SANFL/SACA SURVEY

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: SANFL/SACA SURVEY

Postby on the rails » Fri May 14, 2010 11:17 am

Wedgie wrote:
Booney wrote:Wedgie, you dont like Adelaide Oval nor Footy Park, what would you like to see? I guess a new purpose built Stadium, but where?

Where the new hospital is proposed and preferably with nothing to do with the SACA.


What he said! My take is that this whole redevelopment of Adelaide Oval is only going to benefit the SACA and costs Football in the long run. If you are going to spend $450M plus whatever the Feds chuck in if Australia wins the FIFA bid - why wouldn't you build a new multi-purpose covered Stadium where the railyards are and let the SANFL run it.

Let AO do the upgrades that they currently doing are via the SACA which were on the table and in progess before Andy and his AFL cronies stepped in and not spoil the unique feel of the AO which will happen if the current proposed $450M deal goes ahead.

Also - what will FP look like in the future re the SANFL? A lot of land around will be sold off but if they retain the Stadium in it's present size and shape it will continue to lack the atmosphere etc for SANFL finals (excepting maybe the GF) that the CURRENT AO has and could (will) turn out to be a really big Concrete White Elephant?
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: SANFL/SACA SURVEY

Postby hawkseye » Fri May 14, 2010 2:40 pm

Doesnt all come down to if its lucrative for football then the SANFL will move there and if its not then they wont?
IMO we need a new hospital on the railyards because the RAH is a disgrace and bandaiding it only lasts for so long.
Thats what im talkin aboooouuuut!!!!!!
User avatar
hawkseye
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3053
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: chappell bar
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: West Croydon

Re: SANFL/SACA SURVEY

Postby CUTTERMAN » Fri May 14, 2010 7:05 pm

on the rails wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Booney wrote:Wedgie, you dont like Adelaide Oval nor Footy Park, what would you like to see? I guess a new purpose built Stadium, but where?

Where the new hospital is proposed and preferably with nothing to do with the SACA.


What he said! My take is that this whole redevelopment of Adelaide Oval is only going to benefit the SACA and costs Football in the long run. If you are going to spend $450M plus whatever the Feds chuck in if Australia wins the FIFA bid - why wouldn't you build a new multi-purpose covered Stadium where the railyards are and let the SANFL run it.

Let AO do the upgrades that they currently doing are via the SACA which were on the table and in progess before Andy and his AFL cronies stepped in and not spoil the unique feel of the AO which will happen if the current proposed $450M deal goes ahead.

Also - what will FP look like in the future re the SANFL? A lot of land around will be sold off but if they retain the Stadium in it's present size and shape it will continue to lack the atmosphere etc for SANFL finals (excepting maybe the GF) that the CURRENT AO has and could (will) turn out to be a really big Concrete White Elephant?

I think you'll find that the plan is to down size FP to a more reasonable size for SANFL games, so maybe a capacity of 20-30,000. I haven't seen plans of it but have been interested as to what the exact intention is.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: SANFL/SACA SURVEY

Postby CUTTERMAN » Fri May 14, 2010 7:08 pm

Blueandwhiteforever wrote:Cutterman where does it stop 80000 sent already and if you send to all members of grade cricket and sanfl you are up to over 100000 and then you need to chase em all up so get in on time.

That's a fair point, but what's wrong with each SANFL club doing an email out to their members on behalf of the SANFL. As with any survey it is only based on the reply's that you get back and those you don't get back are you appathetic percentage.
In the end it's no big deal for me but I'm just surprised that they haven't been included.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: SANFL/SACA SURVEY

Postby Rucciangelo » Sat May 15, 2010 12:19 am

CUTTERMAN wrote:I think you'll find that the plan is to down size FP to a more reasonable size for SANFL games, so maybe a capacity of 20-30,000. I haven't seen plans of it but have been interested as to what the exact intention is.


Where are you coming up with this suggestion from Cutter?
Nothing is over the line with any of it...purely speculation!
Failure is only the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.
User avatar
Rucciangelo
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Half Back Flank
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SANFL/SACA SURVEY

Postby CUTTERMAN » Sat May 15, 2010 1:12 am

Was part of the whole Adelaide Oval re development plan back in November
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |