by csbowes » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:21 pm
by CENTURION » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:22 pm
csbowes wrote:CENTURION wrote:The Wiggles slight faves ATM, Central just behind, lost McKenzie & Schell but have scored Obst, Slattery, Nash fulltime, O'Sullivan is back, Milne is ready, Evil is training the house down & WILL play, Hynes will kick at least 60 goals at Full Forward PLUS a host of guns from the reserves who have been overly patient!
orCENTURION wrote:incredibly predictable? We only won the Grand Final last year by 1 goal & most people don't think We have a chance this year!
and yet your 1st or 2nd favourite for the flag?
Which one is it mate?
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:28 pm
by smithy » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:35 pm
Blacky wrote:well footy is a funny game might put 100 on westies
why not
by csbowes » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:39 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Norwood had their chance last year & chokeddon't think they'll get a 2nd chance.
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 10, 2011 10:02 pm
csbowes wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Norwood had their chance last year & chokeddon't think they'll get a 2nd chance.
I reckon their a chance... them and Glenelg and Torrens are the one's likely to meet Central.
If I had to go out on a limb and choose a team, I reckon it'll be the Tigers who make the grannie...
by bayman » Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:16 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:csbowes wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Norwood had their chance last year & chokeddon't think they'll get a 2nd chance.
I reckon their a chance... them and Glenelg and Torrens are the one's likely to meet Central.
If I had to go out on a limb and choose a team, I reckon it'll be the Tigers who make the grannie...
Glenelg know how to lose them.
by JK » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:29 am
NO-MERCY wrote:Norwood had their chance last year & chokeddon't think they'll get a 2nd chance.
by Aerie » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:16 am
by Booney » Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:15 am
HOORAY PUNT wrote:bayman wrote:Pag wrote:Thronton Sportsbet can't follow the SANFL that closely.
he doesn't, most of the blokes i know would prefer if thornton was still the only one betting on it, then there would be more mistakes because he can't copy off anyone else. i'll concede that i've seen steve churches at a few games throughout the last 2 or 3 years, i can add when the auditorium was open & i spoke with john himself he'd tell me about the previous weeks games & what he thought, yet while he was fielding at the races
![]()
![]()
.....almost everytime he told me something it was what i had read in the sunday mail or the monday edition of the advertiser earlier in the weekthe only team i would consider backing right now would be wwt, i think they are primed to win this year & i think they are the only team that can improve on the teams that made the 5 last year
Sounds like a poster on here .
by MatteeG » Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:41 am
Aerie wrote:Same deal again isn't it if you were a punter? Wait until Central drop a couple of games during the season and back them then?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by mal » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:24 pm
Big Phil wrote:I think this will be one of the most even years in a while for the SANFL league competition...
Interesting to see some of the early market favourites...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6003656673
Thornton Sportsbet:
$3 Norwood
$3.20 Central
$4 Eagles
$5 Glenelg
$10 Sturt
$15 North Adelaide
$21 Port Adelaide
$26 West Adelaide
$101 South Adelaide
UniTAB:
$3 Central
$3.50 Norwood
$5 Eagles, Glenelg
$11 Sturt
$15 West Adelaide, North Adelaide
$26 Port Adelaide
$67 South Adelaide
by redandblack » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:28 pm
by mal » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:30 pm
redandblack wrote:If they're the real odds, would you like to explain why North are a third of West's odds?
They finished below West last year and I don't see anything in the recruiting to shorten them that much in comparison.
by Booney » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:35 pm
mal wrote:redandblack wrote:If they're the real odds, would you like to explain why North are a third of West's odds?
They finished below West last year and I don't see anything in the recruiting to shorten them that much in comparison.
Because we know what WA will do
That is being a competitive team that will get them midfield
NA are an enigma, they can improve out of sight, the improvement in NA could be pronounced this season
by mal » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:38 pm
Booney wrote:mal wrote:redandblack wrote:If they're the real odds, would you like to explain why North are a third of West's odds?
They finished below West last year and I don't see anything in the recruiting to shorten them that much in comparison.
Because we know what WA will do
That is being a competitive team that will get them midfield
NA are an enigma, they can improve out of sight, the improvement in NA could be pronounced this season
Most SANFL fans ( bar Norths ) would agrre that they have seriously underachieved in recent seasons. I agree mal, North could be the big improvers.
by whufc » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:41 pm
Booney wrote:mal wrote:redandblack wrote:If they're the real odds, would you like to explain why North are a third of West's odds?
They finished below West last year and I don't see anything in the recruiting to shorten them that much in comparison.
Because we know what WA will do
That is being a competitive team that will get them midfield
NA are an enigma, they can improve out of sight, the improvement in NA could be pronounced this season
Most SANFL fans ( bar Norths ) would agrre that they have seriously underachieved in recent seasons. I agree mal, North could be the big improvers.
by nickname » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:55 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:31 pm
Booney wrote:mal wrote:redandblack wrote:If they're the real odds, would you like to explain why North are a third of West's odds?
They finished below West last year and I don't see anything in the recruiting to shorten them that much in comparison.
Because we know what WA will do
That is being a competitive team that will get them midfield
NA are an enigma, they can improve out of sight, the improvement in NA could be pronounced this season
Most SANFL fans ( bar Norths ) would agrre that they have seriously underachieved in recent seasons. I agree mal, North could be the big improvers.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by on the rails » Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:49 pm
nickname wrote:It's interesting how differently we see it. For mine, North have lost a fair bit of genuine quality and haven't really replaced it with much of similar quality. Their coach is an unknown quantity. I can't see them improving on 2010.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |