by FlyingHigh » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:24 am
by HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:30 am
whufc wrote:they would probably need us to drop one other game as well as losing to them with the way percentage currently stands. i think we are roughly ten goals ahead on percentage which would be a huge margin to make up on the final day at elizabeth.
by bulldogproud2 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:48 am
by whufc » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:00 am
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:whufc wrote:they would probably need us to drop one other game as well as losing to them with the way percentage currently stands. i think we are roughly ten goals ahead on percentage which would be a huge margin to make up on the final day at elizabeth.
If your 10 goals ahead, a 5 goal win to the bays would close the gap. Think about it.
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:24 am
by Big Phil » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:30 am
by JK » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:16 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Norwood to me just seem to have a little more pace than the Bays which appears to make them more dangerous.
Perhaps the Bays area little similar to the Eagles of 2004-06, but of a feeling they had better teams and given it their best shot the few years previous?
by Rik E Boy » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:05 pm
dedja wrote::-$
by am Bays » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:16 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:dedja wrote::-$
**** no. Squawky has done the right thing HERE THEY ARE CENTRALS YOUR MAIN THREAT THE YABS THE YABS! NO, THIS WAY!!
Hee hee. Great work Squawk!
regards,
REB
by doggies4eva » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:21 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:35 pm
am Bays wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:dedja wrote::-$
**** no. Squawky has done the right thing HERE THEY ARE CENTRALS YOUR MAIN THREAT THE YABS THE YABS! NO, THIS WAY!!
Hee hee. Great work Squawk!
regards,
REB
Welcome back to the SANFL board Riky, Geelong not doing so good???![]()
by Booney » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:48 pm
by topsywaldron » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:18 pm
Booney wrote:Yep sitting second on the ladder they sure are keeping a low profile....
by Booney » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:26 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Booney wrote:Yep sitting second on the ladder they sure are keeping a low profile....
But it's a kind of sly and sneaky second.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:18 pm
am Bays wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:dedja wrote::-$
**** no. Squawky has done the right thing HERE THEY ARE CENTRALS YOUR MAIN THREAT THE YABS THE YABS! NO, THIS WAY!!
Hee hee. Great work Squawk!
regards,
REB
Welcome back to the SANFL board Riky, Geelong not doing so good???![]()
by Mickyj » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:03 pm
CENTURION wrote:people on here might think a team is flying under the radar but that means jack ****. Do you honestly think that the coaches & coaching staff at all the clubs to be involved in September & October take things that lightly?
by Mickyj » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:10 pm
Squawk wrote:whufc wrote:Don't think this will be an issue though because your boys are going to do us a favour a couple of weeks earlier, arent use now.
LMAO - I hope so but in about 3 weeks time there will no doubt be all sorts of talk going around when the sides are picked for Glenelg v Central. If top spot is sewn up and the Bays have a double chance sewn up - and let's just say neither team's reserves are certainties to make finals, we could see an interesting scenario:
Both sides resting players regardless
Both sides dropping players to the ressies to try and get their ressies team into the finals series so the whole squad can keep training
Both sides eagerly qualifying AFL players if Primus and Craig (who cant make the AFL finals) start looking at junior players and a few guys get dropped back to the SANFL.
Not sure on the qualification rule for a player to play reserves finals - do you have to play a minimum number of reserves games in the minor round to be able to play reserves finals? Or do you have to call up u/18s players?
So many possibilities....it will be an interesting month ahead. Almost a mini-finals series of sorts.
Central play Port (h), Eagles (a), Sturt (a) and Glenelg (hm)
Glenelg play the Eagles (a), South (hm), Norwood (hm) and Central (a)
Norwood has a bye, then Sturt (hm), Glenelg (a) and West (hm)
Eagles have Glenelg (hm), Central (hm), North (a) and Sturt (hm)
West has Sturt (hm), Port (hm), South (a) and Norwood (a).
Sturt has West (a), Norwood (a), Central (hm) and Eagles (a).
How those results pan out at reserves level is just as interesting as how they pan out at league level.
But irrespective, the Bays could be in their premiership window in 2010 you'd think. Yet no one seems to want to talk about them in that way! All we hear about is Ty Allen's beard and Bechara Palmer!
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:24 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:44 pm
by Mad Mat » Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:25 pm
Big Phil wrote:I think Glenelg are as good a chance as any recent year to win the Premiership in 2010.
A massive bonus for them come finals time will be the experienced, hard-nut agression of Josh Carr, something they didn't have last year.
Also, Danny Meyer, if available to them from the Power (yes he has qualified but Port still have to give him permission to play) can add versatility, while their forwards are very accurate this year compared to season's past.
The BIG test for the Bays is the mental monkey on the back about their straight sets exit last year. Yes, not all playing this year were there last but it would have to test the resolve of some players and it's a matter of how much they let it effect their performance or not.
I think the Bays COULD win the flag this year, after all isn't it the Chinese Year of the Tiger ?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |