs list to be drafted. The AFC would like us to believe players will move but in reality unless the AFL changes the rules nothing will change.
by sjt » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:24 pm
adelaidefc wrote:sjt wrote:adelaidefc wrote:SDK wrote:One more thing.
If the Crows could show me ..... and all the SANFL supporters ...... a solid, logical, well planned and presented proposal why and how the Crows joining the SANFL would be a benefit I would support it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We all would.
BUT the xxxxing xxxts have not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How does that look for you? What benefits do you think are required? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
David Burtenshaw (SANFL fan and Crows GM of Comms)
Hi David
1)If you could show how the entry of two afl clubs in the wafl has benefited the other wafl teams?
2) how much have crowds increased at wafl games?
3) how has media interest increased in that competition and how has this translated to gate takings and commercial deals for the wafl clubs?
4) financially how have the wafl clubs benefited and how much would the sanfl clubs benefit , is the financial offer on the table comparable?
5) will the extra cost to the crows of having the proposed reserves side, translate to lower distributions to the clubs.
6) how much does the afl contribute directly to the sanfl clubs each year (excluding afl license dividends)? Is it truly under $1m?
7) how did Rob chapman arrive at 4,000 supporters going to a reserves game - particularly given with four times the population the crowds in Victoria are a quarter of sa? Does chapman think SA fans are that gullible?how will crows players going to the community be of benefit to an sanfl club
9) how is dropping the salary cap by $20,000 going to make it easier for SA clubs to replace lost afl listed players, retain players and attract quality players.
10) how is "playing to the line", that is making sure an afl player plays finals (if medically sound) against an sanfl club, potentially even their "own" club seen as a positive, for sanfl fans?
11) what current Adelaide players do you believe due to playing sanfl are having hindered development?
12) why wouldn't the sanfl be better off selling the licenses, leasing footy park training facilities to you, deriving income from Adelaide oval, developing west lakes land, increasing its salary cap to improve quality, rather than accept the pittance from the Afc that has been described?
13) why not trial it in the reserves?
14) is the reserves deemed a higher standard than the saafl?
15) if its not a higher standard why do you want top up players from the reserves?
16) is the only positive you can offer, the threat of what might happen if it doesn't proceed?
17) is threatening to try to take sanfl club sponsors if the vote is no, a serious threat?
18) do you think sanfl sponsors would sponsor the crows in the saafl rather than their sanfl side, given they support the sanfl now even with little media exposure?
Just a few simple questions, I'd have a number more. Given the eighteen months of research the club has done and the millions of dollars worth of resources you have, I imagine these answers are easily attainable.
I thank you for communicating on this site and look forward to your response. It would be great to finally get some simple answers, supported by basic facts , rather than the puffery and spin so far been distributed.
Kind regards
SJT
Sanfl supporter (former crows member)
I tried to answer all these but it seems to have disappeared
by once_were_warriors » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:27 pm
smac wrote:JK wrote:adelaidefc wrote: tried to answer all these but it seems to have disappeared
Check Triggy's Outlook
Filed under "Tippett"?
by RB » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:36 pm
sjt wrote:Maybe three answers per post David? Otherwise it's pretty frustrating going to the effort and it all disappears. Cheers
by dedja » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:43 pm
by saintal » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:43 pm
adelaidefc wrote:SDK wrote:One more thing.
If the Crows could show me ..... and all the SANFL supporters ...... a solid, logical, well planned and presented proposal why and how the Crows joining the SANFL would be a benefit I would support it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We all would.
BUT the xxxxing xxxts have not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How does that look for you? What benefits do you think are required? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
David Burtenshaw (SANFL fan and Crows GM of Comms)
by LPH » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:51 pm
dedja wrote:Give the poor fella a break ... this technology stuff like blogs, forums and stuff is challenging for a journalst who is General Manager of Communications.
FFS ...
by topsywaldron » Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:51 pm
saintal wrote:As the now famous Dion Hayman article said "People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul."
by Pseudo » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:22 am
best for comp wrote:Please all parties step back from degrading our sanfl comp and vote yes
wank
wank
wank
...
by Pseudo » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:26 am
Jim05 wrote:Im sure you would never label the pro AFL group as rabble
by daysofourlives » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:26 am
adelaidefc wrote:SDK wrote:One more thing.
If the Crows could show me ..... and all the SANFL supporters ...... a solid, logical, well planned and presented proposal why and how the Crows joining the SANFL would be a benefit I would support it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We all would.
BUT the xxxxing xxxts have not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How does that look for you? What benefits do you think are required? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
David Burtenshaw (SANFL fan and Crows GM of Comms)
by Apachebulldog » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:26 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:30 am
daysofourlives wrote:adelaidefc wrote:SDK wrote:One more thing.
If the Crows could show me ..... and all the SANFL supporters ...... a solid, logical, well planned and presented proposal why and how the Crows joining the SANFL would be a benefit I would support it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We all would.
BUT the xxxxing xxxts have not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How does that look for you? What benefits do you think are required? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
David Burtenshaw (SANFL fan and Crows GM of Comms)
I think a guarenteed 200k/year for each club would appease most if not all clubs seasonally adjusted to CPI increases for 15 years.
Oh, you can't afford that, toodle off to the ammo's then.
No other reason is required. It's not up to the SANFL clubs to find a compromise, you want to join their league.
I was wondering do you conceed the point that the SANFL clubs can say no like a 8yr old "just because"?
by Apachebulldog » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:30 am
by Pseudo » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:31 am
rod_rooster wrote:On another forum, David has posed the following in reference to a national AFL Reserves competition being put in place:
"Have you thought about the consequences of there being another competition at a level above the SANFL?"
by Tassie Blues » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:34 am
Apachebulldog wrote:Hey fellow posters it appears to me we have Crows stooges who have infiltrated our site must be getting pretty desperate i reckon.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |