Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Apachebulldog » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:55 pm

I guess most SANFL are worried that somehow the AFL will eventually destroy this great league they have destroyed the WAFL and VFL
The AFL could of been the best football in the land however with the yearly tampering of the rules it is turning a lot of people off sure they might have the best footballers in the land why the almighty dollar and anyhow these great players are now playing in an oversanitised product for the TV masses thats why a lot of people are returning to their grass roots SANFL.

Yes Whiteline fever i have seen the big picture the slow destruction of all state leagues by the AFL over the last 20 odd years.

SANFL = REAL FOOTY
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby whufc » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:56 pm

That would be another one!

The AFL informing the SANFL its not in their best interest to market the comp as REAL FOOTY!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28771
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2851 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby once_were_warriors » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:57 pm

My biggest concern is the implementation of reserve sides for the power and crows into the SANFL competition.

Would simply cheapen the competition too have two teams running around whose priorities are not the SANFL premiership.

In regards to licence ownership and stadium revenue , I say let the power and crows have their licences and reap the benefits or non benefits of being independent.

I think the SANFL have played their cards extremely well over the last three years.

They will:

1. Have half ownership in the running of Adelaide Oval- at no cost.
2. Have an asset in football park land that can really set up the future for the SANFL.
3. Licences will be bought out at market value , or guaranteed funding from the AFL.

It really is time to cash the chips in. It can't get much better financially for the SANFL.
The down turn in attendances of our two AFL clubs will continue regardless of the relocation to Adelaide Oval.
The AFL competition lives on TV revenue and with that comes the live against the gate broadcasts for all games.
People will take the easy option of staying home and put further pressure on stadium revenues.
With the SANFL being co owners in Adelaide Oval which will have sporting and non sporting events all year round , the SANFL financial exposure is greatly reduced as it will not have to solely rely on 22 AFL events a year.
If at first you don't succeed , then destroy all evidence that you tried in the first place
once_were_warriors
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: under Scoreboard Woody Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Booney » Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:25 pm

Why not have the Power and Crows reserves team play in the SANFL reserves comp and not the league?

Power align their reserves with the Magpies, Crows form their own and both sides use U18's as fillers.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61743
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8218 times
Been liked: 11948 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby CUTTERMAN » Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:35 pm

Crows have already ruled that out via Trigg. Re your comment about the U18's, so the SANFL clubs develop their zones and juniors and then Crows and Port pick who they want? Hmmmmm, let me think....NO
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Booney » Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:59 pm

Yep, those two lines I wrote is the absolute total manner in which I would implement the system.

Let me think....NO. :roll:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61743
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8218 times
Been liked: 11948 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby once_were_warriors » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:10 pm

It has to be a clean break.
If the power and crows want true independence then they will have to find other avenues for their reserves sides.
I would suggest the VFL would be the likely league.
Either form an alliance like other AFL sides or perhaps top up their lists with players from the Vic metro leagues.

Adelaide AFL clubs independent , SANFL clubs independent.

If you take the benefits of independence then you need to be truly independent.
If at first you don't succeed , then destroy all evidence that you tried in the first place
once_were_warriors
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: under Scoreboard Woody Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Country Cousin » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:20 pm

This is a summary of the way the league structures in Victoria (Which had stood for over a century) have been torn apart since the advent of the AFL in 1996. Football as a suburban game is effectively dead there now. Nothing else matters but what meets the immediate needs of the AFL and its multi billion dollar promotional deals. If you want this sort of thing to happen in South Australia, just let them have their way.

1996 - The VFA changes its name to Victorian Football League, VFL, now that the old VFL is now the AFL. The Preston Bullants become known as the Preston Knights, changing their colours from red and white to white, blue and black. North Ballarat Roosters and the Traralgon Maroons enter the VFL.

1998 - Bendigo Diggers enter the VFL. Traralgon Maroons leave the VFL.

1999 - Coburg Lions become Coburg-Fitzroy Lions.

2000 - The VFL becomes strongly aligned with the AFL, and reserve players from AFL teams were now able to play with the VFL if their team was aligned with an existing VFL team. The initial alignments were: Box Hill with Hawthorn, Port Melbourne with Sydney, Werribee with the Western Bulldogs, Sandringham with Melbourne. Carlton Blues, Collingwood Magpies, Essendon Bombers, Kangaroos, Geelong Cats, Richmond Tigers and St Kilda Saints all entered VFL 'Reserves' teams. Box Hill Mustangs become Box Hill Hawks, but retain the mustang image on their guernsey. The Preston Knights revert to the name Preston Bullants, and revert to their old colours.

2001 - Coburg align with Richmond, Springvale align with St Kilda, Williamstown align with Collingwood, all of whose reserve grade teams drop out. The Kangaroos align with a new team to form the Murray Kangaroos. Tasmania Devils enter the VFL. Coburg-Fitzroy Lions become Coburg Tigers

2003 - The Bullants align with Carlton and Bendigo align with Essendon, both of whose reserves teams drop out. Port Melbourne and Sydney dis-align and the Kangaroos align in Sydney's place, ending the short career of the Murray Kangaroos. Bendigo Diggers become Bendigo Bombers.

2006 - Port Melbourne end their affiliation with the Kangaroos. Port Melbourne exists as a stand alone team, while the Kangaroos become aligned with North Ballarat and Tasmania, with half of their reserve players fed into each club. The Scorpions move to Cranbourne and become the Casey Scorpions; the club retains the name "Springvale Football Club."

2008 - The Western Bulldogs and Collingwood end their affiliations with Werribee and Williamstown respectively. The Western Bulldogs align with Williamstown in Collingwood's place. North Melbourne ends its partial affiliation with Tasmania, and partially affiliates with Werribee, retaining its partial affiliation with North Ballarat. Collingwood re-enters its 'reserves' team into the VFL.

2009 - St Kilda ends its affiliation with Casey, and becomes affiliated with Sandringham, and Melbourne ends its affiliation with Sandringham and becomes affiliated with Casey. Tasmania Devils leave the league.

2010 - The Gold Coast Football Club, who became known as the Gold Coast Suns during mid-season join the VFL. This was planned as a one-year stint in the VFL before the club played its inaugural season in the AFL in 2011.

2011 - The Gold Coast Suns leave the VFL to join the AFL.
Country Cousin
Member
 
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:30 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Harry the Horse » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:31 pm

Had forgotten some of those teams. What an absolute circus. Reminds you of footy leagues in the 1870s ... Bankers, Victorian, Medindie etc.
Breaks your heart.
2012 - Having been deflowered for more than a decade, the empty carcass that is the VFL finally disappears up its own ar*e when the last two remaining stand alone clubs, Port Melbourne and Frankston, declare they've had a gutful and go and join the amateurs.
User avatar
Harry the Horse
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:13 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby saintal » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:43 pm

A good history lesson there. A shambles and mockery of a comp with the traditions/histories of all clubs being forever stymied.

I seem to recall that when Richmond aligned with Coburg they made the club ditch the recently established Fitzroy connection.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5821
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 464 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby CUTTERMAN » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:55 pm

What an utter utter joke! This corporate madness is just what we need to avoid. There's no care for anyones history, traditions, nothing! It's all about which AFL club can get what, from who, when they need it. Buyer be ware!
Thanks CC, great info!
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Dissident » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:58 pm

I would argue that the Victorian "suburban" game turned into the AFL, rather than the AFL being created from nothing. The VFL was torn apart and turned into the AFL - the VFA wasn't the VFL.

In saying that, I'm not downplaying the carnage.
I love 'Food and Stuff'. It's where I buy all of my food. And most of my stuff.
User avatar
Dissident
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 6394
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:55 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby sjt » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:02 pm

Great post CC, it contains a heavy dose of perspective. Whose on first? It's definitely how to make a joke of a competition (in an unfunny way). It reveals, the AFL concern that must be present for "second tier" competitions.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby redandblack » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:09 pm

I think Dissident's post sums it up.

This thread seems to be going the same way as most similar ones, so it would be nice to have some more facts about what the AFL is doing/has done to the SANFL.
redandblack
 

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Mr Beefy » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:14 pm

My apologies R&B but I didn't want to waste this message I just spent 5 minutes typing...

There was more carnage than just that, clubs like Prahran, Oakleigh, Mordialloc, and others fell be the wayside or joined lesser leagues. Yarraville ? might be another one but there were 2 divisions of the VFA. Similar to some SAFA clubs, a lot of them were going broke and some also had no juniors coming through due to urban sprawl, etc.
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5158
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 412 times
Been liked: 681 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Pseudo » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:21 pm

redandblack wrote:... it would be nice to have some more facts about what the AFL is doing/has done to the SANFL.

Better to have some idea about what the AFL is likely to do to the SANFL. Looking forwards instead of backwards, except insofar as one might extrapolate forwards from what has already come to pass. Just sayin'.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby redandblack » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:28 pm

No worries, Mr Beefy, I wasn't referring to the VFA discussion.

Pseudo, that tells us nothing. Here's yet another opportunity for you to say exactly how the AFL have dudded the SANFL.

For such a powerful body, which IMO could do some real damage to the SANFL if they really wanted to, they seem to have done bugger-all except for a bit of tinkering around the edges.

Tell me what they've actually done, instead of 'just sayin'".

I'm interested.
redandblack
 

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Booney » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:30 pm

Pseudo wrote:
redandblack wrote:... it would be nice to have some more facts about what the AFL is doing/has done to the SANFL.

Better to have some idea about what the AFL is likely to do to the SANFL.


Forecasting, predicting if you will, the future actions of others?

Fame, fortune and instant admiration will flood your way if succesful. ;)
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61743
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8218 times
Been liked: 11948 times

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby Go Legs » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:36 pm

redandblack wrote:Cutterman, what evidence do you have that the AFL is undermining the SANFL?


My distrust of the AFL goes back to when the AFL were very happy to accept Port Adelaide for the initial licence
and were VERY supportive behind the scenes to get it across the line, basically in order to undermine the horse
trading going on with the SANFL and to guarantee National TV rights to the winner of the tender.

The AFL have always been supportative of the Power, who is driving the Adelaide Oval issue not the SANFL or the Crows

The AFL have done nothing over the years to ease my mind about trust, therefore Hands off our SANFL

Cheers,.
User avatar
Go Legs
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Hands off the SANFL - In what way?

Postby JK » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:51 pm

redandblack wrote:No worries, Mr Beefy, I wasn't referring to the VFA discussion.

Pseudo, that tells us nothing. Here's yet another opportunity for you to say exactly how the AFL have dudded the SANFL.

For such a powerful body, which IMO could do some real damage to the SANFL if they really wanted to, they seem to have done bugger-all except for a bit of tinkering around the edges.

Tell me what they've actually done, instead of 'just sayin'".

I'm interested.


As far as I can make out, this whole "Hands Off" campaign came about initially as a result of Port becoming an unviable option as of today and going forward.

The SANFL then claimed they had no further borrowing power, and effectively lobbied the AFL to financially back them until such time as they could get back on their feet.

The old sayings "Noone does nothing for nothing" and "business is business" are probably never truer than when it comes to the AFL .. Therefore, naturally lovers of the SANFL became quite fearful of what "conditions" the AFL would look to impose on the SANFL and it's league.

Around the same time, the push for AFL Reserves teams in the SANFL and WAFL were becoming well publicised.

I think this "Hands Off" campaign was established and has grown, not necessarily as a result of what the AFL has done, but for fear of what it might try to impose and thus it's intention was to make it clear to the SANFL trustees that people do care about our competition and don't want it further bastardised that it has been.

I don't always agree with methods, thoughts or comments, but I love the passion people show toward our competition and clubs, regardless of which club they support.

Previously, I think we have seen the AFL influence result in cut funding for grassroots development, reduction in transfer fee's to feeder clubs and increases in the base transfer rate among non-AFL clubs.

There is a reason people fear the AFL .. As with any corporation they are always looking to increase their market share and turnover, regardless of who they may be taking it from.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |