by Gozu » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:40 pm
by Spargo » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:32 pm
by heater31 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:37 pm
Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
by bloods08 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:08 pm
Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
by blueandwhite » Mon Jun 16, 2014 4:53 pm
bloods08 wrote:Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
Got off. Vision was inconclusive IMO.
Alleway got 3.
by southee » Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:08 pm
bloods08 wrote:Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
Got off. Vision was inconclusive IMO.
Alleway got 3.
by Spargo » Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:48 pm
blueandwhite wrote:bloods08 wrote:Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
Got off. Vision was inconclusive IMO.
Alleway got 3.
..sniping prick..
by dedja » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:05 pm
southee wrote:bloods08 wrote:Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
Got off. Vision was inconclusive IMO.
Alleway got 3.
Justice prevails !
by blueandwhite » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:16 pm
Spargo wrote:blueandwhite wrote:bloods08 wrote:Spargo wrote:Rolfe allegedly heard to be laughing/bragging post match about his gutless hit on Joseph 50m behind play.
Just hope there is footage of it so the sniping prick can go for at least 6 weeks.
Got off. Vision was inconclusive IMO.
Alleway got 3.
..sniping prick..
Nothing "cool" about it blueandwhite. That response surprises me from you.
Did you see the incident?
by maxyoz » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:55 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
by saintal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:59 pm
maxyoz wrote:Alleway was an idiot, no denying that, but how can Rolfe not get questioned?
by maxyoz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:11 am
Wedgie wrote:The vision doesnt show anything conclusively IMHO.
That's probably why he got off, umpire didn't see it and video shows stuff all.
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
by Wedgie » Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:21 am
maxyoz wrote:Wedgie wrote:The vision doesnt show anything conclusively IMHO.
That's probably why he got off, umpire didn't see it and video shows stuff all.
Fair enough. I would suggest, looking at the slow-mo, that Rolfe should have at least been questioned.
Durdin knew the hit was coming from Alleway, in fact, he went to him - just lost. Aaron Joseph had no idea what was coming, fair way off the ball, was lifted off the ground, nobody else around apart from a flying Peter Rolfe landing back on his feet winding the wing back in - didn't know he was an F1-11, but there you go. Purely an assumption that Aaron Joseph got hit, I guess.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by maxyoz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:04 am
"The SANFL Tribunal will sit on Tuesday night to hear an incident involving South Adelaide’s Peter Rolfe and Glenelg’s Aaron Joseph from Sunday’s game at Gliderol Stadium.
Joseph, who had to be stretchered from the field after the fourth-quarter incident, was diagnosed with concussion and took no further part in the match.
There was no conclusive vision of the incident, however, based on the evidence submitted by the Glenelg Football Club, the matter has been referred to the SANFL Tribunal for a hearing at 5.45pm on Tuesday."
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
by maxyoz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:10 am
Wedgie wrote:Probably frustrated at being in such a shit side.
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
by BRaG » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:16 am
by heater31 » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:21 am
BRaG wrote:Did anyone notice at the game the quality of the turf? Apparently the contractor who looks after the complex had a mishap with their chemical spraying and have sprayed out round up instead of a fungicide or fertiliser. I believe they sprayed out a good portion of the oval before they realised their error.
by MatteeG » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:27 am
BRaG wrote:Did anyone notice at the game the quality of the turf? Apparently the contractor who looks after the complex had a mishap with their chemical spraying and have sprayed out round up instead of a fungicide or fertiliser. I believe they sprayed out a good portion of the oval before they realised their error.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by blueandwhite » Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:39 pm
by Booney » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |