by JK » Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:35 pm
by Grenville » Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:49 pm
by Gozu » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:09 pm
by blood bath » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:28 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:28 pm
JK wrote:Probably need to know specifics to know if he has a point or not. As I said elsewhere, the Hill as usual was passionate but friendly enough, I had beers with both Port and Norwood people at different occasions. We do need to be mindful of not keeping kids away from the comp if they feel threatened, and physical violence and racist or sexual taunts etc are obviously a clear no-no. But at the same time you have to question whether these ex-AFL players complaining, are doing so because they come from the more sanitised and sheltered AFL environment?
by Bounce of the ball » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:35 pm
blood bath wrote:Wasn't as though the Chad ever incited a crows crowd...
by Jim05 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:39 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:blood bath wrote:Wasn't as though the Chad ever incited a crows crowd...
Very valid comment. Maybe people just don't like him and Port. Surprising.
by Grenville » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:15 pm
by stan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:34 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:JK wrote:Probably need to know specifics to know if he has a point or not. As I said elsewhere, the Hill as usual was passionate but friendly enough, I had beers with both Port and Norwood people at different occasions. We do need to be mindful of not keeping kids away from the comp if they feel threatened, and physical violence and racist or sexual taunts etc are obviously a clear no-no. But at the same time you have to question whether these ex-AFL players complaining, are doing so because they come from the more sanitised and sheltered AFL environment?
Good comment. I have been to games where Norwood played and some of their supporters were aggressive and embarrassing. It even involved more mature woman walking back to the car. I never witnessed or experienced a hostile Norwood crowd until Bassett took over ? Is there something in that ?
On the other side is Cornes a bit precious as well. What it displays is the angst with the AFL reserves inclusion not the Port/ Norwood rilvary and that is exactly why Younie has been quoted.
by locky801 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:41 pm
by Pseudo » Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:11 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:PORT Adelaide and Adelaide have called for greater security at SANFL matches after Chad Cornes labelled the crowd at Norwood Oval last week as “probably the most abusive I’ve ever been involved with either at AFL or SANFL level’’.
Crows SANFL coach Heath Younie backed Cornes’s call for greater safety measures for players and coaches and revealed Adelaide employs its own plain-clothes security guards to deal with crowd trouble “just in case something happens’’.
by Rik E Boy » Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:19 pm
by Booney » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:44 am
by Dogwatcher » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:52 am
by Wedgie » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:53 am
Booney wrote:Shows the intelligence of people, on here and at the footy, if I abuse shit out of the players and coach enough they'll leave. Dead set **** head if that's your preferred method of stating your case and shows you've not got the intellect to approach the situation in any manner to make a real difference.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:55 am
tigerpie wrote:Bit rich coming from port I would've thought. Do they hear their own ferals at alberton?
by Booney » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:57 am
Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Shows the intelligence of people, on here and at the footy, if I abuse shit out of the players and coach enough they'll leave. Dead set **** head if that's your preferred method of stating your case and shows you've not got the intellect to approach the situation in any manner to make a real difference.
So if you abuse people you're a dead set **** head?![]()
I assume this is an April Fools post?
by Wedgie » Fri Apr 01, 2016 9:01 am
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Shows the intelligence of people, on here and at the footy, if I abuse shit out of the players and coach enough they'll leave. Dead set **** head if that's your preferred method of stating your case and shows you've not got the intellect to approach the situation in any manner to make a real difference.
So if you abuse people you're a dead set **** head?![]()
I assume this is an April Fools post?
Might need to read it again, if you think abusing people is the way to fix the reserves issue then yes, you are, how can it help any efforts to return the SANFL to what it was?
All it will do is give more people reason not to attend.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Fri Apr 01, 2016 9:04 am
Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Shows the intelligence of people, on here and at the footy, if I abuse shit out of the players and coach enough they'll leave. Dead set **** head if that's your preferred method of stating your case and shows you've not got the intellect to approach the situation in any manner to make a real difference.
So if you abuse people you're a dead set **** head?![]()
I assume this is an April Fools post?
Might need to read it again, if you think abusing people is the way to fix the reserves issue then yes, you are, how can it help any efforts to return the SANFL to what it was?
All it will do is give more people reason not to attend.
Apologies, I thought you were taking the piss by abusing people for abusing people.
by tipper » Fri Apr 01, 2016 9:18 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |