by HOORAY PUNT » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:07 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:14 pm
topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:WE HAVE FOUND A KEY FORWARD!!!!!!!
So you've stopped hoping the Crows drop Henderson I'm guessing.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:16 pm
whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:WE HAVE FOUND A KEY FORWARD!!!!!!!
So you've stopped hoping the Crows drop Henderson I'm guessing.
LOL coming from a supporter who goes for a club who has relied on Taylor Walker for X amount of years.
Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:20 pm
by JK » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:21 pm
whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:WE HAVE FOUND A KEY FORWARD!!!!!!!
So you've stopped hoping the Crows drop Henderson I'm guessing.
LOL coming from a supporter who goes for a club who has relied on Taylor Walker for X amount of years.
Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
by on the rails » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:21 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:25 pm
on the rails wrote:Centrals do it again - uncover a gem! That Marshall (correct my spelling) is a very good prospect long term if the AFL seagulls don't swoop first. A Very impressive performance and looked liked he was a seasoned player
by HOORAY PUNT » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:26 pm
whufc wrote:still no word on who the not so young ruckmen no one had seen before who played no trial games wearing another players number playing reserves was?
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:28 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:35 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:whufc wrote:still no word on who the not so young ruckmen no one had seen before who played no trial games wearing another players number playing reserves was?
Why not just tell us then if you know ? Sounds desperate .
by topsywaldron » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:47 pm
whufc wrote:Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:48 pm
topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
Well done on being equal on points with West and South. The battle for fifth is shaping up to be very exciting.
by whufc » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:49 pm
by topsywaldron » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:57 pm
whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
Well done on being equal on points with West and South. The battle for fifth is shaping up to be very exciting.
If Norwood and the Bays are in the finals being 5th is as good as having the double chance.
by am Bays » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:59 pm
whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
Well done on being equal on points with West and South. The battle for fifth is shaping up to be very exciting.
If Norwood and the Bays are in the finals being 5th is as good as having the double chance.
by whufc » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:00 am
topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:Oh oh Norwoods bum holes will be twitching now the Dogs are on the board.
Well done on being equal on points with West and South. The battle for fifth is shaping up to be very exciting.
If Norwood and the Bays are in the finals being 5th is as good as having the double chance.
You beat South and carry on like this? Nice one.
by topsywaldron » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:05 am
by HOORAY PUNT » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:08 am
whufc wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:whufc wrote:still no word on who the not so young ruckmen no one had seen before who played no trial games wearing another players number playing reserves was?
Why not just tell us then if you know ? Sounds desperate .
I honestly dont know who he was........................no one did, he looked to old to be a under 18 player.
Then after the game he was getting around in slacks and just a casual dress top, no Central offical gear on. I didnt hang around long enough to bother asking anyone. Looked promising except seemed to lack a bit of fitness.
TSG- Marschalls disposal today wasnt great, a couple of crucial blunders early but has been brilliant the first two games of the year and generally uses it very well. His kick outs today were top shelf though.
by whufc » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:10 am
topsywaldron wrote:Just think, if Spurr's kicked had bounced six inches the other way you'd reigning premiers.
As it happened it didn't and your mob achieved exactly the same as my lot did last year, jacksh*t.
by topsywaldron » Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:17 am
whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Just think, if Spurr's kicked had bounced six inches the other way you'd reigning premiers.
As it happened it didn't and your mob achieved exactly the same as my lot did last year, jacksh*t.
No we achieved to break the record for most consecutive GF's in the HISTORY of the SANFL.
Your team really did acheive nothing zero, zilch and your only enjoyment for the year was watching a side that you dont even support, thats pretty sad dude.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |