by o five » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:31 pm
by areaman » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:47 pm
beenreal wrote:Since they are partners, I wonder how the SACA feels about that "we" part of the equation UK?
Or perhaps in your world they would be told to "F" off as well?
by Booney » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:48 pm
UK Fan wrote:
Yeah the SACA would hate more money................
It would almost be a 'unification that exceeds expectations.'
by beenreal » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:06 pm
UK Fan wrote:Yeah the SACA would hate more money................
It would almost be a 'unification that exceeds expectations.'
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:44 pm
by teaoby » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:46 pm
by UK Fan » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:49 pm
teaoby wrote:So let me get this straight. the Crows say all we want is a team in the league comp, the 8 SANFL teams can set the rules and reg's surrounding how, when and where. and they are the ones copping it from you lot??
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by teaoby » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:55 pm
UK Fan wrote:teaoby wrote:So let me get this straight. the Crows say all we want is a team in the league comp, the 8 SANFL teams can set the rules and reg's surrounding how, when and where. and they are the ones copping it from you lot??
Yes, you have it straight. Congrats.
by areaman » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:56 pm
teaoby wrote:So let me get this straight. the Crows say all we want is a team in the league comp, the 8 SANFL teams can set the rules and reg's surrounding how, when and where. and they are the ones copping it from you lot??
Secondly. If there is a National AFL reserves comp they Crows and Power not to mention 16 other AFL teams will rape and pillage the BEST players from the SANFL and other comp because they will then have no allegiance to us and nothing stopping them offering the likes of Suckling, Jarrad, Mecredie, Wundke and the like more $$$ and better facilities and opportunity. this way the 8 clubs get to set the guidelines of who they can use as top up players.
In a perfect world the crows and port would continue with the status quo as it seems to have worked pretty well for 20 years, but that isnt what is going to happen so how about the clubs do the best thing for the clubs and make sure they survive the next 10 years! because currently sturt and west are on their knees and others could follow if they faulter even the slightest
by tipper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:02 pm
UK Fan wrote:teaoby wrote:So let me get this straight. the Crows say all we want is a team in the league comp, the 8 SANFL teams can set the rules and reg's surrounding how, when and where. and they are the ones copping it from you lot??
Yes, you have it straight. Congrats.
by twosheds » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:09 pm
teaoby wrote:UK Fan wrote:teaoby wrote:So let me get this straight. the Crows say all we want is a team in the league comp, the 8 SANFL teams can set the rules and reg's surrounding how, when and where. and they are the ones copping it from you lot??
Yes, you have it straight. Congrats.
Each to their own.
Can i ask a direct question UK Fan. And im not trying to be a smart arse, its a genuine question.
IF they are in next year, and round 1, Centrals play Norwood at Elizabeth how does that change your enjoyment of that game? or any other game against a traditional SANFL team?
by teaoby » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:17 pm
areaman wrote:
You really think the AFL clubs will offer top up players big money to play reserves football?
Please educate us. Lay out a proper plan.
And before you start, a proper plan involves more than just telling us that the SANFL is a dying comp and we should all be grateful for a bit more attention.
by Aerie » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:18 pm
areaman wrote:You really think the AFL clubs will offer top up players big money to play reserves football?
Please educate us. Lay out a proper plan.
And before you start, a proper plan involves more than just telling us that the SANFL is a dying comp and we should all be grateful for a bit more attention.
by Aerie » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:19 pm
teaoby wrote:areaman wrote:
You really think the AFL clubs will offer top up players big money to play reserves football?
Please educate us. Lay out a proper plan.
And before you start, a proper plan involves more than just telling us that the SANFL is a dying comp and we should all be grateful for a bit more attention.
AFL clubs like Collingwood already do offer SANFL players very good money equal to what they get now, so yes i do. plus the fact that they are under the eyes of the AFL coaches and use their facilities.
Im not saying the SANFL is a dying comp, some clubs are rooted, yes. but as far as a state based comp i think it is reasonably healthy.
personally as i said i would like it to stay as is. i think the AFL guys playing for each Club adds to the comp.
I dont have an ultimate solution, there are way to many variables to be put in the pot for it to be completely clear how it will work. BUT i do think the SANFL is better off having the AFL listed players still playing in front of South Australian crowds rather then losing touch with these guys completely.
by saintal » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:44 pm
Jim05 wrote:Those two idiots on AA have got me so pissed off.
Would love to belt that knob McDermott, saying that denying the Cows entry is stupid and would be the death of the SANFL, then he goes on to say that Port need to worry about the Power and not worry about the Magpies or their 2500 members. Reckons Port cant be held back by memories and need to look after their future
by teaoby » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:46 pm
Aerie wrote:teaoby wrote:areaman wrote:
You really think the AFL clubs will offer top up players big money to play reserves football?
Please educate us. Lay out a proper plan.
And before you start, a proper plan involves more than just telling us that the SANFL is a dying comp and we should all be grateful for a bit more attention.
AFL clubs like Collingwood already do offer SANFL players very good money equal to what they get now, so yes i do. plus the fact that they are under the eyes of the AFL coaches and use their facilities.
Im not saying the SANFL is a dying comp, some clubs are rooted, yes. but as far as a state based comp i think it is reasonably healthy.
personally as i said i would like it to stay as is. i think the AFL guys playing for each Club adds to the comp.
I dont have an ultimate solution, there are way to many variables to be put in the pot for it to be completely clear how it will work. BUT i do think the SANFL is better off having the AFL listed players still playing in front of South Australian crowds rather then losing touch with these guys completely.
Which SANFL players have gone to Collingwood? Besides those drafted?
by Seaford Panther » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:48 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:54 pm
Seaford Panther wrote:How would the top-up system work anyway? If a player is contacted to play for one of the SANFL teams, it would have to be with that club's blessing that they play with an AFL reserves team. Which team would be willing to do that?
by teaoby » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:00 pm
Jim05 wrote:Seaford Panther wrote:How would the top-up system work anyway? If a player is contacted to play for one of the SANFL teams, it would have to be with that club's blessing that they play with an AFL reserves team. Which team would be willing to do that?
Exactly, id love Norwood to tell them to get stuffed they are not taking any players.
by Aerie » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:05 pm
Seaford Panther wrote:How would the top-up system work anyway? If a player is contracted to play for one of the SANFL teams, it would have to be with that club's blessing that they play with an AFL reserves team. Which team would be willing to do that?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |