Umpire accountability?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby MightyEagles » Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:49 am

LEH wrote:Umpires have an 'Umpires Observer' @ every match.
They 'Grade' the performances of all the Umpires on the ground & feedback during the week @ training.
If an Umpire is not given an 'A' Grading, they are automatically 'dropped' to a lower level the following week.

Personally, I think umpires should umpire in the same 'teams' EVERY week.
That way they will know each others interpretations, movements, etc. - this would be more conducive to consistency that is desired.

One of the problems with our game is the "interpretation" open to individuals.
If they were in the same 'team' every week, at least these interpretations could be consistently applied in each game they officiate together.


You mean keep the umpires in the same group and not change them every week.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:59 pm

am Bays wrote:
Jimmy wrote:With improved fitness there should only be 2 umpires...hell even trial going back to one.


Yeah because the increase in fitness hasn't made the players faster..... :roll: :roll:

Actually you can possibly blame Jack Oatey for the two adn three umprie system. With the handball quick movement game he intitalted in the 50-60s is arguably the catalyst for the running game we see today (the Victorians claim Len Smith but we South Australians know better).

So the speeding up of the game compared to the "kick to contest" type game of earlier times necessitated the need for a 2nd umpire then a third.

So blame Jack for the number of umpres we have now!!!


and yet the 3rd umpire is supposed to watch behind the play, but they are often ball watching
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60954
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13440 times
Been liked: 4644 times

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby TimmiesChin » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:03 pm

OxCamBlues wrote:Two games in two days where a questionable holding the ball decision has influenced the outcome. What will the consequences be for the umpires and decisions in question? Will the umpires boss continue to shrug it off as part and parcel of the game?

Discuss.....


Can only hope that the integrity of the competition isn't being damaged by the umpires....
TimmiesChin
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:22 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby gossipgirl » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:27 pm

TimmiesChin wrote:
OxCamBlues wrote:Two games in two days where a questionable holding the ball decision has influenced the outcome. What will the consequences be for the umpires and decisions in question? Will the umpires boss continue to shrug it off as part and parcel of the game?

Discuss.....


Can only hope that the integrity of the competition isn't being damaged by the umpires....



I think the carbon tax is ruining the integrity as well :shock:
Adelaide Crows World champions 2017 - Crows 4.11 to Lions 4.5
gossipgirl
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Looking for all the Boats
Has liked: 1538 times
Been liked: 57 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby The analyst » Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:47 pm

If your looking for teams who get a nice ride from the umpires then check out South Adelaide's frees for v frees against differential this season.............................and again on Saturday !!!
The analyst
Mini-League
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:05 pm
Location: With the stats sheets
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 7 times

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby Wedgie » Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:59 pm

The analyst wrote:If your looking for teams who get a nice ride from the umpires then check out South Adelaide's frees for v frees against differential this season.............................and again on Saturday !!!

They're still comfortably behind Port.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby Wedgie » Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:02 pm

I was told I shouldn't comment about umpiring on Saturday night because my team won, I was told I shouldn't comment about umpiring on Sunday as my team lost. I hope everyone that comments on this topic had a draw on the weekend. That must be the rule according to the wank police.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Umpire accountability?

Postby Mark_Beswick » Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:11 pm

First time in over 2 months we drew level or had more frees.... And we lost....
The week before we won by 75 points with 8 less frees BUT I thought the umpiring was OK.

I wish we could blame the umps for losing on the weekend at Richmond but alas they had no impact on us losing.
Mark_Beswick
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Lockleys
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 13 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 13 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |