Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:55 pmheater31 wrote:stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Maybe its the Karma bus backing up??? Didn't a Glenelg bloke clean up a Sturt player and got off scott free????
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:00 pmstampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:04 pmstampy wrote:heater31 wrote:stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Maybe its the Karma bus backing up??? Didn't a Glenelg bloke clean up a Sturt player and got off scott free????
no one saw anything to implicate daniel kirk that day, whereas people saw this happen
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:06 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:12 pmsouthee wrote:stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Look forward to seeing this evidence the bays have got in their hands to suddenly come out now crying !
Maybe they will get the magnifying glass on and zoom the footage .....maybe a satellite from NASA can zoom from outer space and provide the footage !
Seriously , very sad the side down the hill have gone down this path
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:15 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:17 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:18 pmkneedeepinthehoopla wrote:southee wrote:stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Look forward to seeing this evidence the bays have got in their hands to suddenly come out now crying !
Maybe they will get the magnifying glass on and zoom the footage .....maybe a satellite from NASA can zoom from outer space and provide the footage !
Seriously , very sad the side down the hill have gone down this path
Seem to be forgetting that a footballer has suffered a concussion, behind the play no less. If this is funny or the fact that your player is probably going to get away with this low act is humourous, I don't get it.
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:23 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:25 pmheater31 wrote:kneedeepinthehoopla wrote:southee wrote:stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Look forward to seeing this evidence the bays have got in their hands to suddenly come out now crying !
Maybe they will get the magnifying glass on and zoom the footage .....maybe a satellite from NASA can zoom from outer space and provide the footage !
Seriously , very sad the side down the hill have gone down this path
Seem to be forgetting that a footballer has suffered a concussion, behind the play no less. If this is funny or the fact that your player is probably going to get away with this low act is humourous, I don't get it.
I find it more absurd that all the Glenelg fans are taking the moral high ground when one of their players did a similar thing v Sturt just a few years ago and no action taken because no one apparently saw anything
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:29 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:31 pmRB wrote:Rolfe wouldn't be the first to get away with one and won't by any means be the last...
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:38 pmkneedeepinthehoopla wrote:heater31 wrote:
I find it more absurd that all the Glenelg fans are taking the moral high ground when one of their players did a similar thing v Sturt just a few years ago and no action taken because no one apparently saw anything
He's an eagles player...
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:39 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:40 pmWedgie wrote:Tribunal has started and he's pleaded not guilty.
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:45 pmBig Phil wrote:Wedgie wrote:Tribunal has started and he's pleaded not guilty.
Peter Rolfe found NOT GUILTY - free to play against Central on Saturday...
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:48 pmPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:16 pmHow does 5 get scaled down to 2 anyway? I just saw it for the first time and it wasn't good. That's a reduction of 250% for not smacking anyone during FIVE games. Surely the judge wasn't lenient on him because he was Irish. (That would be a first.)saintal wrote:Big Phil wrote:Flynn actually got 5 weeks (over 500 points) but then with the clean record and early guilty plea, it was reduced to a 2 week ban...
A Clean record shouldnt be a factor when you've only played a handful of games. Far too generous discount.
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:20 pmBig Phil wrote:Flynn actually got 5 weeks (over 500 points) but then with the clean record and early guilty plea, it was reduced to a 2 week ban...
RB wrote:A Clean record shouldnt be a factor when you've only played a handful of games. Far too generous discount.
saintal wrote:How does 5 get scaled down to 2 anyway? I just saw it for the first time and it wasn't good. That's a reduction of 250% for not smacking anyone during FIVE games. Surely the judge wasn't lenient on him because he was Irish. (That would be a first.)
Port Adelaide defender Daniel Flynn has accepted a two-match ban for making forceful front-on contact with Eagles midfielder Chris Kane at Alberton on Sunday.
Flynn was deemed to make high, intentional contact and that the impact of the collision – which ensured Kane played no further part in the game due to concussion – was high.
Conduct - Intentional
Impact - High
Contact - High
Level 5 Forceful Front on Contact - 550 Points
Additions/Deductions
25% Deduction good Record
25% Deduction Guilty Plea
Total Points = 275
After accepting his two-match ban, Flynn will have 75 Points carried over.
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:56 pmheater31 wrote:stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
Maybe its the Karma bus backing up??? Didn't a Glenelg bloke clean up a Sturt player and got off because no one apparently saw anything