Pathetic SANFL Progamming

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby lesthemechanic » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:29 am

CUTTERMAN wrote:
beenreal wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I reckon its more Port being disorganised and worrying more about mergers at the time than anything else.

West have been able to move 2 of their games this year. Why? Because they approached the SANFL and the opposition club well before the event and all parties came to agreement.

All clubs get a draft fixture to ponder over. I'm also assuming that Port didnt ask to play a home game when the power had the week off because why would the SANFL knock that back?
West were able to change fixture dates, why Port couldnt when the draft fixture came out I dont know.


Yeah right, the merger was such a minor little issue. Please, are you Leigh Whicker in disguise?

As for shifting games, West Adelaide gave far less notice of their desire to shift the Port game to Friday night than Port gave to Glenelg, yet Port agreed to the move.


The real question is, why the programing was done that way in the first place? Incompetance or Agenda?

I probably don't have all my facts so please correct me if I'm wrong. Wasn't the Port v Glenelg game going to be played at FP before a Power game? If so, what are the Glenelg supporters expected to do, buy a $25 ticket just to see their team play when they can see them for $10 or already have a season ticket?


And I might be wrong too, but wasn't it a Glenelg home game ? Why would they want to play that on a neutral ground ? Where would their share of the catering go ? I fully understand them refusing to shift that game if it was their home game .
lesthemechanic
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: Gawler East S.A.
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby beenreal » Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:05 am

CUTTERMAN wrote:
beenreal wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I reckon its more Port being disorganised and worrying more about mergers at the time than anything else.

West have been able to move 2 of their games this year. Why? Because they approached the SANFL and the opposition club well before the event and all parties came to agreement.

All clubs get a draft fixture to ponder over. I'm also assuming that Port didnt ask to play a home game when the power had the week off because why would the SANFL knock that back?
West were able to change fixture dates, why Port couldnt when the draft fixture came out I dont know.


Yeah right, the merger was such a minor little issue. Please, are you Leigh Whicker in disguise?

As for shifting games, West Adelaide gave far less notice of their desire to shift the Port game to Friday night than Port gave to Glenelg, yet Port agreed to the move.

The real question is, why the programing was done that way in the first place? Incompetance or Agenda?

I probably don't have all my facts so please correct me if I'm wrong. Wasn't the Port v Glenelg game going to be played at FP before a Power game? If so, what are the Glenelg supporters expected to do, buy a $25 ticket just to see their team play when they can see them for $10 or already have a season ticket?


Glenelg Season Ticket holders got in free. Normal supporters paid $10 before half time. Port Adelaide's home game later in the year was transferred to Glenelg, and they got a split of the game day takings.

Seems like a pretty good deal. Unless you're a totally Pig-headed CEO!
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby CUTTERMAN » Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:15 am

I'd have to say that sounds pretty fair. Obviously they could they stay for the Power game? (against richmond?)
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby PatowalongaPirate » Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:16 am

I almost wish Glenelg did agree to change the venue, would've been great to hang around for the second game...
safooty Melbourne Cup Day Tipping Champion 2018 & 2019 #Back2Back
2018 safooty NFL Tipping Champion
User avatar
PatowalongaPirate
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 6000
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Tiger Land
Has liked: 469 times
Been liked: 1304 times
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby dedja » Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:19 am

I wish they'd changed it too ... it was a great day for it. 8)
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23335
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 660 times
Been liked: 1544 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby finn » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:03 am

beenreal wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I reckon its more Port being disorganised and worrying more about mergers at the time than anything else.

West have been able to move 2 of their games this year. Why? Because they approached the SANFL and the opposition club well before the event and all parties came to agreement.

All clubs get a draft fixture to ponder over. I'm also assuming that Port didnt ask to play a home game when the power had the week off because why would the SANFL knock that back?
West were able to change fixture dates, why Port couldnt when the draft fixture came out I dont know.


Yeah right, the merger was such a minor little issue. Please, are you Leigh Whicker in disguise?

As for shifting games, West Adelaide gave far less notice of their desire to shift the Port game to Friday night than Port gave to Glenelg, yet Port agreed to the move.

The real question is, why the programing was done that way in the first place? Incompetance or Agenda?


Because the clubs are supposedly two different entities...

Yes, i know they have crossover support but so do many others as well.

The draw is also flawed due to its necessity of having one saturday afternoon game for the abc (which in itself is a great publicity tool). I certainly agree that that until round 9/10, teams should play each other once before playing another team twice.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Lynwood » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:06 am

beenreal wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:
beenreal wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I reckon its more Port being disorganised and worrying more about mergers at the time than anything else.

West have been able to move 2 of their games this year. Why? Because they approached the SANFL and the opposition club well before the event and all parties came to agreement.

All clubs get a draft fixture to ponder over. I'm also assuming that Port didnt ask to play a home game when the power had the week off because why would the SANFL knock that back?
West were able to change fixture dates, why Port couldnt when the draft fixture came out I dont know.


Yeah right, the merger was such a minor little issue. Please, are you Leigh Whicker in disguise?

As for shifting games, West Adelaide gave far less notice of their desire to shift the Port game to Friday night than Port gave to Glenelg, yet Port agreed to the move.

The real question is, why the programing was done that way in the first place? Incompetance or Agenda?

I probably don't have all my facts so please correct me if I'm wrong. Wasn't the Port v Glenelg game going to be played at FP before a Power game? If so, what are the Glenelg supporters expected to do, buy a $25 ticket just to see their team play when they can see them for $10 or already have a season ticket?


Glenelg Season Ticket holders got in free. Normal supporters paid $10 before half time. Port Adelaide's home game later in the year was transferred to Glenelg, and they got a split of the game day takings.

Seems like a pretty good deal. Unless you're a totally Pig-headed CEO!


But then we also lose that home game later in the year so what would we gain by losing revenue from that match? I for one would not have gone to sit in a reserved seat for an SANFL match.
User avatar
Lynwood
Rookie
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:39 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Dutchy » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:37 am

beenreal wrote:Glenelg Season Ticket holders got in free. Normal supporters paid $10 before half time. Port Adelaide's home game later in the year was transferred to Glenelg, and they got a split of the game day takings.

Seems like a pretty good deal. Unless you're a totally Pig-headed CEO!


CEO?? We havent got one, our previous one got sacked and new one starts in July....get it right please

Talking CEO's why didnt your request this fixture BEFORE the draw came out?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45965
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2578 times
Been liked: 4194 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby beenreal » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:53 am

Dutchy wrote:
beenreal wrote:Glenelg Season Ticket holders got in free. Normal supporters paid $10 before half time. Port Adelaide's home game later in the year was transferred to Glenelg, and they got a split of the game day takings.

Seems like a pretty good deal. Unless you're a totally Pig-headed CEO!


CEO?? We havent got one, our previous one got sacked and new one starts in July....get it right please

Talking CEO's why didnt your request this fixture BEFORE the draw came out?


CEO, President... whatever. Gary Metcalf, the most powerful man in SA football.

And again, who are you to say Port Adelaide didn't put in the request that this stupid, incomprehensible, anomaly was changed?
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Pseudo » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:53 am

beenreal wrote:Glenelg Season Ticket holders got in free. Normal supporters paid $10 before half time. Port Adelaide's home game later in the year was transferred to Glenelg, and they got a split of the game day takings.

Seems like a pretty good deal. Unless you're a totally Pig-headed CEO!

Still seems like a cr@p deal to this season ticket holder, given that I would sacrifice a Sunday afternoon slot for a Saturday morning. The game would have had to start well before midday in order to leave room for the PAPs scheduled pre-match w@nk. Considering increased travel time and personal commitments I'd have had difficulty getting there before half time. I for one am glad that the GFC said NO. The league does not revolve around Port Adelaide. The sooner you and yours get your minds around this simple fact, the sooner your clubs might pull themselves out of the mire.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12171
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1639 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Pseudo » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:56 am

beenreal wrote:CEO, President... whatever. Gary Metcalf, the most powerful man in SA football.

Ahh, now I see your problem. You not only voluntarily read Roochie's sputum, you actually take it as gospel!
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12171
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1639 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Dirko » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:00 pm

Pseudo wrote:Still seems like a cr@p deal to this season ticket holder, given that I would sacrifice a Sunday afternoon slot for a Saturday morning. The game would have had to start well before midday in order to leave room for the PAPs scheduled pre-match w@nk. Considering increased travel time and personal commitments I'd have had difficulty getting there before half time. I for one am glad that the GFC said NO. The league does not revolve around Port Adelaide. The sooner you and yours get your minds around this simple fact, the sooner your clubs might pull themselves out of the mire.


Exactly ! Well said Pseudo. How many people would've been there for the start of the game at 1130 ish. None that's how many. Almost the same amount of people that rocked up to watch the Power celebrate 140 years of Magpie traditions.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Dutchy » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:06 pm

beenreal wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
beenreal wrote:Glenelg Season Ticket holders got in free. Normal supporters paid $10 before half time. Port Adelaide's home game later in the year was transferred to Glenelg, and they got a split of the game day takings.

Seems like a pretty good deal. Unless you're a totally Pig-headed CEO!


CEO?? We havent got one, our previous one got sacked and new one starts in July....get it right please

Talking CEO's why didnt your request this fixture BEFORE the draw came out?


CEO, President... whatever. Gary Metcalf, the most powerful man in SA football.

And again, who are you to say Port Adelaide didn't put in the request that this stupid, incomprehensible, anomaly was changed?


Give me proof that they did....
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45965
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2578 times
Been liked: 4194 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:08 pm

^:)^ Gary Metcalf - Our Pres.

When Gary and his Board made the decision not to play the Magpies as an AAMI curtain-raiser they were applauded by their members and supporters.

Don't think anyone should bag them for that.
User avatar
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:04 pm
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 7 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:09 pm

Dutchy wrote:Give me proof that they did....


Rooch said so! :lol:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Dutchy » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:16 pm

Wedgie wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Give me proof that they did....


Rooch said so! :lol:


Nah even he was trying to deflect the blame to Glenelg...rather than look at the incompetence at Alberton
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45965
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2578 times
Been liked: 4194 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:17 pm

Haven't you learnt by now? It's always the other 8 clubs fault.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progaming

Postby Booney » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:18 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Give me proof that they did....


Rooch said so! :lol:


Nah even he was trying to deflect the blame to Glenelg...rather than look at the incompetence at Alberton


The most over used word on SAFooty.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60940
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8045 times
Been liked: 11720 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby dedja » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:20 pm

LOL, it would be easy to condense 2,783 threads into 2 or 3 with these circular Port discusions.

Groundhog Day.

:lol:
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23335
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 660 times
Been liked: 1544 times

Re: Pathetic SANFL Progamming

Postby am Bays » Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:09 pm

Kum-by-yah My Lord, Kum-by-yah....

Actually the decision was taken off the GFC by the SANFL because when discussed at the GFC board meeting we required more information and were unable to make a decision at the time. Due to the time we took the SANFL made the decision to stay with the existing program.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19618
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2086 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |