CUTTERMAN wrote:What I want to know is where was Leigh Treeby when this was happening
Trying to locate the Sturt cheersquad.....
by Dirko » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:29 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:What I want to know is where was Leigh Treeby when this was happening
by sjt » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:31 pm
by robranisgod » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:59 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:demonseye wrote:From what i have been told some of the locals up there didnt like the way the boys took over their pub and decided to belt one of them from behind and it escalated from there with a few of the bigger rooster boys sorting a few locals out.....
Didn't happen
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:04 pm
SJABC wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:What I want to know is where was Leigh Treeby when this was happening
Trying to locate the Sturt cheersquad.....
by Squawk » Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:11 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst less accepted in society these days, a decent blue with your mates while on the gas certainly is a bonding exercise.
by the joker » Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:14 pm
i work in stirling and have mates that live there and play for the Devils and they told me that people from the hills started it.devilsadvocate wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:
GE is mates with the hotel owner and his son works there. A huge street fight out the front of the Stirling is Bad publicity for both the NA and Stirling hotel.
Why wouldn't he want to sweep it under the carpet?
You honestly think a couple of footballers getting into a scrape would prevent people from attending the pub? If that were the case, most pubs in Australia would have closed down by now.
Most people no. But have you been to the Stirling recently? It's not really pitching at the outback-punchon-with-ya-mates-Walkabout type clientelle.
The place has been upgraded significantly to attract non fighting patrons, so any news of a massive fight out the front is hardly going to bring these people rushing through the doors is it.
I hope it doesn't impact the Stirling's business as the owner has done a lot of hard work to bring the place up to the standard it is today.
by whufc » Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:52 pm
by Barto » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:18 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:It's not really pitching at the outback-punchon-with-ya-mates-Walkabout type clientelle.
by holden78 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:38 pm
by Sheik Yerbouti » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:46 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Whilst less accepted in society these days, a decent blue with your mates while on the gas certainly is a bonding exercise.
Sorry mate, disagree. I know the other side of the story and North's involvement is a disgrace. If it was a fair, even fight then I might be able to understand, but what actually happened was far from.
The article fails to mention what happened to the other involved parties in all this.
Glen Elliot has a vested interest obviously. His son works at the hotel and he is good mates with the owner apparently. This will no doubt be swept under the carpet and kept as quiet as possible.
by holden78 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:57 pm
by dedja » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:18 pm
sjt wrote:I reckon Cornsey will say it's the fault of some Centrals supporters, that got lost.
by Barto » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:26 pm
by devilsadvocate » Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:16 pm
Barto wrote:It is pretty blatant though that only Rucci and Port fans are getting stuck into the North Adelaide side of things.
by ftandsq » Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:34 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:Barto wrote:It is pretty blatant though that only Rucci and Port fans are getting stuck into the North Adelaide side of things.
I only piped up because some posts make it sound like the NA boys are blameless angels and I know the boys involved in the other side of the story.
Nothing to do with port.
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:39 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:Barto wrote:It is pretty blatant though that only Rucci and Port fans are getting stuck into the North Adelaide side of things.
I only piped up because some posts make it sound like the NA boys are blameless angels and I know the boys involved in the other side of the story.
Nothing to do with port.
by devilsadvocate » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:16 am
ftandsq wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:Barto wrote:It is pretty blatant though that only Rucci and Port fans are getting stuck into the North Adelaide side of things.
I only piped up because some posts make it sound like the NA boys are blameless angels and I know the boys involved in the other side of the story.
Nothing to do with port.
DA, love your support for your so mates, but you werent there, and i can promise you that they were the instigators in the incident and the North boys didnt want anything to do with it! After having a team mate belted to a pulp for putting his hands up saying he didnt want any trouble as he was trying to get into bus, fair to say your mates might have been out there looking for it!
by devilsadvocate » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:18 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:Barto wrote:It is pretty blatant though that only Rucci and Port fans are getting stuck into the North Adelaide side of things.
I don't want to appear pushy but I've asked you previously in this thread to present the other side, and yet you have refrained from doing so. In the absence of any contrary information, those of us who know nothing of the incident have to assume the overwhelming support for the North boys to be correct.
by hawkseye » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:12 am
devilsadvocate wrote:ftandsq wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:Barto wrote:It is pretty blatant though that only Rucci and Port fans are getting stuck into the North Adelaide side of things.
I only piped up because some posts make it sound like the NA boys are blameless angels and I know the boys involved in the other side of the story.
Nothing to do with port.
DA, love your support for your so mates, but you werent there, and i can promise you that they were the instigators in the incident and the North boys didnt want anything to do with it! After having a team mate belted to a pulp for putting his hands up saying he didnt want any trouble as he was trying to get into bus, fair to say your mates might have been out there looking for it!
Mate I never said once my mates weren't the instigators.
What I'm saying is the na boys didn't have to get involved. It's very easy to avoid getting involved in a fight.
by am Bays » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:17 am
demonseye wrote:Yeah lets stand around and watch a teamate get hit when hes not looking![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |