Rd 12 Norwood v Panthers post game chat

[Adelaide Hawk]

If I was a Norwood supporter, I wouldn't be to bothered by the umpires, your first 3 goals came from free kicks, one of them was a definite, the other two were a bit on the dubious side.

Nowhere in my post did I say anything about who was favoured. My post said that the umpiring was bloody pathetic, and I meant it. You can read into it what you like.

[SDK]

When the two reports on Eagleton are thrown out how are we compensated for his being sent off ?
That piece of crap who reported him the second time should never be allowed to umpire again. To send off a player of that quality over many years is a disgrace and Nathan was obviously upset by his treatment.
We need to go back to two umpires because we can not find 27 field umpires of League quality each week and never ever will.
ALL umpires should have played the game for a minimum of 5 years before they are permitted to umpire at SANFL level. They have no idea of the spirit of the game and you can never have that unless you have played the game.
If we are short of umpires then just use one !!!!!!!!
I am sick to death of having my afternoon/night at the football ruined by gutless whimps.

[CENTURION]

If I was a Norwood supporter, I wouldn't be to bothered by the umpires, your first 3 goals came from free kicks, one of them was a definite, the other two were a bit on the dubious side.

Nowhere in my post did I say anything about who was favoured. My post said that the umpiring was bloody pathetic, and I meant it. You can read into it what you like.

Hey, AH, did pp say anyone was favoured? He just stated that your first 3 goals came from free kicks, chill out.

[JAS]

Did anyone by any chance stay on for the U18's game??

Looking for a final score please.

Regards
JAS

[SDK]

I left at 3/4 time and the score was :

Norwood 17. 8
South 0.1

No I am NOT joking !

[JAS]

I left at 3/4 time and the score was :

Norwood 17. 8
South 0.1

No I am NOT joking !

wow thanks...guess we might have got yet another clean sweep then. I'll keep hunting.

Regards
JAS

[CENTURION]

When the two reports on Eagleton are thrown out how are we compensated for his being sent off ?
That piece of crap who reported him the second time should never be allowed to umpire again. To send off a player of that quality over many years is a disgrace and Nathan was obviously upset by his treatment.
We need to go back to two umpires because we can not find 27 field umpires of League quality each week and never ever will.
ALL umpires should have played the game for a minimum of 5 years before they are permitted to umpire at SANFL level. They have no idea of the spirit of the game and you can never have that unless you have played the game.
If we are short of umpires then just use one !!!!!!!!
I am sick to death of having my afternoon/night at the football ruined by gutless whimps.

COMPENSATED? Does ANYONE get compensated when a player is reported? That is a dumb question!! Who gives a frigging tinker's cuss about the "quality" of your player! What makes a player of 1 game any better than a player of 500 games, when it comes to being reprimanded? HE SHOULD KNOW BETTER!! 27 Umpires each week? 3 per game, 4 games, hmmmmm.......

[The Sleeping Giant]

3 wins and a player sent off.......against South. Well done Norwood.

[topsywaldron]

3 wins and a player sent off.......against South. Well done Norwood.

North must have lost again.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Norwood must of won.

[topsywaldron]

COMPENSATED? Does ANYONE get compensated when a player is reported? That is a dumb question!! .....

It's not actually. If Eagleton is found not guilty of one of the charges it's pretty straightforward - he shouldn't have been sent off.

[JAS]

The Tiser site has their game review up now including Bass' comments on Eagleton's sending off...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6077678911

Regards
JAS

[CENTURION]

COMPENSATED? Does ANYONE get compensated when a player is reported? That is a dumb question!! .....

It's not actually. If Eagleton is found not guilty of one of the charges it's pretty straightforward - he shouldn't have been sent off.

Actually, it IS! If ANY player is reported, his side is immediately penalised straight away, whether he is sent off or not. What if a player is reported, 50 metre penalty is imposed, opposition player kicks a goal & side wins! THEN during the week, player is found not guilty!

[CENTURION]

Didn't your mob win by enough?? FFS!!

[The Sleeping Giant]

Wouldn't have been a problem if Eagleton didn't get reported the first time.

[Jim05]

I left at 3/4 time and the score was :

Norwood 17. 8
South 0.1

No I am NOT joking !

Geez i left just before 1/2 time and a massacre was on the cards. Great result for club and good to see all sides in the mix for finals.

[topsywaldron]

Actually, it IS! If ANY player is reported, his side is immediately penalised straight away, whether he is sent off or not. What if a player is reported, 50 metre penalty is imposed, opposition player kicks a goal & side wins! THEN during the week, player is found not guilty!

Bunkum.

One fifty metre penalty is slightly different to losing a perfectly fit player and a third of your interchange for more than half a game.

[NFC]

One of the worst standard of umpiring I've ever seen, for both sides. Just absolutely sickening. STOP RUINING THE GAME!!

[staritski]

When the two reports on Eagleton are thrown out how are we compensated for his being sent off ?
That piece of crap who reported him the second time should never be allowed to umpire again. To send off a player of that quality over many years is a disgrace and Nathan was obviously upset by his treatment.
We need to go back to two umpires because we can not find 27 field umpires of League quality each week and never ever will.
ALL umpires should have played the game for a minimum of 5 years before they are permitted to umpire at SANFL level. They have no idea of the spirit of the game and you can never have that unless you have played the game.
If we are short of umpires then just use one !!!!!!!!
I am sick to death of having my afternoon/night at the football ruined by gutless whimps.

COMPENSATED? Does ANYONE get compensated when a player is reported? That is a dumb question!! Who gives a frigging tinker's cuss about the "quality" of your player! What makes a player of 1 game any better than a player of 500 games, when it comes to being reprimanded? HE SHOULD KNOW BETTER!! 27 Umpires each week? 3 per game, 4 games, hmmmmm.......

Umm seriously pal, stick to your own thread and chill for a while will you?

[CENTURION]

This IS my thread, it's a public forum about The SANFL, of which I am passionate about. My opinion is just as valid and regarded as yours. Now I am going to have a bowl of Golden North Vanilla Ice Cream.............but I will be back.