Norwood and Port

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Voice » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:11 pm

staritski wrote:
Voice wrote:A crap Port and crap Norwood for years now and the overall crowds at the SANFL have been steadily rising over those years.
Inflating your own self worth staritski :roll: .
Don't let facts get in the way of your nonsense mate.


Oh sorry voice, i forgot about the massive crowds you were getting when you were nearly finished. This thread isnt about sticking it up any team.Conversley, its about keeping the comp strong. Having a competitive Sturt is also important, as it is Glenelg etc. If any one thinks that a continual weak Norwood and Port will do the SANFL any favours will need their head read. So get off your high horse champ, and think about how you reply.

Norwood nearly finished are they champ? Could we be rid of Port and Norwood all in the same year?
Norwoods crowds are inflated somewhat due to having Friday night games. I know alot of people, including myself, that head to Norwood every now and then to watch even when my sides not playing. I've done the same with West matches this year.
Btw, I'm sure kids get counted in crowd figures. They don't count ticket stubs to get the figure, they have a click counter in their hands.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby topsywaldron » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:19 pm

Voice wrote:Could we be rid of Port and Norwood all in the same year?


And then North can go because they're knobs, Centrals can go because they keep beating you in games that matter and the Eagles will go because, actually no one cares why the Eagles will go. At this rate you'll be playing with yourself Voice.

Hang on a minute....
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby o five » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:40 pm

staritski wrote:Subject to what many people think, the long term prosperity of the SANFL, will depend on the strength of Port and Norwood. It was evident on Sunday night that as cellar dwellers, they were still able to pull nearly 7,000 people.No matter how successfull other clubs are at the moment, or into the future, they will never have the ability to sustain such numbers. A strong comp needs teams teams with a good supporter base. Whether people like it or not, SA footy needs a healthy and vibrant Norwood and Port to keep its place as the premier comp outside the AFL (or the expanded VFL as many people see it).


Understand where you are coming from staritski, but really its time for the both of you to pull your fingers out and climb back up the ladder. Hell we did it and we were on the bones of our ass a few years back.
Most people on here know that a healthy NWD and PT is good for the SANFL but we don`t need it shoved down our throat every second or third topic, we`ve heard it all before.
o five
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:25 am
Has liked: 219 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby JK » Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:19 pm

o five wrote:
staritski wrote:Subject to what many people think, the long term prosperity of the SANFL, will depend on the strength of Port and Norwood. It was evident on Sunday night that as cellar dwellers, they were still able to pull nearly 7,000 people.No matter how successfull other clubs are at the moment, or into the future, they will never have the ability to sustain such numbers. A strong comp needs teams teams with a good supporter base. Whether people like it or not, SA footy needs a healthy and vibrant Norwood and Port to keep its place as the premier comp outside the AFL (or the expanded VFL as many people see it).


Understand where you are coming from staritski, but really its time for the both of you to pull your fingers out and climb back up the ladder. Hell we did it and we were on the bones of our ass a few years back.
Most people on here know that a healthy NWD and PT is good for the SANFL but we don`t need it shoved down our throat every second or third topic, we`ve heard it all before.


Excellent post mate .. Effectively actions speak louder than words.

Very well said.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Voice » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:21 am

topsywaldron wrote:
Voice wrote:Could we be rid of Port and Norwood all in the same year?


And then North can go because they're knobs, Centrals can go because they keep beating you in games that matter and the Eagles will go because, actually no one cares why the Eagles will go. At this rate you'll be playing with yourself Voice.

Hang on a minute....

Can't read sarcasm topsy? The fact that highlighted "crowds when we were nearly finished" regarding Sturt in the 90's and his comparison of that to Norwood's situation now didn't switch any lights on for you? :roll: You conveniently left that out of your quote mate.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby staritski » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:59 am

Voice wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
Voice wrote:Could we be rid of Port and Norwood all in the same year?


And then North can go because they're knobs, Centrals can go because they keep beating you in games that matter and the Eagles will go because, actually no one cares why the Eagles will go. At this rate you'll be playing with yourself Voice.

Hang on a minute....

Can't read sarcasm topsy? The fact that highlighted "crowds when we were nearly finished" regarding Sturt in the 90's and his comparison of that to Norwood's situation now didn't switch any lights on for you? :roll: You conveniently left that out of your quote mate.


Sorry voice, i was actually referring to the 80's, but forgot you were sh*t in most of the 90's as well, so cheers for pointing that out for me!
staritski
Member
 
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:28 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby CENTURION » Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:15 pm

what a bunch of bitches. simple fact, whether you like them or not, the SANFL would be far worse off without them, in fact, without any team probably.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Voice » Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:38 pm

CENTURION wrote:what a bunch of bitches. simple fact, whether you like them or not, the SANFL would be far worse off without them, in fact, without any team probably.

And that is the point. Not one side is more valuable to the comp than any other.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Voice » Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:39 pm

staritski wrote:
Voice wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
Voice wrote:Could we be rid of Port and Norwood all in the same year?


And then North can go because they're knobs, Centrals can go because they keep beating you in games that matter and the Eagles will go because, actually no one cares why the Eagles will go. At this rate you'll be playing with yourself Voice.

Hang on a minute....

Can't read sarcasm topsy? The fact that highlighted "crowds when we were nearly finished" regarding Sturt in the 90's and his comparison of that to Norwood's situation now didn't switch any lights on for you? :roll: You conveniently left that out of your quote mate.


Sorry voice, i was actually referring to the 80's, but forgot you were sh*t in most of the 90's as well, so cheers for pointing that out for me!

Sorry staritski, was actually talking to topsy on this occasion ;) :roll:
You can live in the past if you like but the fact is, we've been better than you for a long time now.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 01, 2010 12:05 am

Voice wrote:Sorry staritski, was actually talking to topsy on this occasion ;) :roll:
You can live in the past if you like but the fact is, we've been better than you for a long time now.


And looking at tonight, I think you are the one living in the past. Sturt are a rabble mate.

As for crowds, the Norwood v Port crowd last week was a lot bigger that the crowd tonight. So much for Sturt's drawing capacity :lol:
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Pseudo » Sat May 01, 2010 12:08 am

Voice wrote:You can live in the past if you like but the fact is, we've been better than you for a long time now.


Image
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12255
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Voice » Sat May 01, 2010 12:08 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
Voice wrote:Sorry staritski, was actually talking to topsy on this occasion ;) :roll:
You can live in the past if you like but the fact is, we've been better than you for a long time now.


And looking at tonight, I think you are the one living in the past. Sturt are a rabble mate.

As for crowds, the Norwood v Port crowd last week was a lot bigger that the crowd tonight. So much for Sturt's drawing capacity :lol:

Easy after a win isn't mate. Let's see if you actually make finals this year mate. Other than that, congrats on your big win. Outplayed us easily. Enjoy.
Last edited by Voice on Sat May 01, 2010 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby Voice » Sat May 01, 2010 12:09 am

Pseudo wrote:
Voice wrote:You can live in the past if you like but the fact is, we've been better than you for a long time now.


Image

I'll take that one :lol:
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby staritski » Sat May 01, 2010 10:35 am

Voice wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
Voice wrote:You can live in the past if you like but the fact is, we've been better than you for a long time now.


Image

I'll take that one :lol:


Just like Sturt took it from our boys!!! :D
staritski
Member
 
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:28 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood and Port

Postby SDK » Sat May 01, 2010 6:45 pm

The loss of any team from the SANFL would be a disaster and we should never let that happen.
We all love our own clubs, most with a passion.

The inescapable fact is that a Port or Norwood in full flight playing well and winning consistently has the potential to draw bigger crowds than say a xxxxxx. POTENTIAL !
When Sturt and Glenelg were bottom all those years no one went to their games.
When Norwood and Port are in that position those two clubs still pull good crowds.
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mic and 25 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |