heater31 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:If we are 19k over the cap, someone is getting paid way too much!
The Recruit from South Adelaide for starters
Cocky?
by Big Phil » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:13 pm
heater31 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:If we are 19k over the cap, someone is getting paid way too much!
The Recruit from South Adelaide for starters
by Big Phil » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:25 pm
SANFL Media Release wrote:
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
TWO CLUBS CHARGED WITH SALARY CAP BREACHES
The SA Football Commission wishes to advise that two SANFL clubs have been charged with breaching the 2012 Salary Cap.
Player payment details from the West Adelaide and Port Adelaide Magpies Football Clubs were presented to the Commission today (Tuesday, November 27) by the Salary Cap Auditor for deliberation.
West Adelaide has been charged with breaching the nominated $360,000 cap by $38,319 in the 2012 season.
Port Adelaide has been charged with exceeding the cap by $19,887.
Under the SANFL’s Salary Cap regulations, each club faces a potential $50,000 fine, which is the prescribed penalty for any club recording a Salary Cap breach of between $10,000 and $50,000.
However, the SA Football Commission can impose additional penalties at its discretion.
“All clubs are fully aware of the Salary Cap regulations and know that the potential consequences of breaching the cap can be very serious,” Mr Davies said.
“Correspondence was sent to both clubs this morning and they now have 14 days to respond to the charges before an official penalty is laid.
“It is important to note that in both cases, the clubs voluntarily disclosed the information to the Commission.”
by Brodlach » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by whufc » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:34 pm
Brodlach wrote:The way people were carrying on I thought West had gone over the cap by $100,00![]()
Still not good, thats an ordinary 'accountancy" mistake.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:34 pm
by Big Phil » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:37 pm
whufc wrote:Brodlach wrote:The way people were carrying on I thought West had gone over the cap by $100,00![]()
Still not good, thats an ordinary 'accountancy" mistake.
Over $1000 a game so you could safely say the breach was worth at least one decent recruit!
Apparently the Dogs may be taking one of Ports more expensive players of them for next season!
by topsywaldron » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:44 pm
by JK » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:46 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:$50000. Can either club afford to pay that amount?
by cennals05 » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:59 pm
topsywaldron wrote:What kind of reception do you think you'll get next time you work in a media capacity at Norwood Oval BP?
I think your pushing of the 'alleged rumour' may have been noticed!
We'll see I guess.
by Brodlach » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:00 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Wedgie » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:04 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:05 pm
Brodlach wrote:How much was Norwood over when they got banned from recruiting?
Not trolling just a question
by JK » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:06 pm
Wedgie wrote:Good to see all our charity going to one club being professionally spent.
Hope they never try to run a chook raffoe down there as I honestly think it would be beyond their capacity/skills.
by Brodlach » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:07 pm
JK wrote:Brodlach wrote:How much was Norwood over when they got banned from recruiting?
Not trolling just a question
I think around the $30k mark mate .. Our problem was not apportioning one of the salaries to an off-field role, or something like that.
Either way, a breach is a breach .. All clubs can plead "it was an accident", possibly even legitimately, but your either over or under and thats all that matters.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by NO-MERCY » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:08 pm
pafc1870 wrote:If we are 19k over the cap, someone is getting paid way too much!
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:10 pm
by SDK » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:11 pm
by Brodlach » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:14 pm
JK wrote:Brodlach wrote:How much was Norwood over when they got banned from recruiting?
Not trolling just a question
I think around the $30k mark mate .. Our problem was not apportioning one of the salaries to an off-field role, or something like that.
Either way, a breach is a breach .. All clubs can plead "it was an accident", possibly even legitimately, but your either over or under and thats all that matters.
mmcmsanfl
When @NorwoodFC breached cap by $30,250 in 2008 they were fined $50k + 12 month recruiting ban. #SANFL
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Wedgie » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:14 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Squawk » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:23 pm
Brodlach wrote:the statement from the SANFL says a fine but doesnt say anything about a recruiting ban. Just wondering in relation to that. Did Norwood "own up" then?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |