beenreal wrote:As far as North Adelaide is concerned, I've already mentioned Rob Gerard but I'd like to understand how Norwood and Sturt turned things around.
Sturt Peter Alledgedly gave Sturt a 6 figure sum

by LBT » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:52 am
beenreal wrote:As far as North Adelaide is concerned, I've already mentioned Rob Gerard but I'd like to understand how Norwood and Sturt turned things around.
by beenreal » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:17 am
topsywaldron wrote:beenreal wrote:I stand by every fact I've stated, because that's exactly what they are, FACTS...Port Magpies financial woes are a direct result of not having effective access to its own revenue stream
And I'll ask again. Is the Prince of Wales solely owned by the PAMFC?
by JK » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:28 am
beenreal wrote:As far as North Adelaide is concerned, I've already mentioned Rob Gerard but I'd like to understand how Norwood and Sturt turned things around.
by topsywaldron » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:06 am
beenreal wrote:topsywaldron wrote:beenreal wrote:I stand by every fact I've stated, because that's exactly what they are, FACTS...Port Magpies financial woes are a direct result of not having effective access to its own revenue stream
And I'll ask again. Is the Prince of Wales solely owned by the PAMFC?
And I've previously stated, the PoW was the only license available which the PAMFC are currently paying off.
by beenreal » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:35 am
by LPH » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:29 pm
beenreal wrote:I stand by every fact I've stated, because that's exactly what they are, FACTS.
Port Adelaide did not want to keep a side in the SANFL but it was stipulated by the Controlling Body (SANFL)
The PAFC did not force the Magpies from Alberton, the other 8 clubs did.
Port Magpies financial woes are a direct result of not having effective access to its own revenue stream, or a generous benefactor such as Rob Gerard.
And finally, Port Adelaide did not cause the extinction of the Dinosaurs, nor is it responsible for Global Warming, or the assassination of JFK.
Anyone disputing the above needs to provide tangible evidence to the contrary.
by Lynwood » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:21 am
by Barto » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:08 am
Lynwood wrote:There are two stories here
1 our lease payments are more then we are making
2 we have paid out our lease 4 years in advance and it is trying to repay the lease quicker that ios costing us money
by jim5112 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:26 pm
beenreal wrote:I stand by every fact I've stated, because that's exactly what they are, FACTS.
Port Adelaide did not want to keep a side in the SANFL but it was stipulated by the Controlling Body (SANFL)
The PAFC did not force the Magpies from Alberton, the other 8 clubs did.
Port Magpies financial woes are a direct result of not having effective access to its own revenue stream, or a generous benefactor such as Rob Gerard.
And finally, Port Adelaide did not cause the extinction of the Dinosaurs, nor is it responsible for Global Warming, or the assassination of JFK.
Anyone disputing the above needs to provide tangible evidence to the contrary.
by Barto » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:11 pm
The Port Adelaide Football Club lodged its tender document on 14 September 1994 and addressed the below issues that impacted on the SANFL competition and the Magpies.
--- The PAFC promoted strongly the idea of promotional zones with 4 SANFL clubs attached to each of the Crows and Port Adelaide.
--- The tender document strongly supported the continuation of the Magpies in the SANFL competition.
--- As part of the tender the Outback Odyssey would be run by the AFL club.
--- There was acknowledgement that to maximise the success of the Magpies it should operate as a separate organisation to the AFL club.
--- The document encouraged and promoted cross membership packages between the Magpies and the AFL club.
--- The PAFC tender document did not support nor agree to the pre-condition of a merger to create 8 SANFL teams was fundamental to the granting of the licence.
by Barto » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:15 pm
by Hondo » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:20 pm
by Barto » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:32 pm
hondo71 wrote:barto, I think you've got to get off that Port board on BigFooty
It'll do your head in
by Hondo » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:38 pm
by Barto » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:41 pm
hondo71 wrote:I've considered joining up to TPFP actually - just to try to get another perspective
by UK Fan » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Magpiespower » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:21 am
Barto wrote:hondo71 wrote:I've considered joining up to TPFP actually - just to try to get another perspective
I hadn't read it in a long time. It's a bit different to BF, over there they've driven out all the people who still support the Magpies, at TPFP they're still tearing each other apart.
by Magpiespower » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:34 am
by Barto » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:07 pm
by Macca19 » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:23 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |