Rd 20 Eagles v Bays Review

[stampy]

cant argue with that

[dedja]

Can't disagree with that ... Although what does that say about the sides that are 5th-9th?

[southee]

and the boards at unley and prospect havent made bad decisions re coaches at all?? **** off back to your own teams threads willya!!

Ouch !!! ....but it is ok for bay supporters to give opinions and have a dig at other teams coaching decisions ???

Eg. South , sturt , north , west ???

[mighty_tiger_79]

Glenelg would have to be the worst 4th side ever, surely?
Bugger the top 5 or 4, should only be a top 3 this year.

and the premiership race is seriously only between 2 this year, centrals v norwood, i reckon

apart from the eagles the other teams arent much good

[on the rails]

Well Stampy the fact Glenelg sacked a coach with the team sitting in a finals spot was probably the duimbest decision in SANFL history. All Boards make good and bad but Glenelg win the Gong. The best decision the Bays could make is to get rid of the meglomaniac President!

[locky801]

and the boards at unley and prospect havent made bad decisions re coaches at all?? **** off back to your own teams threads willya!!

Obviously a very touchy subject most boards have made stupid decisions over coaches now and again but your club seems to do it regularly. Heading back to my own teams thread now

[HOORAY PUNT]

and the boards at unley and prospect havent made bad decisions re coaches at all?? **** off back to your own teams threads willya!!

Can you actually handle anything mate without simply abusing people .Of course Sturt have made bad Board decisions no one is saying they haven't but the comments were not made about Sturt or North they were made about Glenelg and your Board looks quite silly as of tonight.

All clubs have poor supporters but thank god you don't follow Sturt , you're embarassing.

[Dutchy]

Please keep this thread on topic, if you want to discuss something else start a new thread. This is for the review of a game.

Thanks


Terrible game to half time, Eagles would have been dissappointed not to be more ahead. Their skills were poor but still 7 goals up. Once their skills got better in the last 1/4 floodgates opened.

Am I right that there wasnt a goal scored in the 3rd quarter?

Bays in deep trouble, only positive is kids are getting games now and they do show a bit.

Apart from the result a good day at the footy, my little fella loved the kids activities, well done to the WWTFC and Phil Herden

[Brodlach]

Please keep this thread on topic, if you want to discuss something else start a new thread. This is for the review of a game.

Thanks


Terrible game to half time, Eagles would have been dissappointed not to be more ahead. Their skills were poor but still 7 goals up. Once their skills got better in the last 1/4 floodgates opened.

Am I right that there wasnt a goal scored in the 3rd quarter?

Bays in deep trouble, only positive is kids are getting games now and they do show a bit.

Apart from the result a good day at the footy, my little fella loved the kids activities, well done to the WWTFC and Phil Herden

Eagles 1.6 to the Bays 0.1

[Pseudo]

Insipid would be the kindest word to describe the Bays. Probably one of the worst efforts I can recall seeing at SANFL level.
Eagles weren't that good, play like that and we would have been done by 7-10 goals by Centrals and Norwood.

Spot on.

[Brodlach]

I know he got 40 touches but how Cornes go? Were they mostly crap possessions or were they quality possessions?

[bayman]

i thought as i said in the preview that we'd get smashed, however i was thinking of between 8-10 goals not 107 points......the last time i saw a glenelg team not give a yelp was on june 18th round 12 2011 & the coach got the sack, so what will happen this time ? surely we couldn't have 3 coaches in a year ?, very hard training, even longer team meetings isn't doing the trick, the fact is there is a huge gap between 3rd & 4th (we should be about 7th), massie as coach i'm not sure about because how you leave mckenzie (the best player in the comp) allowed to run around like an unregistered dog is beyond me among other wwt players, wwt were that dominate it looked like it was 30 players against 18 as they were prepared to work harder a lot harder than glenelg, i thought cornes started well while curran, panozzo, kennedy, cranston & even sellar (who had 4 kicked on him) bobbed up & seem to battle harder than the rest of them, as for wwt well simply put all players did their bit in the old 'all played well'

most people think it is a two horse race for the flag well i think it is a three horse race & i definately think wwt can go top, as for us well we'll limp into an elimination final & then see the mothballs....i feel for DAMHARD who drove nearly 8 hours from home to see that inept display by us

the glenelg board do have a few questions to answer given the facts we know

[Pseudo]

second best result. ever.

^

best festivus grievance. ever.

[bayman]

I know he got 40 touches but how Cornes go? Were they mostly crap possessions or were they quality possessions?

had a good first 10 minutes but 'hardly sighted or damaging' after that

[The Sleeping Giant]

Surely there were plenty of witnesses to today's incident at Oval Ave?

[topcat10]

That "incident" lasted 120 minutes- and plenty were there to witness it AND the WHOLE incident was caught on camera.Will the SANFL launch an investigation

[The Sleeping Giant]

I was gonna say the Bays getting raped. Well done topcat.

[Pseudo]

I was gonna say the Bays getting raped. Well done topcat.

The Bays weren't raped. They were utterly complicit, insofar as none of 'em offered any resistance.

[dedja]

Hang on ... who said it wasn't consensual?

[fish]

A huge win for the Eagles and it may well kickstart their run to the finals...